Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-01
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The link between changes in eye characteristics (e.g. movement, pupil dilation) and cannabis use is documented (Peragallo et al. 2013), but insufficiently characterized. Certain outcomes of eye behavior are known to be affected by recent cannabis use (e.g. the eyes' ability to converge on a target; Stapleton et al 1986), while findings are mixed regarding other outcomes (e.g. the eyes' ability to smoothly follow a target; Fant et al. 1998). Thus, the goal of this study is to identify a characteristic pattern of eye behavior, defined by performance on a battery of four eye tasks, as a function of recent cannabis use (7% vs. 0% THC).
Using 30 healthy cannabis users (15 men, 15 women), this study will be one of the first to assess changes in eye behavior as a function of recent cannabis use within a quantified virtual reality (VR) environment. This study will examine the effect of smoked cannabis (7% vs. 0% THC) on individual eye movements, with the goal of defining the utility of the eyes as potential objective indicators of cannabis use and intoxication. Four eye tests (nystagmus, smooth pursuit, convergence, and pupillary light response; outlined below), which previous literature has defined as effective in detecting recent drug use (including opioids and alcohol; Murillo et al. 2004), have been compiled into a 5-minute task battery using a VR headset environment equipped with high frequency infrared eye trackers (the HTC Vive with Pupil Labs Tracking). This 5-minute VR battery of four eye tests will be administered prior to cannabis consumption as a baseline, and then at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, and 165 min after cannabis, with the goal of comparing baseline values to the ten post-cannabis timepoints to detect changes in eye behavior as a function of cannabis intoxication. The study will also utilize a battery of subjective-effects and mood visual analogue scales (0-100 mm; e.g. 'Good Drug Effect') prior to the eye test battery at each timepoint, allowing us to correlate each outcome of the eye tasks to subjectively reported cannabis impairment and mood.
In addition to measuring eye behavior as a function of cannabis use, the training session of this study will be used to also collect exploratory data on the relationship between pupil dilation and experimental pain. Using Quantitative Sensory Testing (Medoc TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer), thermal pain threshold and tolerance will be induced using a cold stimulus (4.0°C; induced with a 30 x 30 mm Peltier thermode, which is 1.5" square metal applicator that is connected to the TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer device and software, and produces an ongoing cold sensation applied to the lower palm of the participant's non-dominant hand). Participants will indicate first feelings of pain (pain threshold), and when the pain becomes too much to bear (pain tolerance) by pressing a button on a controller connected to the TSA-II. Throughout exposure to the cold stimulus, changes in pupil size to the patient's subjectively reported pain latencies will be recorded.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detection of Cannabis Impairment With an Eye Tracker
NCT03813602
Cannabis Impairment Detection Device Study
NCT07122349
Differences in Cannabis Impairment and Its Measurement Due to Route of Administration
NCT03122691
Brain Imaging of Cannabinoid Receptors
NCT03204305
Facilitating the Behavioral Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder
NCT02946489
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Cannabis
In this session, the participant will smoke two-thirds of one active cannabis cigarette (7% THC) according to our paced-puff procedure (Foltin et al. 1987). They will complete an eye task battery (5 minutes per battery) 15 minutes prior to smoking as a baseline measure in each session, and again at the following timepoints: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, and 165 minutes post-cannabis. Baseline assessments will be compared to those at post-cannabis timepoints.
Cannabis
Smoked active cannabis (7% THC) vs. placebo inactive cannabis (0% THC)
Placebo Cannabis
In this session, the participant will smoke two-thirds of one inactive placebo cannabis cigarette (0% THC) according to our paced-puff procedure (Foltin et al. 1987). They will complete an eye task battery (5 minutes per battery) 15 minutes prior to smoking as a baseline measure in each session, and again at the following timepoints: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, and 165 minutes post-cannabis. Baseline assessments will be compared to those at post-cannabis timepoints.
Cannabis
Smoked active cannabis (7% THC) vs. placebo inactive cannabis (0% THC)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cannabis
Smoked active cannabis (7% THC) vs. placebo inactive cannabis (0% THC)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Report smoking cannabis ≥1 day per week
* Able to perform all study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of illicit drugs ≥1 day/week in the prior 4 weeks
* Abnormality with the eyes which may affect the eye tracking technology such as color blindness, naturally occurring nystagmus, amblyopia, strabismus, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataract, diabetic eye disease, glaucoma, dry eye, extreme refractive error, bacterial or viral infections of the eye
* 7\. User of supplemental oxygen
21 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New York State Psychiatric Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caroline A. Arout, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Neurobiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7844
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.