Focal Muscular Vibration to Treat Upper Limb Spasticity in Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04087928

Last Updated: 2020-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-16

Study Completion Date

2019-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spasticity following stroke is one of the most debilitating conditions and has a negative influence on the autonomy and quality of life, and greatly worsens the patient's degree of disability. Focal muscular vibration (FMV) is a non-invasive technique to treat spasticity. Has been showed the positive effects of FMV on spasticity in stroke subjects. FMV has been investigated on the antagonist muscle, as well as directly on the spastic muscle, showing in both cases a significant reduction in spasticity. However, isn't unclear which is the most effective in the treatment of spasticity.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of FMV of the muscles of the upper limb in subjects with subacute stroke, comparing the effects obtained by treating the spastic muscles directly versus to those obtained by treating the respective antagonist muscles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is the major cause of permanent disability with an incidence in Italy of 293 affected persons per 100,000 inhabitants. The onset of spasticity following stroke (20-46%) is one of the most disabling conditions and has a negative influence on the patient's autonomy and quality of life.

The development of spasticity during the rehabilitation process of these patients is a very limiting factor for the functional recovery of the affected side. The onset of spasticity considerably worsens the patient's degree of disability.

Focal muscular vibration (FMV) is a non-invasive technique to treat spasticity. Has been showed the positive effects of FMV on spasticity in stroke subjects.

Introduced by Hagbarth and Eklund at the end of the 1960s, it is based on the tonic-vibratory reflex. Based on this mechanism, some authors suggest that the FMV should be applied to the antagonist muscle in order to obtain a significant reduction in spasticity. However the literature shows a reduction in spasticity through the application of FMV directly on the spastic muscle. These effects seem to be related to the stimulation of cortical motor areas. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which approach is most effective in treating of spasticity.

Stroke is a very common pathology, as well as a rehabilitative and social problem which also affects welfare. Considering prevalence of spasticity in stroke patients and the effects on their functional recovery, it is important to identify the most effective treatment to guarantee a more suitable rehabilitation process. In addition to this, it is worth remembering that FMV is less invasive and has lower costs than botulinum toxin, the current gold standard in the treatment of spasticity.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of FMV of the muscles of the upper limb in subjects with subacute stroke, comparing the effects obtained by treating the spastic muscles directly versus to those obtained by treating the respective antagonist muscles. Specifically, the two approaches will be compared on: (i) the reduction of the degree of spasticity, assessed by clinical scales and with an instrumental protocol; (ii) motor performance of the patient, using a robotic system; (iii) pain reduction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group Flexors (A)

Group A was treated by applying FMV to the flexor muscles of the upper limb (brachial biceps and carpal flexors). Patients will be treated with FMV for three consecutive days: each session consisted of three sessions of 10 minutes each, interspersed with one minute of rest. A vibration frequency of 100 Hz has been applied, according to the literature.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FMV_flex

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fisiocomputer EVM (Endomedica, Italy) for application of FMV to flexor muscles of the upper limb (brachial biceps and carpal flexors).

Group Extensors (B)

Group b was treated by applying FMV to the extensors muscles of the upper limb (triceps brachial and carpus extensors). Patients will be treated with FMV for three consecutive days: each session consisted of three sessions of 10 minutes each, interspersed with one minute of rest. A vibration frequency of 100 Hz has been applied, according to the literature.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FMV_ext

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fisiocomputer EVM (Endomedica, Italy) for application of FMV to extensors muscles of the upper limb (triceps brachial and carpus extensors).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FMV_flex

Fisiocomputer EVM (Endomedica, Italy) for application of FMV to flexor muscles of the upper limb (brachial biceps and carpal flexors).

Intervention Type DEVICE

FMV_ext

Fisiocomputer EVM (Endomedica, Italy) for application of FMV to extensors muscles of the upper limb (triceps brachial and carpus extensors).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* first cerebral stroke
* 2 weeks up to 12 months post the acute event (subacute patients)
* age between 35-80 years
* single cortical or subcortical event
* spastic paresis of the upper limb (Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥ 2)
* ability to give written consent
* compliance with the study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* comorbidities affecting the paretic upper limb (fractures, trauma or peripheral neuropathies)
* cognitive and/or communicative disability (e.g. due to brain injury): inability to understand the instructions required for the study
* treatment with focal or systemic antispastic drugs (i.e. baclofen, thiocolchicoside, tizanidine).
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Irene Giovanna Aprile

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Irene Aprile, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Irene Aprile

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murillo N, Valls-Sole J, Vidal J, Opisso E, Medina J, Kumru H. Focal vibration in neurorehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;50(2):231-42.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24842220 (View on PubMed)

Hagbarth KE, Eklund G. Tonic vibration reflexes (TVR) in spasticity. Brain Res. 1966 Aug;2(2):201-3. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(66)90029-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 5968925 (View on PubMed)

Ageranoti SA, Hayes KC. Effects of vibration on hypertonia and hyperreflexia in the wrist joint of patients with spastic hemiparesis. Physiotherapy Canada 1990;42:24-33.

Reference Type RESULT

Liepert J, Binder C. Vibration-induced effects in stroke patients with spastic hemiparesis--a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(6):729-35. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0541.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21209488 (View on PubMed)

Noma T, Matsumoto S, Shimodozono M, Etoh S, Kawahira K. Anti-spastic effects of the direct application of vibratory stimuli to the spastic muscles of hemiplegic limbs in post-stroke patients: a proof-of-principle study. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Apr;44(4):325-30. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0946.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22402727 (View on PubMed)

Caliandro P, Celletti C, Padua L, Minciotti I, Russo G, Granata G, La Torre G, Granieri E, Camerota F. Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;93(9):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22507444 (View on PubMed)

Shaw L, Rodgers H, Price C, van Wijck F, Shackley P, Steen N, Barnes M, Ford G, Graham L; BoTULS investigators. BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A. Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(26):1-113, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14260.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20515600 (View on PubMed)

Aprile I, Di Sipio E, Germanotta M, Simbolotti C, Padua L. Muscle focal vibration in healthy subjects: evaluation of the effects on upper limb motor performance measured using a robotic device. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Apr;116(4):729-37. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3330-1. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26818756 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMV_2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nerve Transfers in Post-stroke Spasticity
NCT04437056 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA