Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: Vojta Therapy vs Standard Treatment
NCT ID: NCT04102397
Last Updated: 2019-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Reflex Locomotion - or Vojta - Therapy, is a physiotherapeutic procedure that entails all the components of human locomotion. It consists of applying stimuli to certain areas of the body with the patient in various positions in order to produce a neurophysiological facilitation of both the central nervous system and the neuromuscular system, activating global and innate locomotive patterns or complexes, namely the Creeping Reflex and the Rolling Reflex. Both complexes provoke a certain coordination of striated muscle throughout the entire body. This enables a change from pathological patterns to alternative physiological patterns that are painless, efficient, and functional, by means of generating significant global effects, including the axial extension of the spine, correct positioning of the shoulder girdle, and activation of the abdominal musculature, all of which are altered by shoulder pathologies. Therefore, because of the high prevalence of IS and the lack of scientific studies on physiotherapeutic interventions on the shoulder, the investigators decided to conduct a clinical trial on the utility of Vojta Therapy in the treatment of IS. The investigators hoped to improve on the studies published to date, which vary greatly in methodological quality and use small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations. Moreover, no published studies have examined the use of Vojta Therapy in relation to shoulder pathologies in general, or to IS in particular.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Passive Mobilization in Patients With Subacromial Syndrome
NCT03568006
Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Group Versus Individual Therapy on Alternate Days in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT02833779
Dynamic Humeral Centering Exercises in Subacromial Pain Syndrome
NCT05892250
Comparison Between Subacromial Infiltrations
NCT03303001
Diacutaneous Fibrolysis and Subacromial Syndrome
NCT01424579
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Explanatory variables
* Sociodemographic: Gender, age, employment status, and type of work.
* Anthropometric: Weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2).
* Anamnesis: Dominant upper limb affected, tobacco use, current and/or previously suffered illnesses, surgical history of the shoulder, previous treatments of the shoulder and diagnostic tests conducted, analgesic use.
* Experimental treatment: Standard Therapy (ST) vs. Standard plus Vojta Therapy (SVT).
Administration and evaluation of therapy
* Initial evaluation: First, the evaluating physiotherapist took down the patient's medical history on an evaluation sheet; they then proceeded to administer the CMS and gave the patient the self-administered VAS and DAS scales, along with the SF-12 survey. Finally, a physiotherapist from the health clinic applied the assigned treatment (15 sessions for 3 weeks, independent of therapy type).
* Therapeutic intervention: experimental group vs active compared group.
* Second evaluation: After 15 sessions, carried out by the evaluating physiotherapist. Identical to the baseline evaluation.
* Third evaluation: Three months after the initial evaluation.
Validated measurement scales to evaluate results:
* VAS Scale: A universal method for evaluating pain, with maximum reproducibility among observers, a good relation to descriptive scales, and high sensitivity and reliability. The patient marks the pain intensity on a scale graded from 0 ("no pain") to 10 cm ("unbearable pain").
* DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) Questionnaire: The most commonly used questionnaire to globally evaluate the functionality of the upper limbs from the patient's perspective. It consists of 30 objective questions, has excellent reproducibility, high sensibility, good internal consistency, and a high sensitivity to changes. It is graded from 0 to 100 (with a higher score indicating greater disability).
* Constant-Murley Scale (CMS): An evaluation system of shoulder functionality more commonly used in Europe and the United States. It assesses pain, functionality, strength, and joint range of motion. The subjective assessment section evaluates pain, daily activities, and sleep disturbances (maximum score=35) while the objective assessment section measures joint range of motion (with a goniometer) and shoulder strength (with a dynamometer).
* SF-12 Health Survey: A shortened version of the SF-36, this survey has a high internal consistency, validity, and reliability. It is the most widely used health measurement in the medical field. Using 12 categories, it evaluates 8 positive and negative dimensions of physical and mental health, and, by extension, of quality of life: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The scale goes from 0 to 100 (the higher the score, the better the quality of life).
VAS, DASH, and SF-12 are all self-administered tests. They were given to each patient three times: after signing the informed consent form, at the end of the 15 therapy sessions, and 12 weeks after the start of the therapy. The CMS was likewise administered to each patient three times - the day of the initial evaluation, after 15 treatment sessions, and 12 weeks after the start of treatment - by 3 evaluating physiotherapists who had no knowledge of the assigned groups and who had not been involved with the patients' treatment. The evaluating therapists all had previous experience administering the CMS, thus guaranteeing interobserver validity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard plus Vojta therapy (SVT)
The physiotherapist's hands produce the activation with no need for medication or external equipment, thus guaranteeing the patient's safety.this therapy is able to change pathological patterns to painless patterns that reduce the use of energy caused by movement difficulty. The end result is to facilitate movement without strain.
Vojta therapy after standard therapy
Vojta Therapy \~20 minutes/session: Application of the Reflex Creeping complex, activating several stimulus points on the facial and the nuchal sides (Figure 3a), and then the activation of the Reflex Rolling complex in both the supine position and with the patient lying on his or her side, alternating between nuchal and facial stimulation and guiding from the head.
Standard therapy (ST)
It consists of one or more of the following procedures: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), ultrasound therapy, kinesiotherapy, and cryotherapy.
Standard therapy
\~50 minutes/session:
* TENS Current (20 minutes, phase duration=0.10 microseconds, frequency=50 Hz). The intensity applied depended on the patient's tolerance for the treatment (Figure 2a).
* Pulsating ultrasound (5 minutes around the shoulder, frequency=1MHz, intensity=1 W/cm2) (Figure 2b).
* Kinesiotherapy. In stages: at first assisted (with isometric exercises), then free, and finally, with resistance, usually with elastic bands (Figure 2c).
* Cryotherapy (5 minutes).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vojta therapy after standard therapy
Vojta Therapy \~20 minutes/session: Application of the Reflex Creeping complex, activating several stimulus points on the facial and the nuchal sides (Figure 3a), and then the activation of the Reflex Rolling complex in both the supine position and with the patient lying on his or her side, alternating between nuchal and facial stimulation and guiding from the head.
Standard therapy
\~50 minutes/session:
* TENS Current (20 minutes, phase duration=0.10 microseconds, frequency=50 Hz). The intensity applied depended on the patient's tolerance for the treatment (Figure 2a).
* Pulsating ultrasound (5 minutes around the shoulder, frequency=1MHz, intensity=1 W/cm2) (Figure 2b).
* Kinesiotherapy. In stages: at first assisted (with isometric exercises), then free, and finally, with resistance, usually with elastic bands (Figure 2c).
* Cryotherapy (5 minutes).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pain in active Abd (70-120º), considered impingement +.
* Pain on palpation of any of the following osteotendinous insertions: infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, subscapularis, and biceps.
* Pain in any of the following isometric contractions: Abd (first 10º), internal rotation (in the anatomical position and with 90º elbow flexion), and shoulder flexion.
* Positive on the Neer test.
* Positive on Hawkins test.
* Nighttime shoulder pain.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Complejo Hospitalario La Mancha Centro
OTHER
Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Inmaculada Tello Díaz-Maroto
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
Jorge Lucas Torres de la Guía
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centro de Salud Quintanar de la Orden
Carmen Jiménez-Antona
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Quintanar de la Orden, Toledo, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIS-VT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.