Gastrostomy-Biliary Diversion: Innovative Management for Bile Canalicular Transport Disorders

NCT ID: NCT04071197

Last Updated: 2020-08-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-10

Study Completion Date

2021-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of disorders that can present early in life with cholestasis and intractable pruritus. Their treatment poses a great challenge, with medical treatment is not successful in many cases. Moreover, the available non-transplant surgeries carry many side effects and different degrees of efficacy. Partial external biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion, and ileal exclusion still lack widespread experience with many side effects. Nasobiliary stent placement has little tolerability, especially in younger age. Gastrobiliary tube is a novel modality for external biliary diversion in such patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a group of disorders that can present early in life with cholestasis and intractable pruritus. They result primarily from defective transporters of different bile constituents on the canalicular membrane. The mildest form of these defective transporters can present by what is called benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC).

More recently both disease categories that represent the severest (PFIC) and mildest (BRIC) forms of these transporters are better nomenclated as bile canalicular transport disorders, as some cases can start early as BRIC and later in life progress the PFIC phenotype. Moreover, a continuous spectrum of severity is present between what were previously known as PFIC and BRIC.

If the severest forms are not treated effectively they can have devastating outcomes reaching death. On the other hand, those known as BRIC can have severe attacks with unremitting pruritus that could be prolonged and sometimes persistent.

Their treatment poses a great challenge, with medical treatment is not successful in many cases. Moreover, the available non-transplant surgeries carry many side effects and different degrees of efficacy. Partial external biliary diversion is not always successful and has disfiguring effects and the stoma can have many side effects. Internal biliary diversion and ileal exclusion still lack widespread experience and encouraging results due to sometimes lack of efficacy and others due to side effects. Nasobiliary stent placement was tried in previous cases with a promising outcome, but with little tolerability, especially in younger age.

In spite liver transplant is the last resort for failing cases, the availability of successful non transplant therapy would be the preferable one if it is with adequate efficacy and little side effects. The innovative intervention proposed in this study is expected to have a good efficacy due to total biliary diversion rather than the partial ones obtained by other surgeries. Moreover, it avoids the disfiguring impact of the jeujenal stoma. More importantly, it can be removed at any time and be used at the times of severe flare of the disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study group will be subjected to gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gastrostomy-biliary tube

The study group will be subjected to gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gastostomy-biliary tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril

Other biliary diversion modalities

The control group will include those cases with other modalities of therapy as external biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion, and nasobiliary tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

External biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion and nasobiliary tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

All biliary diversion modalities other than gastrobiliary tube

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gastostomy-biliary tube

gastrostomy followed by ERCP with nasobiliary stent placement in the CBD with its distal end been exit from the previously performed gastrostomy instead of the nostril

Intervention Type DEVICE

External biliary diversion, internal biliary diversion and nasobiliary tube

All biliary diversion modalities other than gastrobiliary tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PFIC cases that are previously responding to medical treatment with recent flare of the disease that doesn't respond to medical therapy
* PFIC cases that are not responding to medical treatment and refusing non-transplant surgery and not indicated for liver transplant
* BRIC cases with frequent attacks not responding to medical therapy and refusing or unable to tolerate nasobiliary stent

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe portal hypertensive gastropathy
* Decompensated cirrhosis
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Liver Institute, Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmad M Sira, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pediatric Hepatology Dep; National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University

Shibīn al Kawm, Menofiya, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmad M Sira, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmad M Sira, M.D.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van der Woerd WL, van Mil SW, Stapelbroek JM, Klomp LW, van de Graaf SF, Houwen RH. Familial cholestasis: progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;24(5):541-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.07.010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20955958 (View on PubMed)

Kaur S, Sharma D, Wadhwa N, Gupta S, Chowdhary SK, Sibal A. Therapeutic interventions in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: experience from a tertiary care centre in north India. Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;79(2):270-3. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0516-8. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21769524 (View on PubMed)

Mochizuki K, Obatake M, Takatsuki M, Nakatomi A, Hayashi T, Okudaira S, Eguchi S. Partial internal biliary diversion for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Jan;28(1):51-4. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-3018-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22033772 (View on PubMed)

Stapelbroek JM, van Erpecum KJ, Klomp LW, Venneman NG, Schwartz TP, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Devlin J, van Nieuwkerk CM, Knisely AS, Houwen RH. Nasobiliary drainage induces long-lasting remission in benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis. Hepatology. 2006 Jan;43(1):51-3. doi: 10.1002/hep.20998.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16374853 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GBD-PED-BCTD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.