The Prevent Anal Cancer Palpation Study

NCT ID: NCT04090060

Last Updated: 2024-07-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

718 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-17

Study Completion Date

2023-06-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anal cancer is a common cancer among men having sex with men (MSM). We will investigate increasing detection of anal canal tumors through self- or partner-palpation of the anal canal among MSM and trans persons. This study in Houston and Chicago will recruit a sample of 100 couples (i.e., 200 partners) and 600 single persons (one-half HIV-positive), aged ≥ 25 years, who will be taught to perform an ASE or ACE. After performing the exam in private, the individual's ASE and partner's ACE will then be compared with a clinician's DARE. The assessment will be done at each of two visits, spaced 6-months apart. One-half of persons will be randomized to a practice condition to assess how practice affects accuracy and retention of exam procedure. Our hypothesis is that both ASE and ACE at visit 1 will have ≥70% sensitivity and ≥90% specificity using the clinician DARE as the gold standard at each of two visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Even though expert opinion recommends annual digital ano-rectal exams (DARE) for detection of anal cancer tumors among men having sex with men (MSM), the procedure is severely underutilized by clinicians and it is not known how to increase utilization. This is problematic in the context of an extremely high incidence of anal cancer among MSM, no proven treatment for anal precancerous lesions, and lack of screening infrastructure for detecting precancerous lesions, even in high-resource countries.

The long-term goal of this study is to decrease morbidity and mortality from anal cancer by increasing detection of anal canal tumors through self- or partner-palpation of the anal canal. Preliminary data indicate these exams are feasible and highly acceptable among MSM. In a diverse sample of 200 MSM, 93% of men correctly classified their anal self-exam (ASE) or anal companion exam (ACE) as either normal or abnormal, and 94% said the exams were acceptable. Given these findings, our overall objective is to determine the viability of the ASE and ACE by assessing exam accuracy and consistency of results in two clinic sites. Accuracy will be defined as concordance between clinician DARE and participant exam. The central hypothesis is that both ASE and ACE at visit 1 will have ≥70% sensitivity and ≥90% specificity using the clinician DARE as the gold standard at each of two visits. We will test the hypothesis with three specific aims: 1) Estimate ASE and ACE sensitivity and specificity; 2) Determine independent factors associated with ASE and ACE concordance; and 3) Determine the impact of ASE, ACE, and DARE on survival and quality of life, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these strategies among HIV+ and HIV- MSM and transgender persons. The aims will be accomplished with a study in Houston and Chicago with a sample of 100 couples (i.e., 200 partners) and 600 single persons (one-half HIV-positive), aged \>=25 years, who will perform a clinician-taught ASE or ACE. The individual's ASE and partner's ACE will then be compared with the clinician's DARE. The assessment will be done at each of two visits, spaced six-months apart, to assess retention of exam accuracy.

At the end of visit 1, one-half of participants, i.e., 300 individuals and 50 couples (stratified by city) will be randomly selected and encouraged to practice the ASE/ACE three months before Visit 2. Study staff will make reminder calls (or emails/texts) and follow-up calls for the scheduled practice session. At the follow-up calls, study staff will record the participant's result for the self/companion exam and the level of anxiety and pain, if any, associated with the exam. If the participant reports more than minimal pain and anxiety, they will be asked to return to the clinic for an exam. Regardless of prior results, all persons will be asked to return for Visit 2.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects will be randomly assigned to groups encouraged to practice anal examination (Experimental) or not encouraged to practice anal examinations (Control).
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Practice Self-/Companion Exams

300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to practice arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Practice Self-/Companion Exams

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

300 men and 50 couples will be randomized and encouraged to practice anal exams at home before Visit 2. Practice results will be elicited by staff. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). At Visit 2, they will complete a pre- and post-visit computer assisted self-interview. They will receive written instructions. After completing an anal self-exam or anal companion exam at home, they will record the results. At the clinic, they will have a Digital Anal Rectal Exam (DARE) by a clinician who will give the subject his results.

Control Arm

300 individuals and 50 couples will neither be encouraged nor discouraged to practice self-/companion exam.

Group Type OTHER

Control Arm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to this arm. Following Visit 1, they will neither be encouraged nor discouraged from practicing self- or companion exam. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). They will receive written anal exam instructions. They will then complete the self- or companion exam at home, and record the results. At the clinic, they will receive a clinician DARE. Clinicians will give DARE results. Persons will take a post-exam computer-assisted self-interview. Persons in this arm (control) will be asked if they have performed exams between visits.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Practice Self-/Companion Exams

300 men and 50 couples will be randomized and encouraged to practice anal exams at home before Visit 2. Practice results will be elicited by staff. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). At Visit 2, they will complete a pre- and post-visit computer assisted self-interview. They will receive written instructions. After completing an anal self-exam or anal companion exam at home, they will record the results. At the clinic, they will have a Digital Anal Rectal Exam (DARE) by a clinician who will give the subject his results.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control Arm

300 individuals and 50 couples will be randomized to this arm. Following Visit 1, they will neither be encouraged nor discouraged from practicing self- or companion exam. They will return for Visit 2 (six months after Visit 1). They will receive written anal exam instructions. They will then complete the self- or companion exam at home, and record the results. At the clinic, they will receive a clinician DARE. Clinicians will give DARE results. Persons will take a post-exam computer-assisted self-interview. Persons in this arm (control) will be asked if they have performed exams between visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chicago or Houston Metro Residents
* Persons who had sex with men in the prior five years
* Cis-gendered men and transgender persons
* Age: 25 years and over
* Access to medical care for referral or treatment
* Spanish or English speakers/readers
* Individuals or couples
* HIV+ or HIV-
* Persons with or without comorbidities and physical disabilities

Exclusion Criteria

* Unresolved health care provider's diagnosis of anal condyloma, hemorrhoids or anal cancer
* DARE in the prior three months
* Plans to move in the following six months
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gordon Crofoot MD PA

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alan Nyitray, PhD

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alan Nyitray, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Wisconsin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Gordon Crofoot MD

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nyitray AG, Rosser BRS, Hazra A, Nitkowski J, Smith D, Brzezinski B, Ridolfi TJ, Schneider JA, Chiao EY, Sanos S, Mkonyi E, Mgopa L, Ross MW. Factors associated with decreased anal sphincter tone and the accuracy of forced anal examinations to detect individuals having receptive anal intercourse: an observational study. BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jul 12;2(1):e001039. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001039. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40018098 (View on PubMed)

Nyitray AG, Rosser BRS, Hazra A, Nitkowski J, Smith D, Brzezinski B, Ridolfi TJ, Schneider JA, Chiao EY, Sanos S, Mkonyi E, Mgopa LR, Ross MW. Factors associated with decreased anal sphincter tone and the accuracy of forced anal examinations to detect individuals having receptive anal intercourse: An observational study. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Feb 1:2024.01.31.24302098. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.31.24302098.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38352524 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01CA232892-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

PRO00033000

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer
NCT02863107 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Assessing Repeat Fit Testing for CRC
NCT03248661 COMPLETED PHASE3