Models of Primary Osteoporosis Screening in Male Veterans

NCT ID: NCT04079868

Last Updated: 2025-10-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3512 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-30

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Models of Osteoporosis Screening in Male Veterans aims to test 1 distinct care model of primary osteoporosis screening in men within the VA healthcare setting. All care models deliver VA recommended osteoporosis screening and treatment to high-risk Veterans by appropriate Durham VA clinical staff. The MOPS project will evaluate patient, provider and facility outcomes to determine the effectiveness of each intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background/Purpose:

Osteoporosis is under-recognized in older men. At age 50 years, 1 in 5 men can expect to suffer a major osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime, comparable to the risk of prostate cancer. Men are more than twice as likely as women to experience complications after a fracture, and have greater excess mortality after hip fracture. Because risk factors are common in Veterans, osteoporosis is particularly prevalent in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) system. More than half of male Veterans over age 50 years have osteopenia or osteoporosis, a rate nearly double the non-Veteran population.

Fractures resulting from osteoporosis have negative consequences on functional status, mortality, and quality of life, with high rates of pain, depression, and loss of independence. After a hip fracture, nearly 75% of patients spend time in a nursing facility, and only 20% regain their prior level of ambulation. Many fractures are associated with substantial excess mortality; men with a hip fracture have excess annual mortality of 20% that persists up to 10 years. Osteoporotic fractures also have an important economic impact. It is estimated that hip fractures result in 43 million dollars of excess cost to the VHA annually.

Osteoporosis screening and treatment services within VA are ineffective overall. Overall, screening rates were 8% for men over age 65; far lower than expected based on the prevalence of osteoporosis risk factors in the population. Moreover, even among men in whom screening was completed, it was not associated with lower overall fracture rates because osteoporosis treatment and adherence following screening were extremely low.

Attempts to improve osteoporosis screening using traditional quality improvement programs have been minimally effective. Electronic health record (EHR) alerts alone do not improve osteoporosis screening rates and do nothing to address adherence. However, one distinct osteoporosis screening paradigm has been suggested, and form the scientific premise for the models proposed in this application. A fracture Liaison Service (referred to here as "Bone Health Service", BHS) represents a centralized model that has been successful in improving secondary osteoporosis screening and treatment adherence after a fracture has already occurred. In this model, a team of nurses led by a bone specialist identify patients with fracture within the entire health system, and arrange for evaluation and treatment. Such models have reduced 2-year fracture rates by 56% and are cost saving or highly cost-effective.

Objectives:

The investigators propose a pragmatic group randomized trial of PACT teams from both Durham and Richmond VAMC's. A PACT's will be randomized into 2 groups: a control group (no additional support), and a centralized Bone Health Service (BHS) model where teams will manage the screening and treatment of high-risk for fracture male Veterans.

Outcomes for all patients eligible for osteoporosis screening within the randomized PACTs will be assessed by investigators masked to group assignment. Outcomes for PACT providers will be assessed using qualitative methods (nominal group technique).

Patient-level outcomes:

* Eligible proportion screened
* Medication adherence
* PACT fracture rates
* Harms
* Bone mineral density

Provider and facility level outcomes:

* Change in Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) volume
* Bone mineral density (sub-sample of patients)
* Change in metabolic bone disease clinic volume
* PACT provider time and satisfaction (qualitative analyses)

Health system and policy level outcomes

* Program cost effectiveness

Methodology:

The investigators will compare the 1 screening models by enrolling, screening and randomizing PACT teams. 39 teams will be randomized, an estimated 24 teams at the Durham VA health care system and 15 at the Richmond VA medical center. Teams will be randomized to 1 of 2 arms: Bone Health Service or usual care (no additional support). A sub-set of providers will be recruited to complete a nominal group qualitative interview during year 3. Also a random sub-set of patients (900) will be recruited to complete a DXA scan to measure bone density beginning in year 4. Outcomes will be assessed at year 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis Osteopenia Osteoporotic Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Stratified, block randomization will be used. A statistician unaware of team identity will randomize PACTs in blocks of 2 within strata to ensure similar distributions. If insufficient numbers of PACTs are recruited within small CBOCs, they will be combined with other similar CBOCs (rural vs. urban) for randomization.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Outcome assessors will be masked to the group assignment

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bone Health Service arm

Interventional arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bone Health Service Model

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in PACTs randomized to the BHS model will have osteoporosis screening, education, and follow-up handled centrally by the bone health team.

Usual care (control) arm

This arm represents a "no practice management support" control group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bone Health Service Model

Patients in PACTs randomized to the BHS model will have osteoporosis screening, education, and follow-up handled centrally by the bone health team.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provider with at least 0.75 FTE
* Provider has completed training (i.e., PACT teams led by residents and fellows are excluded)
* Care for male Veterans \>65 years (i.e., Women's Health PACTs are excluded)


* No prior fracture or osteoporosis diagnosis
* At least 1 VA Undersecretary Guideline risk factor (weight loss \>20% in 5 years; BMI \<25 kg/m2; diabetes; pernicious anemia; gastrectomy; anticonvulsants; glucocorticoids; androgen deprivation therapy; hyperthyroidism; hyperparathyroidism; rheumatoid arthritis; alcohol dependence; chronic lung disease; chronic liver disease; stroke; Parkinsonism; prostate cancer; and current smoking).


* Men aged 65-85 years
* Enrolled in eligible PACT team for at least 2 years
* Meet 1 or more criteria for osteoporosis screening as the protocol at PACT enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cathleen S Colon-Emeric, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Colon-Emeric C, Lee R, Lyles KW, Zullig LL, Sloane R, Pieper CF, Nelson RE, Adler RA. Remote Bone Health Service for Osteoporosis Screening in High-Risk Men: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 25:e254150. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4150. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40853653 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 17-202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.