Focal Muscle Vibration on Upper Limb Function in Subacute Post-stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT04289766
Last Updated: 2021-04-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
106 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-26
2021-04-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Combined Segmental Vibrator and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Subacute Stroke
NCT06686303
Segmental Vibrator With NMES on Lower Limb Function in Subacute Stroke
NCT06927206
Effects of Accelerated Skill Acquisition Programme With Segmental Vibration on Upper Limb in Stroke.
NCT07128823
Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration Versus Whole Upper Limb Vibration in Post-Stroke Patients
NCT07340034
Neural Mobilization With Task Based Activities on Upper Limb in Patients With Chronic Stroke.
NCT06131827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2019 segmental muscle vibration(SMV) used to improve upper extremity functional ability post stroke and concluded that patients in both groups improved significantly after treatment in Barthel index (BI), elbow Range of Motion (ROM) and elbow muscle strength. However muscle tone in elbow joint of hemiplegic upper extremity improved significantly after only in the experimental group. They suggested that with routine physiotherapy with extended exposure SMV will results in significant reduced spasticity and better improved Activities Of Daily Livings (ADLs).
In 2019 a work done with SMV to improve gate performance in patients with foot drop after chronic stroke. Results of this study revealed moderate improvement in mean gate speed, normal side swing velocity, bilateral stride length and normal-side toe off in experimental group. Further studies needed to evaluate the optimal and minimum SMV dosage.
Another study conducted in 2019 to see Results show that processing speed, inhibitory control and attention improved following SMV. But working memory between groups and also not show a association between executive functions course and fall risk, so they suggest further work to examine effects of vibration therapy on executive functions.
In 2014 another therapist highlight the potential use of SMV to modulate electromyographic (EMG) for reaching movement in chronic stroke patients but needs to be confirmed by larger control perspective trials of SMV.
In 2019 combined work done with repetitive focal muscle vibration with physiotherapy to improve the motor function even in very acute phase of stroke and finds it a valid complementary non pharmacological therapy In 2019 another study suggest that Whole Body Vibration (WBV) and Upper and Lower Cycle (ULC) effective upper for upper extremity motor function and grip strength in sub-acute stroke.
In 2019 a study reported the risk factors (vibration injury to hands vascular components, intermediate blanching neurological components and lower back pain for drivers of work machines) and benefits (improvement in bone health and neuromuscular function). So is a room for research to design a balanced WBV protocol.
A study in 2018 did a meta-analysis and compare the effects of WBV in stroke patients and concludes that it is a safe therapeutic method for improving symptoms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Treatment
Conventional Treatment includes exercises limbs
Conventional Treatment
These individuals will receive the conventional intervention including the routine rehabilitation therapy like active and passive ROMs, stretching, strengthening of upper limb, balance improvement exercises. Time duration is of 40 minute 3 times per week.
Focal Muscle Vibration (120Hz)
* Each session will span 40 minutes plus 10 of Focal Muscle vibration for each muscle at a frequency of 120 Hz.
* Conventional Treatment
Focal Muscle Vibration (120Hz)
These individuals will receive conventional therapy along with Focal Muscle Vibration applied to the hyper toned muscles (Bicep Brachialis and Extensor Carpi Radialis). Evaluation at baseline and after the end session (Total 24 session). i.e. 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
Focal Muscle Vibration (60Hz)
* Each session will span 40 minutes plus 10 of Focal Muscle vibration for each muscle at a frequency of 60 Hz.
* Conventional Treatment
Focal Muscle Vibration (60Hz)
These individuals will receive conventional therapy along with Focal Muscle Vibration applied to the hyper toned muscles (Bicep Brachialis and Extensor Carpi Radialis). Evaluation at baseline and after the end session (Total 24 session). i.e. 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional Treatment
These individuals will receive the conventional intervention including the routine rehabilitation therapy like active and passive ROMs, stretching, strengthening of upper limb, balance improvement exercises. Time duration is of 40 minute 3 times per week.
Focal Muscle Vibration (120Hz)
These individuals will receive conventional therapy along with Focal Muscle Vibration applied to the hyper toned muscles (Bicep Brachialis and Extensor Carpi Radialis). Evaluation at baseline and after the end session (Total 24 session). i.e. 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
Focal Muscle Vibration (60Hz)
These individuals will receive conventional therapy along with Focal Muscle Vibration applied to the hyper toned muscles (Bicep Brachialis and Extensor Carpi Radialis). Evaluation at baseline and after the end session (Total 24 session). i.e. 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* History of stroke should be \> 6 weeks and \<12 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
* Diabetic ulcer, infection or amputation of limb
* Serious cardiovascular disease or unstable angina
* Serious orthopedic problem
* Chronic medical problems
35 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Imran Amjad, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Railway General Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Annino G, Alashram AR, Alghwiri AA, Romagnoli C, Messina G, Tancredi V, Padua E, Mercuri NB. Effect of segmental muscle vibration on upper extremity functional ability poststroke: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14444. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014444.
Paoloni M, Mangone M, Scettri P, Procaccianti R, Cometa A, Santilli V. Segmental muscle vibration improves walking in chronic stroke patients with foot drop: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(3):254-62. doi: 10.1177/1545968309349940. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
Smith L, Brouwer B. Effectiveness of muscle vibration in modulating corticospinal excitability. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;42(6):787-94. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0041.
Paoloni M, Tavernese E, Fini M, Sale P, Franceschini M, Santilli V, Mangone M. Segmental muscle vibration modifies muscle activation during reaching in chronic stroke: A pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(3):405-14. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141131.
Toscano M, Celletti C, Vigano A, Altarocca A, Giuliani G, Jannini TB, Mastria G, Ruggiero M, Maestrini I, Vicenzini E, Altieri M, Camerota F, Di Piero V. Short-Term Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration on Motor Recovery After Acute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Study. Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 19;10:115. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00115. eCollection 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/00654 Irum Farooq
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.