Gastrostomy-Biliary Diversion: Innovative Management for Bile Canalicular Transport Disorders
NCT ID: NCT04071197
Last Updated: 2020-08-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-10
2021-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Placement of Biliary Drainage Stent to Prevent Biliary Intestinal Anastomosis After Liver Transplantation in Children
NCT06048445
NAtural Course and Prognosis of PFIC and Effect of Biliary Diversion
NCT03930810
Microbial Analysis in Patients With Cholangitis
NCT04216745
Cholangitis Definition and Treatment After Kasai Hepatoportoenterostomy for Biliary Atresia: TRACK-BA Study (TRacking Cholangitis Post Kasai in Biliary Atresia)
NCT07129655
Gallbladder Stones in Children and Correlation With Etiological Factors
NCT06660576
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
More recently both disease categories that represent the severest (PFIC) and mildest (BRIC) forms of these transporters are better nomenclated as bile canalicular transport disorders, as some cases can start early as BRIC and later in life progress the PFIC phenotype. Moreover, a continuous spectrum of severity is present between what were previously known as PFIC and BRIC.
If the severest forms are not treated effectively they can have devastating outcomes reaching death. On the other hand, those known as BRIC can have severe attacks with unremitting pruritus that could be prolonged and sometimes persistent.
Their treatment poses a great challenge, with medical treatment is not successful in many cases. Moreover, the available non-transplant surgeries carry many side effects and different degrees of efficacy. Partial external biliary diversion is not always successful and has disfiguring effects and the stoma can have many side effects. Internal biliary diversion and ileal exclusion still lack widespread experience and encouraging results due to sometimes lack of efficacy and others due to side effects. Nasobiliary stent placement was tried in previous cases with a promising outcome, but with little tolerability, especially in younger age.
In spite liver transplant is the last resort for failing cases, the availability of successful non transplant therapy would be the preferable one if it is with adequate efficacy and little side effects. The innovative intervention proposed in this study is expected to have a good efficacy due to total biliary diversion rather than the partial ones obtained by other surgeries. Moreover, it avoids the disfiguring impact of the jeujenal stoma. More importantly, it can be removed at any time and be used at the times of severe flare of the disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gastrostomy-biliary tube
The study group will be subjected to gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril
Gastostomy-biliary tube
gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril
Other biliary diversion modalities
The control group will include those cases with other modalities of therapy as external biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion, and nasobiliary tube
External biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion and nasobiliary tube
All biliary diversion modalities other than gastrobiliary tube
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gastostomy-biliary tube
gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril
External biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion and nasobiliary tube
All biliary diversion modalities other than gastrobiliary tube
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PFIC cases that are not responding to medical treatment and refusing non-transplant surgery and not indicated for liver transplant
* BRIC cases with frequent attacks not responding to medical therapy and refusing or unable to tolerate nasobiliary stent
Exclusion Criteria
* Decompensated cirrhosis
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Liver Institute, Egypt
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmad M Sira, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pediatric Hepatology Dep; National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University
Shibīn al Kawm, Menofiya, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van der Woerd WL, van Mil SW, Stapelbroek JM, Klomp LW, van de Graaf SF, Houwen RH. Familial cholestasis: progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;24(5):541-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.07.010.
Kaur S, Sharma D, Wadhwa N, Gupta S, Chowdhary SK, Sibal A. Therapeutic interventions in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: experience from a tertiary care centre in north India. Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;79(2):270-3. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0516-8. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
Mochizuki K, Obatake M, Takatsuki M, Nakatomi A, Hayashi T, Okudaira S, Eguchi S. Partial internal biliary diversion for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Jan;28(1):51-4. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-3018-x.
Stapelbroek JM, van Erpecum KJ, Klomp LW, Venneman NG, Schwartz TP, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Devlin J, van Nieuwkerk CM, Knisely AS, Houwen RH. Nasobiliary drainage induces long-lasting remission in benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis. Hepatology. 2006 Jan;43(1):51-3. doi: 10.1002/hep.20998.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GBD-PED-BCTD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.