Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Subacromial Impingement

NCT ID: NCT00637013

Last Updated: 2024-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims at determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management of subacromial impingement (including partial tears) compared to conservative treatment. The research setting is prospective, randomised, and controlled.

The aim of the study is to search out evidence based data of indications for subacromial decompression. The investigators also aim at offering patients the most efficient and effective treatment and reduce the number of operations that do not have sufficient effectiveness. The data obtained will facilitate developing guidelines for referrals to a specialist when subacromial impingement is suspected.

The investigators hypothesise that there are subgroups of patients suffering from subacromial impingement that benefit from surgery whereas other subgroups are best treated conservatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subgroup analysis:

* age
* sex
* duration of symptoms
* presence of trauma before symptoms
* presence of partial tear
* degenerative findings
* other findings in MRI or arthroscopy
* type of operation
* co-morbidities
* occupation
* pain (VAS)
* objective shoulder function
* activities of daily living

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acromioplasty

Acromioplasty + physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acromioplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic or open acromioplasty

Physiotherapy

Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physiotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acromioplasty

Arthroscopic or open acromioplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Physiotherapy

Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Subacromial decompression Physical therapy Non-operative treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age over 35 years old
* duration of symptoms at least three months despite non-operative treatment
* accepts both treatment options (operative and physical therapy)
* must have pain in abduction of the shoulder
* must have painful arc
* must have pain in two of the three isometric tests (0 and 30 degrees of abduction, or external rotation)
* a positive result in the impingement test (a subacromial injection of lidocaine reduces pain)

Exclusion Criteria

* previous shoulder operations
* too high risk for operation
* any disease or social problem reducing the ability to co-operate
* rheumatoid arthritis
* severe arthrosis of the glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint
* a full-thickness rotator cuff tear in MRI arthrography
* a progressive malign disease
* adhesive capsulitis
* high-energy trauma before symptoms
* cervical syndrome
* shoulder instability
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academy of Finland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oulu University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central Finland Hospital District

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Juha Paloneva

Md, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Finland Health Care District, University of Eastern Finland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Helsinki

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Central Finland Health District

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu University Hospital

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Bohmer AS, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, Staff PH. Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):102-11. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90001-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10226960 (View on PubMed)

Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S, Holm EA, Andersen JH. Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):760-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.021188.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15834056 (View on PubMed)

Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Rousi T, Nissinen M, Huhtala H, Konttinen YT, Arnala I. No evidence of long-term benefits of arthroscopicacromioplasty in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Jul 1;2(7):132-9. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.27.2000163. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23836479 (View on PubMed)

Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1326-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22094.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19794168 (View on PubMed)

Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Exercises may be as efficient as subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial stage II impingement: 4-8-years' follow-up in a prospective, randomized study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):224-8. doi: 10.1080/03009740600556167.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16766370 (View on PubMed)

Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Elo P, Kortelainen S, Huhtala H, Arnala I. No difference in long-term development of rotator cuff rupture and muscle volumes in impingement patients with or without decompression. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):351-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1177780. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27348693 (View on PubMed)

Ketola S, Lehtinen JT, Arnala I. Arthroscopic decompression not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a final review of a randomised controlled trial at a minimum follow-up of ten years. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):799-805. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0569.R1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28566400 (View on PubMed)

Cederqvist S, Flinkkila T, Sormaala M, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Irmola T, Lehtokangas H, Liukkonen J, Pamilo K, Ridanpaa T, Sirnio K, Leppilahti J, Kiviranta I, Paloneva J. Non-surgical and surgical treatments for rotator cuff disease: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with 2-year follow-up after initial rehabilitation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):796-802. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219099. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33272959 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ksshp.fi/musculoskeletalresearch

Clinical Musculoskeletal Diseases Research Group internet pages

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B07103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A New Application in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT06324487 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA