Host Genome Methylation: a Screening Tool in Anal Cancer Detection

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

770 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-22

Study Completion Date

2028-11-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In January 2023, the first recommendations for anal cancer screening were issued by the French National Society of Coloproctology (SNFCP). These were the world's first national recommendations for anal cancer screening for at-risk patients, not limited to people living with HIV. They are based on screening for papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) as the first line of defence, followed by reflex cytology in the event of a positive HPV16 smear and a proctological examination. In the event of abnormal cytology or proctological examination, high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) should be performed, but access to it is limited by the number of proctologists with the expertise to carry out this examination and the cost of the equipment. The development of biological markers could enable only patients at high risk of high-grade dysplasia/anal cancer to be referred for HRA.

As part of the AIN3 cohort, we demonstrated that the markers ZNF582 and ASCL1, studied on anal smears taken when patients were included in the cohort, showed a significantly higher level of methylation in patients who subsequently progressed to anal cancer.

The aim of this project is to test, in real-life conditions, the contribution of these methylation markers in the triage of asymptomatic patients eligible for anal cancer screening according to the SNFCP guidelines (MSM over 30 years of age living with HIV, women with a history of vulvar lesions or vulvar, women patients who have had a solid organ transplant for more than 10 years and extension to men patients who have had a solid organ transplant for more than 10 years).

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Anal Cancer Screening Study

NCT00914537

Anal Cancer

COMPLETED

Seville Cohort of People Living With HIV at Risk for Anal Cancer

NCT03713229

Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

A Study of Anal Cancer Development in HIV Infected People

NCT00107679

HIV Infections Anus Neoplasms

COMPLETED

Anal High-risk HPV, HSIL, and Microbiome Among Hispanic Peoples Living With HIV (PLWH)

NCT06651957

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Human Papillomavirus-Related Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

COMPLETED

Screening Strategies Among High-risk Populations for Anal Cancer

NCT06628570

Neoplasms HPV-Related Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

I. Current state of knowledge on the pathology

In 2020, 30,000 cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus were reported worldwide. These cancers affect women in 2/3 of cases. They are fairly rare in the general population, with an age-standardised incidence rate of 0.35 per 100,000 person-years (p.a.) in men and 0.57 in women.

The population of men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV is at greater risk of anal cancer: studies in 2012 reported an 80-fold increase in the relative risk compared with the non-HIV-infected male population. This population is also more exposed to anal HPV infections, which adds to the dysimmunity associated with HIV infection. As a result, this population was already the subject of specific recommendations concerning anal canal cancer screening based on cytology. A recent meta-analysis has stratified the risk of anal cancer in different populations. It confirms the excess risk of anal cancer in the MSM population living with HIV (up to 100 per 100,000 pa in MSM living with HIV aged over 45).

It has also identified other groups at risk of anal cancer. A higher incidence rate of anal cancer in women who have already had cervical or vulvovaginal cancer is clearly established. But this meta-analysis by Clifford et al. shows a different stratification of anal cancer risk according to the type of previous HPV-induced cancer. Thus, the incidence rate of anal cancer is highest in the case of a history of vulvar cancer, equal to 50 per 100,000 pa, whereas it is close to 10 per 100,000 pa in the case of a history of vaginal or cervical cancers. Another group at risk of anal cancer is made up of immunosuppressed people not infected with HIV, and in particular solid transplant recipients, with different incidence rates of anal cancer depending on the type of transplant and above all the time since the transplant.

Overall, incidence rates of anal cancer, regardless of sex, are higher in high-income countries. In 2018, 1,532 new cases of anal cancer were reported in women in France, corresponding to an incidence rate of 2.4 per 100,000 woman-years, and 479 new cases in men, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.8 per 100,000 man-years. As in many high-income countries, an overall increase in the incidence of this cancer has been observed in France, both in women (+3.4% and +5.7% between 1990 and 2018 and between 2010 and 2018 respectively) and in men (+1.5% and +3.3% between 1990 and 2018 and between 2010 and 2018 respectively). Trends by age for anal cancer show an increase in the number of cases, mainly in women aged 50 and 60.

Analysis of human genome methylation in anal swabs is a promising biomarker for anal cancer risk. Methylation is an epigenetic physiological phenomenon that regulates the expression of certain genes. The viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 of high-risk oncogenic HPVs (notably HPV16) have been shown to induce activation or increased expression of the cellular enzymes responsible for these methylation phenomena. As a general rule, hypermethylation of gene promoters leads to their inactivation. Repression of genes involved in the antiviral or anti-tumour response may contribute to immune escape, whereas hypermethylation inducing repression of tumour suppressor genes favours the cancerous process.

With regard to anal cancer, two studies demonstrated that the methylation markers previously developed for the cervix were not discriminatory for anal cancer. Subsequently, cross-sectional analysis of anal biopsies at different stages (normal cytology, low-grade or high-grade lesions, cancer) has revealed methylation markers specific to anal carcinogenesis in anal biopsies (invasive tissue sampling).

These markers are extremely promising, and methylation could therefore constitute a robust predictive marker of progression to an invasive lesion, and would therefore be a decisive factor in the decision of invasive treatment versus surveillance.

II. State of knowledge on reference procedures

The evolution of anal pre-cancerous lesions is less well described than that of cervical lesions due to the absence of screening programmes to date.

For the first time, the American ANCHOR study of nearly 5,000 PLHIV demonstrated the impact of treatment of high-grade lesions, with a 57% reduction in the rate of cancer in the treated arm (incidence 173 per 100,000 pa vs 402 per 100,000 pa in the simple surveillance arm). Following this study, recommendations for screening for precancerous anal lesions in asymptomatic at-risk populations are beginning to emerge.

In January 2023, the French National Society of Colo-Proctology (SNFCP) issued recommendations for anal cancer screening of asymptomatic individuals in three at-risk populations: MSM living with HIV aged over 30, women with a history of pre-cancerous lesion or cancer of the vulva and women who have received a solid organ transplant for more than 10 years. These recommendations target populations with an incidence of anal cancer greater than 40 per 100,000 pa according to the meta-analysis by Clifford et al. In this context, screening for anal cancer is based on primary HPV16 screening, in particular by anal self-sampling and, if positive, an anal smear for cytology and a standard proctology examination. In the event of abnormal cytology, patients will be referred for a proctology consultation with high-resolution anoscopy (HRA).

There are few proctologists in France who carry out AHR examinations, and waiting times for consultations are already very high. The major stumbling block to the introduction of anal cancer screening is the anticipated worsening of the overcrowding of AHR examinations and proctology consultations. For example, a recent meta-analysis reported a prevalence of 27% to 35% of HPV16 infection in the anal region of MSM living with HIV. The development of triage tools enabling only those patients most at risk of high-grade anal dysplasia to be referred for this examination is therefore crucial.

The aim of this new study is to validate the predictive capacity of anal smear methylation markers for screening patients at risk of progressing to high-grade dysplasia and to define appropriate thresholds in this sample, including patients targeted by the new SNFCP screening recommendations and therefore with no history of AIN3 lesions.

III. Hypothesis

This study is based on the hypothesis that the level of methylation of the markers ASCL1 and ZNF582 will be predictive of the risk of asymptomatic patients developing high-grade anal lesions and therefore anal cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This study focuses on diagnostic and prognostic research for high-grade precancerous anal lesions. It is a prospective, single-centre, diagnostic and prognostic cohort study.

Follow-up will vary depending on the HPV 16 result, but there is only one arm: cohort study.

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort

Patient HPV16 + at inclusion :

* Cytological analysis of the smear
* Referral to proctology (recommendation): Standard proctological examination Additional self-samples will be taken at 1 year (M12), 2 years (M24) and 3 years (M36 - end of follow-up) during a visit as part of standard care Questionnaire carried out at 1 year (M12), 2 years (M24) and 3 years (M36 - end of follow-up) during a visit as part of standard care

And if cytology positive or if anal symptoms :

* Standard proctological examination
* Anal smear at clinician's discretion (virological analysis)
* Anal biopsy if necessary (cytological analysis)
* AHR (high-resolution anoscopy)

Patient HPV16 - at inclusion :

* Additional self-sampling at 3 years during a visit as part of standard care
* Questionnaire carried out at 3 years during a visit as part of standard care And if anal symptom
* Standard proctological examination, Anal smear, AHR at clinician's discretion
* Anal biopsy if necessary

Group Type OTHER

Anal self-sampling (smear)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anal self-sampling (smear) at M12, M24 and M36 (each year) for HPV16+ patients at M0 and anal self-sampling (smear) at M36 for HPV16- at M0

HPV questionnaire

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

HPV questionnaire at each visit M0, M12, M24 and M36 for HPV16-positive patients at M0 and HPV questionnaire at each visit M0, 4 and M36 for HPV16-negative patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anal self-sampling (smear)

Anal self-sampling (smear) at M12, M24 and M36 (each year) for HPV16+ patients at M0 and anal self-sampling (smear) at M36 for HPV16- at M0

Intervention Type DEVICE

HPV questionnaire

HPV questionnaire at each visit M0, M12, M24 and M36 for HPV16-positive patients at M0 and HPV questionnaire at each visit M0, 4 and M36 for HPV16-negative patients

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults (age ≥ 18 years)
2. Eligible for anal cancer screening according to the SNFCP guidelines (with extension to men who have received solid organ transplants for more than 10 years):

* MSM (men who have sex with men) aged over 30 living with HIV
* Patients who have received a solid organ transplant for more than 10 years
* Women with a history of vulvar lesions or vulvar cancer

1. Proctological follow-up for a current high-grade anal lesion or cancer
2. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
3. Subject deprived of liberty or under legal protection
4. Non-affiliation with social security system
5. Refusal to participate expressed by the patient

Exclusion Criteria

1\) Refusal of anal self-sampling on inclusion

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.