Safety and Performance Study of the Optimum Transcatheter Aortic Valve
NCT ID: NCT04076150
Last Updated: 2022-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-18
2027-05-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy Continued Access Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in Very High Risk Subjects and High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01531374
Mortality Post-TAVI and Correlation With Haemodynamic Parameters.
NCT03769545
Safety & Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System-Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Significant Comorbidities in Extreme Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01675440
Multi Modal Cardiac Imaging Prior Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT01805739
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Management of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
NCT03633383
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients Receiving Optimum TAV
Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis that will be treated via transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedure
Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) Implantation With The Optimum TAV System
Treating patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis via transcatheter aortic valve implantation by implanting the Optimum TAV inside the native diseased valve via a the Precision Catheter. The Optimum TAV and Precision Catheter together are the Optimum TAV System.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAV) Implantation With The Optimum TAV System
Treating patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis via transcatheter aortic valve implantation by implanting the Optimum TAV inside the native diseased valve via a the Precision Catheter. The Optimum TAV and Precision Catheter together are the Optimum TAV System.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. 70 years of age or older;
3. Echocardiographic or hemodynamic based evidence of calcific (senile) aortic stenosis with one of the following: aortic valve Effective Orifice Area (EAO) ≤ 1.0 cm2 or 0.6 cm2/m2, mean aortic valve gradient ≥35 mmHg or peak aortic valve velocity \> 4 m/sec.
4. Symptomatology due to native aortic stenosis resulting in a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of II or greater.
5. Aortic valve annular diameter ≥ 21 and ≤ 23mm measured by MSCT (Multi-Slice Computed Tomography).
6. A STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) score ≥ 8; or Logistic EuroScore I ≥ 15; or a determination by the local heart team that the co-morbidities not captured by the STS or EuroScore are expected to increase the operative mortality risk to \> 15%.
7. Geographically available and willing to comply with follow up.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Noncalcified aortic valve;
3. Valve eccentricity (calcific or otherwise) that in the opinion of the investigator could compromise procedural success;
4. Severe (Grade 3 to 4) aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve regurgitation;
5. Moderate to severe mitral stenosis;
6. Myocardial infarction within the past 30 days\*
7. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation;
8. LVEF (Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction) \< 30%;
9. Severe pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary systolic pressure greater than two-thirds of systemic pressure;
10. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic drug therapy within the past 14 days or mechanical support within the past 6 months; \*
11. Presence of significant aortic disease such as atheroma, thrombus, or aneurysm which, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes safe implant delivery;
12. Blood dyscrasias defined as: acute leukopenia, acute anemia, acute thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy;
13. Patient ineligible for or refuses blood transfusions;
14. Unfavorable peripheral vascular anatomy or disease (e.g. severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or small vessels) that would preclude passage of catheters from the femoral arterial access to the aorta as evidenced by peripheral MSCT;
15. Gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 30 days; \*
16. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within past 3 months;\*
17. Renal insufficiency as demonstrated by a serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL;
18. End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis;
19. Active infection requiring ongoing treatment;
20. Need for emergent surgery or intervention other than the investigational procedure;
21. Hypersensitivity or contraindication to procedural medication(s) and device material(s) (e.g. titanium, nickel, pork) which cannot be adequately pre-medicated;
22. Life expectancy \< 1 year due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions;
23. Currently participating in any other investigational drug or device study;
24. Patient lacking capacity to provide informed consent (history of any cognitive or mental health status that would interfere with study participation)
25. Subject found to have an International Normalized Ratio (INR) greater than 2.0 right before the procedure.
* At the time of procedure, if a subject's medical status has changed since enrollment, the subject shall be re-evaluated for eligibility.
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KCRI
OTHER
Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
John Paul II Hospital, Dept. of Interventional Cardiology
Krakow, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jaroslaw Trebacz, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
THUB-CLIN-2018-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.