Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-25
2026-05-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at IIMCT Railway General Hospital and Al-firdous physiotherapy clinic over a duration of six months. The sample size will consist of 50 participants. Participants which meet the inclusion criteria will be taken through non-probability convenience sampling technique, which will further be randomized through online randomization tool. 25 Participants will be assigned to Group A receiving tVNS and mCIMT with routine physical therapy and 25 to Group B receiving mCIMT with routine physical therapy . Data will be collected using various assessment tools, including Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE (FM-UE), and Nine-hole peg test (NHPT) to assess Motor function. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) to assess QOL, Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) to assess cognition, and Modified Ashworth scale to assess spasticity. All participants will receive intervention 3 days a week on alternative days for 8 weeks. Pre-intervention assessments will be conducted for both groups. The effects of the interventions will be measured at pre-treatment, 4th week, and post-intervention. Data analysis will be performed by using SPSS 26 software.
Key words: Modified Constraint Induced movement Therapy, Motor function, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Transcutaneous Vagus nerve stimulation, Upper extremity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Lower Limb Motor Function
NCT05191524
Combined Effect of CIMT and Brunnstrom Therapy on UE in Stroke Patients
NCT06762249
Comperative Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular and Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT07253870
Focal Muscle Vibration and tDCS on Motor Recovery in Stroke
NCT06893653
Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke Individuals
NCT06134921
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The severity of the neurological deficits and early patterns of improvement are the two best predictors of recovery from impairments. Patients are generally thought to experience less UL motor recovery than LL motor recovery; however, this clinical belief is typically based on disability assessments rather than tests of specific motor deficits of UL and LL. Since UL function needs finer motor control than LL function, this might explain the common scenario of less variation between impairment and disability. There are several promising treatment options available for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation, such as cross education, constraint-induced movement therapy, virtual reality therapy, functional electrical stimulation, robotic therapy, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and motor imagery.
Unfortunately, VNS necessitates a costly, invasive surgical procedure. In the last years, transcutaneous VNS (ta-VNS) has been proposed as a noninvasive and patient friendly method to stimulate the vagus nerve, through the skin, by delivering weak electric current to the sensory afferent fibers of the auricular, thick-myelinated, branch of the vagus nerve in the outer ear. Such stimulation activates the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and, via this pathway, the nuclei of the nerve located in the brainstem, enhancing brain GABA and Noradrenaline levels, which plays a pivotal role in brain plasticity. These connections regulate the release of neuromodulators, including acetylcholine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and brain-derived neurotrophic factors, which promote cortical plasticity.
The rationale for this study lies in its potential to uncover synergistic benefits from combining these two therapies, ultimately aiming to enhance functional recovery and cognitive engagement among chronic stroke survivors, thereby improving their daily lives and reintegration into society. The exploration of effective rehabilitation strategies is crucial, as traditional therapies frequently provide limited benefits for chronic stroke patients, particularly concerning upper extremity function. This research investigates the combined effects of ta-VNS and Modified CIMT on these patients, aiming to enhance motor recovery and cognitive engagement. The findings may inform future therapeutic approaches and offer hope for improved independence and well-being among individuals affected by chronic stroke.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy with Routine Physical Therapy
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Each treatment session will last one hour, conducted three times per week on alternate days for eight weeks. The session will begin with 30 minutes of routine physical therapy, which will include active and active-assisted range of motion exercises, strengthening and coordination activities, and functional task training for the upper extremity. The following 30 minutes will include concurrent tVNS and mCIMT. tVNS will be administered through surface electrodes placed on the auricular region (tragus or cymba conchae) of the ear, with stimulation parameters set at a frequency of 25 Hz, pulse width of 250 μs, and intensity adjusted to a comfortable tingling level below the pain threshold. During this period, participants will perform task-oriented activities of the affected upper limb through functional tasks such as reaching, grasping, and object manipulation. Shaping techniques will be used to progressively increase task difficulty, and a soft mitt applied to the unaffected hand.
Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy with Routine Physical Therapy
Participants will also receive session lasting for one hour, with 30 minutes devoted to routine physical therapy followed by 30 minutes of mCIMT. The routine physical therapy component will include range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and functional movement training similar to Group A to ensure treatment uniformity. The 30-minute mCIMT intervention will consist of intensive, task-specific practice of the affected upper limb under therapist supervision, focusing on goal-oriented functional tasks and repetitive training to enhance motor performance. A shaping approach will be used to progressively increase task complexity based on individual capability, and a soft constraint applied to the unaffected limb during the session.
Group B
Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy with Routine Physical Therapy
Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy with Routine Physical Therapy
Participants will also receive session lasting for one hour, with 30 minutes devoted to routine physical therapy followed by 30 minutes of mCIMT. The routine physical therapy component will include range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and functional movement training similar to Group A to ensure treatment uniformity. The 30-minute mCIMT intervention will consist of intensive, task-specific practice of the affected upper limb under therapist supervision, focusing on goal-oriented functional tasks and repetitive training to enhance motor performance. A shaping approach will be used to progressively increase task complexity based on individual capability, and a soft constraint applied to the unaffected limb during the session.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Each treatment session will last one hour, conducted three times per week on alternate days for eight weeks. The session will begin with 30 minutes of routine physical therapy, which will include active and active-assisted range of motion exercises, strengthening and coordination activities, and functional task training for the upper extremity. The following 30 minutes will include concurrent tVNS and mCIMT. tVNS will be administered through surface electrodes placed on the auricular region (tragus or cymba conchae) of the ear, with stimulation parameters set at a frequency of 25 Hz, pulse width of 250 μs, and intensity adjusted to a comfortable tingling level below the pain threshold. During this period, participants will perform task-oriented activities of the affected upper limb through functional tasks such as reaching, grasping, and object manipulation. Shaping techniques will be used to progressively increase task difficulty, and a soft mitt applied to the unaffected hand.
Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy with Routine Physical Therapy
Participants will also receive session lasting for one hour, with 30 minutes devoted to routine physical therapy followed by 30 minutes of mCIMT. The routine physical therapy component will include range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and functional movement training similar to Group A to ensure treatment uniformity. The 30-minute mCIMT intervention will consist of intensive, task-specific practice of the affected upper limb under therapist supervision, focusing on goal-oriented functional tasks and repetitive training to enhance motor performance. A shaping approach will be used to progressively increase task complexity based on individual capability, and a soft constraint applied to the unaffected limb during the session.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Left sided ischemic stroke patients.
* Patients with chronic, moderate-severe upper limb hemiparesis (\>6 months-2 years)
* Stable participants having a stroke severity score \> 6 on National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
* Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥26.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants who have a history of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, other than stroke, that could interfere with upper limb motor or sensory recovery.
* Modified Ashworth scale score ≥ 3 of the affected upper extremity.
* Patients who are not able to sit with or without support.
* Patients with severe apraxia, somatosensory problems.
* Resting heart rate (\< 50 beats/min).
* Participants who are currently participating in another clinical trial or research study.
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aruba Saeed, Phd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al- firdous physiotherapy clinic
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
IIMCT- Railway General Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00481-7.
Hays SA. Enhancing Rehabilitative Therapies with Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Apr;13(2):382-94. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z.
Redgrave J, Day D, Leung H, Laud PJ, Ali A, Lindert R, Majid A. Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1225-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Dawson J, Pierce D, Dixit A, Kimberley TJ, Robertson M, Tarver B, Hilmi O, McLean J, Forbes K, Kilgard MP, Rennaker RL, Cramer SC, Walters M, Engineer N. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):143-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Hulsey DR, Ruiz A, Pantoja M, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training improves forelimb strength following ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Dec;60:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/0270 Zara Mansha
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.