Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
NCT ID: NCT04054128
Last Updated: 2020-04-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-11
2020-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Heparin Versus Saline in Peripheral Venous Catheter
NCT02970409
Neutrolin Versus Heparin for Locking Hemodialysis Catheters
NCT03425448
Efficacy Study to Evaluate B-Lock™ as an Antimicrobial Lock Solution in Dialysis Patients With a CVC
NCT01989091
Comparison of a TauroLock™ Based Regimen to 4% Citrate as Lock Solution in Tunneled Haemodialysis Catheters for the Prevention of Bacteraemia and Dysfunction
NCT02789501
Long-term Hemodialysis Catheter Removal and Delayed Replacement, Versus Exchange Over a Guidewire to Treat Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection
NCT03054714
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study period will be between august 16, 2019 to November 16, 2019. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of catheter lock with bicarbonate vs heparin in chronic hemodialysis patients. Primary outcome will be catheter function. Secondary outcomes will be Infectious complications, thrombotic complications, and frequency of adverse effects between groups.
All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. The trial protocol was approved by Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" Internal Review Board, register number 17-CI-16053153, and Research \& Ethics committee, with register number 16-CEI-004-20161212, Study registry # 479/01/9.
Patients between 18-65 years old, incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis, with 1 month of clinical stability and with temporal catheter as vascular access for hemodialysis are eligible. A total of 60 patients will be included in the study. All patients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: SBCL (n=30), intervention group and HCL (n=30), as control group.
Before each hemodialysis treatment, catheters and connections will be inspected for leaks, evidence of damage, exit-site infection and tunnel infection. Intraluminal SBCL or HCL solution will be removed before connecting the hemodialysis catheter to a dialysis machine prior to any treatment.
During each treatment, patients will be prescribed and monitored for complications and standard treatment will be provided to every patient. After each treatment, blood will be rinsed from dialysis lines with 0.9% saline solution back to the patient. Upon the conclusion of treatment, all catheters will be flushed with 10 mL 0.9% saline solution per blood line respectively, after saline flush, catheter lock will be prescribed; SBCL group with 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution, at a dose of 2 milliliters per lumen, and HCL group with sodium heparin at a concentration of 1000 units per milliliter, at a dose of 2 milliliters per lumen. Catheter exit site dressing changes occurred after each HD treatment.
Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm non tunneled catheter will be the standard vascular access. All central venous catheters will be inserted by an expert operator under strict aseptic protocol. Catheter care will be performed by trained dialysis staff. At the end of dialysis, all catheters will be flushed and locked with the respectively arm solution.
Function assessment will be based on both, pressure and flow measurements on arterial line, as well as measurements of arterial and venous line pressures and flow during hemodialysis sessions. Infectious and thrombotic complications will be assessed as defined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sodium bicarbonate catheter lock group (SBCL)
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with sodium bicarbonate 7.5% Injection.
Sodium Bicarbonate 7.5% Injection
Sodium bicarbonate solution for catheter lock; 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Heparin catheter lock group (HCL)
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with heparin, 1000 Units/mL injectable solution
Heparin Sodium, 1000 Units/mL Injectable Solution 1
Heparin for catheter lock: 1000 u/mL heparin solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens as standard treatment, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sodium Bicarbonate 7.5% Injection
Sodium bicarbonate solution for catheter lock; 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Heparin Sodium, 1000 Units/mL Injectable Solution 1
Heparin for catheter lock: 1000 u/mL heparin solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens as standard treatment, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients who receive at least 2 sessions per week with 1 month of clinical stability defined as: no hospitalizations, no vascular access infections, no changes in blood flow prescription due to vascular access dysfunction.
* Patients with temporal catheter (Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm length, BARD Access System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) as vascular access for hemodialysis.
Exclusion Criteria
* On anticoagulation therapy
* Patients with known coagulopathy or hemophilia
* Patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver failure
* Patients with thrombocytopenia less than 100,000 u / L
* Patients with central vessel stenosis and vena cava syndrome, previously documented.
* Patients with vascular access exhaustion.
* Patients who have undergone more than 2 vascular approaches for hemodialysis catheters.
* Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
OTHER
NAUSLIFE HEMODIALYSIS CLINICS
UNKNOWN
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
J ARMANDO VÁZQUEZ ÁVILA, MD
Nephrology fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Israel Campos, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, Saran R, Wang AY, Yang CW. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X. Epub 2013 May 31.
Ma A, Shroff R, Hothi D, Lopez MM, Veligratli F, Calder F, Rees L. A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Feb;28(2):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2318-2. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
Adib-Hajbaghery M, Molavizadeh N, Alavi NM. Quality of care of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in a hemodialysis center in Iran. J Vasc Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2011.10.002.
Agharazii M, Plamondon I, Lebel M, Douville P, Desmeules S. Estimation of heparin leak into the systemic circulation after central venous catheter heparin lock. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jun;20(6):1238-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh841. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
Moran JE, Ash SR; ASDIN Clinical Practice Committee. Locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters; heparin and citrate--a position paper by ASDIN. Semin Dial. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):490-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00466.x. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
Chen FK, Li JJ, Song Y, Zhang YY, Chen P, Zhao CZ, Gong HY, Yao DF. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk. Ren Fail. 2014 Feb;36(1):17-22. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.830207. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
Palomo I, Pereira J, Alarcon M, Diaz G, Hidalgo P, Pizarro I, Jara E, Rojas P, Quiroga G, Moore-Carrasco R. Prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(5):189-95. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20076.
Yon CK, Low CL. Sodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a lock solution in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jan 15;70(2):131-6. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120300.
Shanks RM, Sargent JL, Martinez RM, Graber ML, O'Toole GA. Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Aug;21(8):2247-55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl170. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Beigi AA, HadiZadeh MS, Salimi F, Ghaheri H. Heparin compared with normal saline to maintain patency of permanent double lumen hemodialysis catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2014 May 28;3:121. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.133192. eCollection 2014.
Zhong L, Wang HL, Xu B, Yuan Y, Wang X, Zhang YY, Ji L, Pan ZM, Hu ZS. Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Jan 8;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1585-x.
Wong DW, Mishkin FS, Tanaka TT. The effects of bicarbonate on blood coagulation. JAMA. 1980 Jul 4;244(1):61-2.
Farha MA, French S, Stokes JM, Brown ED. Bicarbonate Alters Bacterial Susceptibility to Antibiotics by Targeting the Proton Motive Force. ACS Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 9;4(3):382-390. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00194. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Nostro A, Cellini L, Di Giulio M, D'Arrigo M, Marino A, Blanco AR, Favaloro A, Cutroneo G, Bisignano G. Effect of alkaline pH on staphylococcal biofilm formation. APMIS. 2012 Sep;120(9):733-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02900.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
479/01/19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.