Cardiac Mitochondrial Function After Heart Transplantation
NCT ID: NCT04105803
Last Updated: 2020-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
64 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-04-25
2024-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PGF and CAV remain the major heart related mortality causes, and additional assessment and treatments are therefore needed.
Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is diagnosed based on endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), which are routinely performed to ensure prober immunosuppression in HTx patients. ACR occur in approximately 25% of HTx patients, and is associated with PGF and CAV. However, mitochondrial function and integrity may prove to be a more sensitive marker of allograft rejection than endomyocardial biopsies. Therefore, assessment of mitochondrial function may allow for earlier detection of allograft rejection and dysfunction. This may be of particular importance as emerging treatments are targeting both energy substrate supply for adenosine-triphosphate generation produced by the mitochondria and mitochondrial function in the failing heart.
Despite the association between graft rejection and mitochondrial function, it remains unsettled whether mitochondrial function associate with PGF, ACR and CAV. Such findings may be of prognostic importance and even elucidate new treatment targets. Hence, we evaluate the mitochondrial status in HTx patients through four studies designed to assess different aspects of the interplay between cardiac function and mitochondrial integrity and function.
Hypotheses:
Study 1: Primary graft pump function is correlated to mitochondrial function in the first myocardial biopsy taken from the donor heart during the operation.
Study 2: Cardiac mitochondrial function improves over the first 3 months after a heart transplantation.
Study 3: Heart transplant patients with moderate to severe coronary graft vasculopathy has impaired mitochondrial function.
Study 4: Myocardial external energy efficiency by positron-emission tomography can be used as a marker of mitochondrial function and chronic rejection in HTx patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiac Mitochondrial Function in Explanted Human Hearts
NCT04500938
Acute Cardiac Dysfunction in Critical Illnes
NCT05860504
Observational Study With Additional Procedures: Metabolomic and Ultrastructural Findings of Allograft in Heart Transplantation and Their Correlation With Graft Dysfunction.
NCT07125703
Vitamin D in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT00501553
Cardiac Transplant Metabolomics With and Without Rejection
NCT05772442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prognosis after heart transplantation (HTx) has improved considerably since the first HTx was performed in 1967. Studies from our group have shown both left and right ventricular function is affected immediately after heart transplantation, but this seems to recover to some extent over the first year. This immediate effect on the graft organ following HTx is associated with tissue ischemia and reperfusion injury causing cellular energy depletion, mitochondrial failure and subsequent apoptosis. The condition may progress into full blown primary graft failure (PGF) with a need for mechanical cardiovascular support or inotropes which is seen in 3-30 % of HTx patients. The cardiac injury will consequently increase the risk of morbidity as well as mortality. In addition to acute PGF, a chronic rejection owing to coronary arterial vasculopathy (CAV) may develop. Hence, despite advances in peritransplantation treatment and immunosuppression, PGF and CAV remain the major heart related mortality causes following HTx and additional assessment and treatments are therefore needed.
Graft rejection is diagnosed, and the severity graded based on endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) taken percutaneously through the jugular or femoral veins. These biopsies are routinely performed at our institution to ensure prober immunosuppression following HTx.1 Acute cellular rejection (ACR) may occur in approximately 25% of the patients which is associated with PGF, CAV and later chronic rejection. However, mitochondrial function and integrity may prove to be a more sensitive marker of allograft rejection. In heart failure, mitochondria density changes while function and integrity is impaired linking the failing heart to energy deprivation. Animal studies demonstrate that deterioration in total mitochondrial function precedes histopathological changes during cardiac graft rejection following HTx. Therefore, assessment of mitochondrial function following HTx may allow for earlier detection of rejection and allograft dysfunction. This may be of particular importance as emerging treatments are targeting both energy substrate supply for adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) generation produced by the mitochondria as well as mitochondrial function in the failing heart. At our institution, we have established methods to evaluate mitochondrial function in myocardial tissue, and pilot studies have demonstrated feasibility with the use of EMB. In addition, by use of non-invasive 11C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET), we can assess myocardial external energy efficiency (MEE) calculated by the ratio of myocardial external work (EW) and oxidative metabolism (MVO2). Thus, enabling quantification of coupling between mitochondrial energy production and mechanical work.
Despite the overt association between graft dysfunction/rejection and mitochondrial function, it remains unsettled whether mitochondrial content and function associate with PGF, ACR and CAV. Such findings may be of prognostic importance and even elucidate a new treatment target.
Hypotheses
1. Primary graft pump function is correlated to mitochondrial function in the first myocardial biopsy taken from the donor heart during the operation
2. Cardiac mitochondrial function improves over the first 3 months after a heart transplantation
3. Heart transplant patients with moderate to severe coronary graft vasculopathy has impaired mitochondrial function
4. MEE can be used as a marker of mitochondrial function and chronic rejection in HTx patients
Objectives
Study 1: To examine whether primary myocardial function is related to cardiac mitochondrial function in de novo HTx patients
Study 2: To investigate whether cardiac mitochondrial function improves over time after HTx along with improvement of cardiac function
Study 3: To examine whether heart transplanted patients with chronic rejection and graft vasculopathy have impaired mitochondrial function
Study 4: To evaluate whether MEE can be used as marker of mitochondrial function and chronic rejection
Design and endpoints
Study 1: The association between cardiac and mitochondrial function following HTx
Design: Myocardial mitochondrial function analyzed from 15 HTx patients taken from the donor heart during the transplantation will be compared to EMB from 15 HTx patients at scheduled biopsies (1 or 2 years after implantation)
Study 2: Development in cardiac and mitochondrial function following HTx Design: Mitochondrial function measured at scheduled EBM follow-up (1,2,3,4,8,12 weeks and 6 months after HTx) from 24 HTx patients. These results are compared to 15 patients with biopsies performed at 1 and 2 years after HTx.
Study 3: The impact of coronary arterial vasculopathy on mitochondrial function Design: Mitochondrial function assessed at scheduled EMB follow-up visits of patients with CAV as determined by coronary angiography (scheduled procedure) 15 HTx patients CAV are compared to 15 HTx patients with without CAV.
Study 4: MEE as a non-invasive marker of mitochondrial function and allograft rejection Design: 24 HTX patients scheduled for EMB will be examined twice with 11C-acetate-PET. It is intended that we consecutively recruit patients enrolled in study 2. The first examination is performed within 3 weeks following HTx and the second examination after 6 months. Up to 4 weeks between EMB and the second 11C-acetate PET examination is accepted.
(The HTx patient cohort which is subjected to biopsies 1 and 2 years after HTx in study 3 (n=15) is reused in study 1 and 2 as a comparable cohort. Hence, a total of 69 patients are enrolled. However, it is anticipated that several patients from study 1 and are enrolled in study 2 which will decrease the total number of participants.)
Methods
Mitochondrial function will be assessed in myocardial biopsies by High-resolution respirometry and Electron microscopy
Cardiac functions is assessed by transthoracic echocardiography
Coronary Angiography is performed to assess the degree of CAV
Blood samples will be taken
In study 4, MEE will be assessed by positron emission tomography using validated kinetic methods.
Ethical considerations
The project will be carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration II. The protocol, including the written participant information and consent forms must be finally approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Central Denmark Region and .
Publication and study plan All results, whether positive, negative or inconclusive will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Perspectives Cellular rejection (ACR) shortly after HTx is strongly associated with the long-term development of CAV and subsequent myocardial dysfunction. As graft failure and CAV are the major long-term heart-related late mortality causes following HTx, it seems paramount to modify long-term hazards such as ACR, CAV, and graft failure to significantly improve post-transplant outcome.5 In this context mitochondrial function seems to be pivotal, hence, approaches to assess mitochondrial function in HTx patient may prove to pave the way for new follow-up algorithms and even treatment targets.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
De novo HTx
Procedure: Two perprocedural biopsies under transplantation is performed from the left ventricular septum.
Procedure: Endomyocardial biopsies from the right ventricular septum, taken at scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits at our department (protocol is to take 4-5 biopsies, two additional biopsies will be taken at this visit).
Procedure: is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits. This recording will be used for CAV evaluation. In addition to the protocol procedure, we will evaluate the hemodynamic status in the patients.
Diagnostic test: Echocardiography and coronary angiography is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits.
No interventions assigned to this group
Longterm HTx
Procedure: Endomyocardial biopsies from the right ventricular septum, taken at scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits at our department (protocol is to take 4-5 biopsies, two additional biopsies will be taken at this visit).
Procedure: Coronary Angiography is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits. This recording will be used for CAV evaluation. In addition to the protocol procedure, we will evaluate the hemodynamic status in the patients.
Diagnostic test: Echocardiography is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits. No additional examinations will be performed. We will use the standard recordings to calculate the desired parameters.
No interventions assigned to this group
PET-scan de novo HTx
Radiation: Two PET-scans with 11C-acetate tracer will be performed.
Procedure: Two perprocedural biopsies under transplantation is performed from the left ventricular septum.
Procedure: Endomyocardial biopsies from the right ventricular septum, taken at scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits at our department (protocol is to take 4-5 biopsies, two additional biopsies will be taken at this visit).
Procedure: Coronary Angiography is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits. This recording will be used for CAV evaluation. In addition to the protocol procedure, we will evaluate the hemodynamic status in the patients.
Diagnostic test: Echocardiography is part of the scheduled standard HTx follow-up visits. No additional examinations will be performed. We will use the standard recordings to calculate the desired parameters.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Endomyocardial biopsy not feasible assessed by surgeon
* Pregnancy (Study 4 only)
* Myocardial infarction, or hospitalization within 1 month due to any cardiac cause (Study 4 only)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hans Eiskjær, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aarhus University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital Department of Cardiology
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clemmensen TS, Logstrup BB, Eiskjaer H, Poulsen SH. Serial changes in longitudinal graft function and implications of acute cellular graft rejections during the first year after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;17(2):184-93. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev133. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
Di Lisa F, Bernardi P. Mitochondria and ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart: fixing a hole. Cardiovasc Res. 2006 May 1;70(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
DePasquale EC, Ardehali A. Primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018 Jun;23(3):286-294. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000523.
Sipahi I, Starling RC. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: an update. Heart Fail Clin. 2007 Jan;3(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2007.02.007.
Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Benden C, Dipchand AI, Goldfarb S, Levvey BJ, Meiser B, Rossano JW, Yusen RD, Stehlik J. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-second Official Adult Heart Transplantation Report--2015; Focus Theme: Early Graft Failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Oct;34(10):1244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 28. No abstract available.
Kobayashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Yang HM, Bouajila S, Luikart H, Nishi T, Choi DH, Schnittger I, Valantine HA, Khush KK, Yeung ACY, Haddad F, Fearon WF. Long-term prognostic value of invasive and non-invasive measures early after heart transplantation. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;260:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.070.
Schneeberger S, Amberger A, Mandl J, Hautz T, Renz O, Obrist P, Meusburger H, Brandacher G, Mark W, Strobl D, Troppmair J, Pratschke J, Margreiter R, Kuznetsov AV. Cold ischemia contributes to the development of chronic rejection and mitochondrial injury after cardiac transplantation. Transpl Int. 2010 Dec;23(12):1282-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01126.x.
Ventura-Clapier R, Garnier A, Veksler V. Energy metabolism in heart failure. J Physiol. 2004 Feb 15;555(Pt 1):1-13. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055095. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
Gvozdjakova A, Kucharska J, Mizera S, Braunova Z, Schreinerova Z, Schramekova E, Pechan I, Fabian J. Coenzyme Q10 depletion and mitochondrial energy disturbances in rejection development in patients after heart transplantation. Biofactors. 1999;9(2-4):301-6. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520090227.
Gormsen LC, Svart M, Thomsen HH, Sondergaard E, Vendelbo MH, Christensen N, Tolbod LP, Harms HJ, Nielsen R, Wiggers H, Jessen N, Hansen J, Botker HE, Moller N. Ketone Body Infusion With 3-Hydroxybutyrate Reduces Myocardial Glucose Uptake and Increases Blood Flow in Humans: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 27;6(3):e005066. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005066.
Brown DA, Perry JB, Allen ME, Sabbah HN, Stauffer BL, Shaikh SR, Cleland JG, Colucci WS, Butler J, Voors AA, Anker SD, Pitt B, Pieske B, Filippatos G, Greene SJ, Gheorghiade M. Expert consensus document: Mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target in heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Apr;14(4):238-250. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.203. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Jespersen NR, Yokota T, Stottrup NB, Bergdahl A, Paelestik KB, Povlsen JA, Dela F, Botker HE. Pre-ischaemic mitochondrial substrate constraint by inhibition of malate-aspartate shuttle preserves mitochondrial function after ischaemia-reperfusion. J Physiol. 2017 Jun 15;595(12):3765-3780. doi: 10.1113/JP273408. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Hansson NH, Harms HJ, Kim WY, Nielsen R, Tolbod LP, Frokiaer J, Bouchelouche K, Poulsen SH, Wiggers H, Parner ET, Sorensen J. Test-retest repeatability of myocardial oxidative metabolism and efficiency using standalone dynamic 11C-acetate PET and multimodality approaches in healthy controls. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Dec;25(6):1929-1936. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1302-z. Epub 2018 May 31.
Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A, Ensminger SM, Hiemann NE, Kobashigawa JA, Madsen J, Parameshwar J, Starling RC, Uber PA. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Jul;29(7):717-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-10-72-367-18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.