Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
718 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-17
2023-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Prevent Anal Cancer Self-Swab Study
NCT03489707
The Feasibility of Self or Partner-assisted Digital Anal Exam Screening
NCT02384005
Anal Cancer Screening Study
NCT00914537
Assessing Drivers and Barriers to Follow-Up Screening for Anal Cancer in Men Who Have Sex With Men
NCT00501306
Self-sampling to Optimize Anal Lesion Outcomes
NCT07192055
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The long-term goal of this study is to decrease morbidity and mortality from anal cancer by increasing detection of anal canal tumors through self- or partner-palpation of the anal canal. Preliminary data indicate these exams are feasible and highly acceptable among MSM. In a diverse sample of 200 MSM, 93% of men correctly classified their anal self-exam (ASE) or anal companion exam (ACE) as either normal or abnormal, and 94% said the exams were acceptable. Given these findings, our overall objective is to determine the viability of the ASE and ACE by assessing exam accuracy and consistency of results in two clinic sites. Accuracy will be defined as concordance between clinician DARE and participant exam. The central hypothesis is that both ASE and ACE at visit 1 will have ≥70% sensitivity and ≥90% specificity using the clinician DARE as the gold standard at each of two visits. We will test the hypothesis with three specific aims: 1) Estimate ASE and ACE sensitivity and specificity; 2) Determine independent factors associated with ASE and ACE concordance; and 3) Determine the impact of ASE, ACE, and DARE on survival and quality of life, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these strategies among HIV+ and HIV- MSM and transgender persons. The aims will be accomplished with a study in Houston and Chicago with a sample of 100 couples (i.e., 200 partners) and 600 single persons (one-half HIV-positive), aged \>=25 years, who will perform a clinician-taught ASE or ACE. The individual's ASE and partner's ACE will then be compared with the clinician's DARE. The assessment will be done at each of two visits, spaced six-months apart, to assess retention of exam accuracy.
At the end of visit 1, one-half of participants, i.e., 300 individuals and 50 couples (stratified by city) will be randomly selected and encouraged to practice the ASE/ACE three months before Visit 2. Study staff will make reminder calls (or emails/texts) and follow-up calls for the scheduled practice session. At the follow-up calls, study staff will record the participant's result for the self/companion exam and the level of anxiety and pain, if any, associated with the exam. If the participant reports more than minimal pain and anxiety, they will be asked to return to the clinic for an exam. Regardless of prior results, all persons will be asked to return for Visit 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Practice Self-/Companion Exams
300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to practice arm.
Practice Self-/Companion Exams
300 men and 50 couples will be randomized and encouraged to practice anal exams at home before Visit 2. Practice results will be elicited by staff. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). At Visit 2, they will complete a pre- and post-visit computer assisted self-interview. They will receive written instructions. After completing an anal self-exam or anal companion exam at home, they will record the results. At the clinic, they will have a Digital Anal Rectal Exam (DARE) by a clinician who will give the subject his results.
Control Arm
300 individuals and 50 couples will neither be encouraged nor discouraged to practice self-/companion exam.
Control Arm
300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to this arm. Following Visit 1, they will neither be encouraged nor discouraged from practicing self- or companion exam. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). They will receive written anal exam instructions. They will then complete the self- or companion exam at home, and record the results. At the clinic, they will receive a clinician DARE. Clinicians will give DARE results. Persons will take a post-exam computer-assisted self-interview. Persons in this arm (control) will be asked if they have performed exams between visits.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Practice Self-/Companion Exams
300 men and 50 couples will be randomized and encouraged to practice anal exams at home before Visit 2. Practice results will be elicited by staff. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). At Visit 2, they will complete a pre- and post-visit computer assisted self-interview. They will receive written instructions. After completing an anal self-exam or anal companion exam at home, they will record the results. At the clinic, they will have a Digital Anal Rectal Exam (DARE) by a clinician who will give the subject his results.
Control Arm
300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to this arm. Following Visit 1, they will neither be encouraged nor discouraged from practicing self- or companion exam. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). They will receive written anal exam instructions. They will then complete the self- or companion exam at home, and record the results. At the clinic, they will receive a clinician DARE. Clinicians will give DARE results. Persons will take a post-exam computer-assisted self-interview. Persons in this arm (control) will be asked if they have performed exams between visits.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Persons who had sex with men in the prior five years
* Cis-gendered men and transgender persons
* Age: 25 years and over
* Access to medical care for referral or treatment
* Spanish or English speakers/readers
* Individuals or couples
* HIV+ or HIV-
* Persons with or without comorbidities and physical disabilities
Exclusion Criteria
* DARE in the prior three months
* Plans to move in the following six months
25 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chicago
OTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Gordon Crofoot MD PA
UNKNOWN
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alan Nyitray, PhD
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alan Nyitray, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Gordon Crofoot MD
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nyitray AG, Rosser BRS, Hazra A, Nitkowski J, Smith D, Brzezinski B, Ridolfi TJ, Schneider JA, Chiao EY, Sanos S, Mkonyi E, Mgopa L, Ross MW. Factors associated with decreased anal sphincter tone and the accuracy of forced anal examinations to detect individuals having receptive anal intercourse: an observational study. BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jul 12;2(1):e001039. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001039. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Nyitray AG, Rosser BRS, Hazra A, Nitkowski J, Smith D, Brzezinski B, Ridolfi TJ, Schneider JA, Chiao EY, Sanos S, Mkonyi E, Mgopa LR, Ross MW. Factors associated with decreased anal sphincter tone and the accuracy of forced anal examinations to detect individuals having receptive anal intercourse: An observational study. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Feb 1:2024.01.31.24302098. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.31.24302098.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00033000
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.