Citrate 4% Versus Heparinised Saline in Preventing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Occlusions

NCT ID: NCT03114722

Last Updated: 2017-06-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded study. 1 group will be assigned the standard arm with use of heparinised saline (10U/ml) lock in between each catheter use. This is consistent with the standard procedure of PICC care in the investigators' centre. The second group will be assigned the intervention with use of 4% citrate lock (Dirinco Citra-Lock 4%) in between each catheter use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PICC occlusion in patients requiring long-term central line access for chemotherapy is a recurrent issue. Occlusion is usually managed by administration of fibrinolytic agents, and subsequent removal and re-insertion if unsuccessful.

Locally, the current clinical practice is to use heparinised saline at a concentration of 10U/ml as a locking agent in between use of the PICC line to prevent occlusion. Citrate 4% has antithrombotic and antibacterial properties, which makes it potentially superior to heparin as a locking agent. Citrate chelates ionised calcium in blood, inhibiting calcium-dependent clotting pathways. Also, as a chelating agent, it results in inhibition of growth of micro-organisms. Citrate-based anticoagulation is often preferred over heparin because of its safety and rapid systemic clearance. Citrate also is safe for heparin induced thrombocytopenia patients.

The effects of each agent have been compared in renal patients with central lines on haemodialysis. These studies have demonstrated that 4% citrate is at least equivalent (MacRae, 2008) or even superior (Grudzinski, 2007) to heparin 5000U/ml in preventing catheter occlusions, and superior in preventing infection (Weijmer, 2002).

This study is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded study. 1 group will be assigned the standard arm with use of heparinised saline (10U/ml) lock in between each catheter use. This is consistent with the standard procedure of PICC care in the investigators' centre. The second group will be assigned the intervention with use of 4% citrate lock (Dirinco Citra-Lock 4%) in between each catheter use.

Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends. A standardised data tracking form will be used to assess baseline characteristics as well as number of times urokinase was used. Nursing documentation regarding each PICC flushing (standard documentation as per hospital protocol) will be evaluated for number of discrete attempts made to troubleshoot lines without use of urokinase. Positive blood culture results will be recorded for each patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Occlusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

heparin 10U/ml

Heparinised saline (10U/ml) lock in between each catheter use (with standard twice weekly normal saline flushing if catheter not being used)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Heparinised saline (10U/ml)

Intervention Type DRUG

In patients randomised to the heparinised saline arm, the PICC line will be locked with 10U/ml heparinised saline between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends

citrate 4%

4% citrate lock in between each catheter use (with standard twice weekly normal saline flushing if catheter not being used)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Citrate 4%

Intervention Type DRUG

In patients randomised to the citrate arm, the PICC line will be locked with a total of 1.6ml of citrate 4% (0.8ml per lumen in a double-lumen PICC), between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Citrate 4%

In patients randomised to the citrate arm, the PICC line will be locked with a total of 1.6ml of citrate 4% (0.8ml per lumen in a double-lumen PICC), between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends

Intervention Type DRUG

Heparinised saline (10U/ml)

In patients randomised to the heparinised saline arm, the PICC line will be locked with 10U/ml heparinised saline between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age more than or equal to 21 years.
* Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of haematological or oncological malignancy
* Signed informed consent from patient or legal representative
* Patients on antiplatelet therapy may be recruited to the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy.
* Anticoagulation - warfarin or heparin or novel oral anticoagulants
* Serious concomitant disorders that would compromise the safety of the patient or compromise the patient's ability to complete the study, at the discretion of the investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Soo Chin Lee

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National University Hospital, Singapore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nationa University Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Soo Chin Lee

Role: CONTACT

(65) 6779 5555

Joan Choo Rou-En

Role: CONTACT

(65) 6779 5555

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Soo Chin Lee, MBBS, MRCP

Role: primary

+65 6779 5555

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Macrae JM, Dojcinovic I, Djurdjev O, Jung B, Shalansky S, Levin A, Kiaii M. Citrate 4% versus heparin and the reduction of thrombosis study (CHARTS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3(2):369-74. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01760407.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18308996 (View on PubMed)

Grudzinski L, Quinan P, Kwok S, Pierratos A. Sodium citrate 4% locking solution for central venous dialysis catheters--an effective, more cost-efficient alternative to heparin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Feb;22(2):471-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl606. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17065193 (View on PubMed)

Weijmer MC, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Van De Vondervoort FJ, ter Wee PM. Superior antimicrobial activity of trisodium citrate over heparin for catheter locking. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Dec;17(12):2189-95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.12.2189.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12454232 (View on PubMed)

Strauss RG. Mechanisms of adverse effects during hemapheresis. J Clin Apher. 1996;11(3):160-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1101(1996)11:33.0.CO;2-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8915821 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016/01420

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.