OsteoPorotic FracTure PreventION System (OPTIONS) Research Study
NCT ID: NCT06731608
Last Updated: 2024-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1553 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2028-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Many older adults have surgery in a hospital after breaking a hip or leg. Then older adults go to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. Care in SNFs varies greatly. Some patients do not receive the regimen that the investigators know is most beneficial to improve bone health and recovery. Even patients who get exercise, healthy diet, and bone-strengthening medication in the SNF, may not continue with the regimen once patients go home. Therefore, the investigators want to implement and test OsteoPorotic fracTure preventION System (OPTIONS). OPTIONS is a program that will integrate the regimen into the care that is provided in SNFs and after discharge to the community. OPTONS will provide information about exercise, diet, and bone-strengthening medication. OPTIONS will provide doctors, clinical staff, patients, and care partners with the information these stakeholders need to carry out the best-practice regimen.
The investigators are partnering with PointClickCare, a large cloud-based healthcare software provider, with SNFs and community care sites across the US. The investigators will include 32 SNFs from different US areas. The investigators will flip a coin to assign SNFs to the intervention (OPTIONS) or the control arm (enhanced usual care) of the study. Enhanced usual care is the care that is typically provided in SNFs after a fracture and adding information about a publicly available fall prevention toolkit. The investigators are using an "implementation science" approach that requires the investigators to get input from the OPTIONS study's vast stakeholder community throughout the study. The OPTIONS study's stakeholders include patients, care partners, clinicians, and professional organizations.
The research question is, can using OPTIONS in SNFs and in the community after discharge improve physical function and quality of life in older people in the year after a hip or leg fracture? The investigators are measuring patient-reported outcomes. The investigators will include 1553 patients across the 32 facilities. The investigators have selected outcomes that are important to patients. Specifically, the investigators are measuring patient-reported function and quality of life. The investigators are also measuring patient-reported falls and fractures. The investigators will track the number of patients who die during the study. This study's hypothesis is that patients who receive OPTIONS will report better physical function (i.e., can walk and take better care of themselves) than those who receive enhanced usual care. The investigators also hypothesize that patients that receive OPTIONS will report a better quality of life than those who receive enhanced usual care.
This study will provide sound data about the effectiveness of OPTIONS. OPTIONS could then be spread to other SNFs and community-based programs. This would ensure that all older people receive the right care after a hip or leg fracture.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will partner with PointClickCare, a large cloud-based healthcare software provider and with SNFs across the United States to conduct a matched pair cluster randomized controlled trial (SNF as unit of randomization) across 32 SNFs. The purpose of this project is to determine the effectiveness of OPTIONS to improve function and quality of life by increasing uptake and adherence of 3 evidence-based clinical interventions: functional exercises, nutrition, and bone-enhancing medications. The investigators will compare outcomes from 776 older patients with access to OPTIONS in 16 SNFs versus enhanced usual care (n=776 patients in 16 SNFs) in the year after lower limb fracture across transitions of care from SNF to community-based care. The OPTIONS intervention and implementation will be informed by the OPTIONS study's stakeholder community which consists of patients, caregivers, professional and para-professional providers, and professional organizations.
It is critical to use both effectiveness and implementation science aims to maximize rigor in testing OPTIONS' effectiveness and in developing and testing the implementation protocol to produce a widely reproducible product. To ensure successful implementation in a large number of complex care environments (SNF/Community), the investigators will first use the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) implementation science framework to develop an OPTIONS implementation toolkit during a pilot implementation phase using semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (SNF staff, patients, and care partners). Based on this qualitative feedback, the investigators will refine the implementation protocol and toolkit for conducting the cluster randomized trial. The investigators will also use RE-AIM to refine the OPTIONS implementation toolkit at the end of the trial with additional qualitative interviews to facilitate widespread dissemination of the OPTIONS intervention.
The study's specific aims are:
Outcome Aim: Evaluate the effectiveness of OPTIONS versus enhanced usual care for improving function and quality of life (primary outcomes) by increasing uptake and adherence of 3 evidence-based clinical interventions: functional exercise, nutrition, and bone-enhancing medications, across SNF and community care transitions in the first year after lower limb fracture. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include self-reported falls and fractures, mortality (secondary outcomes); measures of adherence to the trimodal interventions in the year after lower limb fracture, and primary care follow-up rates after discharge from SNF (tertiary outcomes).
Implementation Aim: Evaluate the effectiveness of the OPTIONS implementation process and adherence during SNF and community care transitions, during the pilot phase and at trial completion, using content analysis of qualitative data from key stakeholders. The investigators will produce an implementation toolkit to facilitate spread beyond project sites that will include tools to address the following: 1) Process evaluation including implementation progress and identification of processes that worked well or need adjustment. 2) Readiness for Implementation checklist. 3) Classification of adoption success using a rating system that will allow future sites to redress ongoing issues after the initial implementation period.
This study will provide reliable evidence about the effectiveness of OPTIONS that could be widely disseminated to other SNFs providing rehabilitative care and community-based programs to ensure that tailored prevention recommendations and prescriptions are evidence-based and consistent with patients' needs and preferences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OPTIONS intervention
OPTIONS is a multimodal intervention approach that includes providing clinical decision support (CDS) for healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers focused on exercise, nutrition, and bone-enhancing medications using CDS in SNFs that use the same electronic health record system (PointClickCare).
OPTIONS
OPTIONS is a multimodal intervention approach that includes providing clinical decision support (CDS) for healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers focused on exercise, nutrition, and bone-enhancing medications using CDS in SNFs that use the same electronic health record system (PointClickCare).
Enhanced Usual Care
Enhanced usual care includes access to the STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit, a fall prevention program from the CDC.
Enhanced usual care
Enhanced usual care includes access to the STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit, a fall prevention program from the CDC.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OPTIONS
OPTIONS is a multimodal intervention approach that includes providing clinical decision support (CDS) for healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers focused on exercise, nutrition, and bone-enhancing medications using CDS in SNFs that use the same electronic health record system (PointClickCare).
Enhanced usual care
Enhanced usual care includes access to the STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit, a fall prevention program from the CDC.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admitted to a participating SNF
* Expected to be discharged back to the community
Exclusion Criteria
* Do not have access to a working phone
* In hospice care or terminal condition (not expected to live at least 4 months)
* Severe cognitive impairment (Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale (MDS-COGS) score \> 5: 0, 1 represents cognitively intact-mild impairment, 2, 3, 4 represents mild-moderate impairment, 5, 6, 7, 8 represents moderate-severe impairment)
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Hebrew SeniorLife
OTHER
University of Florida
OTHER
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Patricia C. Dykes
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise Orwig, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Patricia Dykes, RN, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Maryland, Baltimore, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Gerontology
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Denise Orwig, PhD
Role: primary
Patricia Dykes, RN, PhD
Role: primary
Kumiko Schnock, RN,PhD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OFP-2021C3-24922
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2024P002736
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id