Alternative Access Approaches for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replace (TAVR) in Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT01787084
Last Updated: 2025-04-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
8 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-30
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EARLY TAVR: Evaluation of TAVR Compared to Surveillance for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
NCT03042104
TRANscatheter or SurgIcal Aortic Valve ReplacemenT in All-Comers With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis
NCT02838199
ACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT03735667
TAVR Without Predilatation
NCT04350658
A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
NCT07108478
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Early approaches to TAVR included a femoral transvenous approach with transseptal access to the left side for delivery of the valve. This approach avoided large bore arterial catheterization, but it had unacceptable rates of complications and lacked reproducibility. Alternative access approaches have been developed because of the risks associated with inserting large caliber catheters into small, diseased femoral arteries often associated with diffuse vasculopathy. To avoid the vascular complications from femoral access, other transcatheter approaches have been developed to include open surgical access to the left ventricular apex (TA), ascending aorta, (TAO), subclavian and axillary arteries (TS), and retroperitoneal access to the iliac artery (TI) as well as distal aorta. In addition to providing TAVR to patients who cannot have TF access, additional advantages include better catheter control and safer closure of the access site. Commonly cited disadvantages include the need for surgical expertise and additional equipment, along with the potential for longer recovery, more incisional pain, greater radiation exposure for operators, unsuitable delivery catheters for alternative access sites, and a host of unique alternative access site complications.
We propose to collectively analyze 30-day safety endpoints as a lumped data group for these alternative access approaches. These data are gathered from clinical practice in real-world settings and submitted to the TVT Registry. It is expected that centers will choose among the various choices for alternative access based the causative factors underlying the need for alternative access, as well as local skill sets and experience. For this lumped data group of alternative access approaches we will compare 30-day safety results to the TA outcomes reported from Cohort A of the PARTNERS 1 trial. We recognize that these TA patients were high risk operable patients rather than inoperable patients, but no other direct comparator group is available. We reason that the TA data from this published clinical trial are high quality, represent an alternative access approach rather than TF, and will provide a frequency of safety endpoints that have been found to be acceptable both clinically and from a regulatory perspective.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inoperable Patients Alternative Access
Non-femoral delivery (or alternative access) in patients iwht severe symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis who have been determined by a cardiac surgeon to be inoperable for open aortic valve replacement and in whom existing co-morbidities would not preclude the expected benefit from correction of the aortic stenosis
Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve
Non-femoral transcatheter delivery of heart valve
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve
Non-femoral transcatheter delivery of heart valve
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary indication is symptomatic primary severe aortic stenosis predicted to benefit from relief of valvular stenosis
* Aortic valve area less than 0.8 centimeters squared
* Mean aortic valve gradient greater than or equal to 40 mmHG
* Peak aortic jet velocity greater than or equal to 4.0 m per second
* Valve sheath access site is femoral, axillary, transapical, transaortic, subclavian or subaxillary
* Patient is judged by the local heart team to be inoperable for Aortic Valve Replacement due to severe chest wall deformities or radiation effects, severe peripheral or aortic vascular disease, or severe systemic disease prohibiting the safe conduct of Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB)
Exclusion Criteria
* Active infectious endocarditis
* Valve in prosthetic valve procedure
* Patients considered by the heart team to be unlikely to receive meaningful or durable clinical benefit from the procedure
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American College of Cardiology
OTHER
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John D Carroll, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
American College of Cardiology
Fred H Edwards, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TVTR-2012-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.