Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04135170

Last Updated: 2021-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

9172 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-14

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: The current evidence on the efficacy of Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the US where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. It has been claimed that the antibiotic in ALBC increase the risk of aseptic loosening, risk of systemic toxicity, allergic reaction, and bacterial resistance. Therefore we designed a double-blinded (patients and data analysts) pragmatic multicenter register-based randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared to plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods and analysis: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomized into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. . The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be:

* risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up;
* patient related outcome measures (PROMs) like function, pain, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life at 1-, 6-, and 10-years of follow-up;
* risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; and
* cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC vs plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomization with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomize patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomization, and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK-Vest) (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) dated: 21.06.2019. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension (CONSORT Extension) reporting guideline 2010 statement for non-inferiority trials. The trial results will be reported to the public through national and international scientific conferences, participating hospitals, patient organizations, and peer-reviewed journals.

Discussion: If we find that plain bone cement is non-inferior to the ALBC, it will challenge the routine use of ALBC in primary arthroplasty, due to ecological concerns and costs. However, if routine use of ALBC is associated with a reduced risk of PJI and with minor impact on bacterial resistance, PROMs, and costs, the well-established use of prophylactic ALBC in primary arthroplasty will be supported

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA in any Norwegian hospitals are eligible for participation irrespectively of the diagnosis leading to TKA. and randomly assigned to receive ALBC (control group) or plain bone cement (experimental group).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
This is a double blinded, non-inferiority register-based multicenter randomized controlled trial study. To ensure blinding of the patients, all patients are operated by the same surgical method and the type of cement is unknown to the patients. In this study, blinding of the surgeon is not possible because the surgeon recognizes the cement type and has to document the type of cement in the registration form. We believe the primary endpoint of this trial is not likely to be influenced by the surgeon knowledge of the cement used in the index surgery. The data analyst will be blinded for groups until the entire trial analysis has been completed to minimize the risk of bias that may be introduced during the statistical analysis because of the selective use and reporting of statistical tests.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plain bone cement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ALBC vs plain bone cement

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.

Antibiotic loaded bone cement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ALBC vs plain bone cement

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ALBC vs plain bone cement

The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA irrespective of the diagnosis leading to TKA

Exclusion Criteria

* any history of infection in the knee, a need for fully stabilized or hinged TKA, a history of allergy to the antibiotics used in the cement, inability or not willing to consent for inclusion in NAR or the trial, and participation in other studies that might have pharmacological interaction with this trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helse Vest

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Asst. professor Tesfaye Hordofa Leta (Nurse, Postdoc fellow)

Associate professor/ postdoc fellowship

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ove Furnes, MD/PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tesfaye H Leta, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4791691925

Ove Furnes, MD/PhD

Role: CONTACT

+4790840088

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ove Furnes, PhD

Role: primary

55975690 ext. 0047

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leta TH, Gjertsen JE, Dale H, Hallan G, Lygre SHL, Fenstad AM, Dyrhovden GS, Westberg M, Wik TS, Jakobsen RB, Aamodt A, Rohrl SM, Gothesen OJ, Lindalen E, Heir S, Ludvigsen J, Bruun T, Hansen AK, Aune KEM, Warholm M, Skjetne JP, Badawy M, Hovding P, Husby OS, Karlsen OE, Furnes O. Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Register-based Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial (ALBA trial). BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):e041096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041096.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33509845 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NorwegianArthroplastyRegister

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.