Citrate 4% Versus Heparinised Saline in Preventing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Occlusions
NCT ID: NCT03114722
Last Updated: 2017-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-31
2018-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of Routine Normal Saline Flush Versus Heparinized Saline Solution in Groshong and Groshong PICC Catheters
NCT00001518
Safety and Effectiveness of Novel Nitroglycerin Based Catheter Lock Solution
NCT02577718
Maintaining Patency in Implanted Port Catheters
NCT02354118
Pediatric Ethanol Lock Therapy Study.
NCT00948441
Hydrochloric Acid Lock Therapy for Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections
NCT05376566
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Locally, the current clinical practice is to use heparinised saline at a concentration of 10U/ml as a locking agent in between use of the PICC line to prevent occlusion. Citrate 4% has antithrombotic and antibacterial properties, which makes it potentially superior to heparin as a locking agent. Citrate chelates ionised calcium in blood, inhibiting calcium-dependent clotting pathways. Also, as a chelating agent, it results in inhibition of growth of micro-organisms. Citrate-based anticoagulation is often preferred over heparin because of its safety and rapid systemic clearance. Citrate also is safe for heparin induced thrombocytopenia patients.
The effects of each agent have been compared in renal patients with central lines on haemodialysis. These studies have demonstrated that 4% citrate is at least equivalent (MacRae, 2008) or even superior (Grudzinski, 2007) to heparin 5000U/ml in preventing catheter occlusions, and superior in preventing infection (Weijmer, 2002).
This study is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded study. 1 group will be assigned the standard arm with use of heparinised saline (10U/ml) lock in between each catheter use. This is consistent with the standard procedure of PICC care in the investigators' centre. The second group will be assigned the intervention with use of 4% citrate lock (Dirinco Citra-Lock 4%) in between each catheter use.
Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends. A standardised data tracking form will be used to assess baseline characteristics as well as number of times urokinase was used. Nursing documentation regarding each PICC flushing (standard documentation as per hospital protocol) will be evaluated for number of discrete attempts made to troubleshoot lines without use of urokinase. Positive blood culture results will be recorded for each patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
heparin 10U/ml
Heparinised saline (10U/ml) lock in between each catheter use (with standard twice weekly normal saline flushing if catheter not being used)
Heparinised saline (10U/ml)
In patients randomised to the heparinised saline arm, the PICC line will be locked with 10U/ml heparinised saline between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends
citrate 4%
4% citrate lock in between each catheter use (with standard twice weekly normal saline flushing if catheter not being used)
Citrate 4%
In patients randomised to the citrate arm, the PICC line will be locked with a total of 1.6ml of citrate 4% (0.8ml per lumen in a double-lumen PICC), between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Citrate 4%
In patients randomised to the citrate arm, the PICC line will be locked with a total of 1.6ml of citrate 4% (0.8ml per lumen in a double-lumen PICC), between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends
Heparinised saline (10U/ml)
In patients randomised to the heparinised saline arm, the PICC line will be locked with 10U/ml heparinised saline between each use. Lines will also be flushed with 20ml of normal saline and locked with the locking agent twice a week, if the time elapsed between each use is more than one week. This is part of the standard local protocol. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months or until the catheter is removed, or until the study ends
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of haematological or oncological malignancy
* Signed informed consent from patient or legal representative
* Patients on antiplatelet therapy may be recruited to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Anticoagulation - warfarin or heparin or novel oral anticoagulants
* Serious concomitant disorders that would compromise the safety of the patient or compromise the patient's ability to complete the study, at the discretion of the investigator.
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University Hospital, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soo Chin Lee
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National University Hospital, Singapore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nationa University Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Macrae JM, Dojcinovic I, Djurdjev O, Jung B, Shalansky S, Levin A, Kiaii M. Citrate 4% versus heparin and the reduction of thrombosis study (CHARTS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3(2):369-74. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01760407.
Grudzinski L, Quinan P, Kwok S, Pierratos A. Sodium citrate 4% locking solution for central venous dialysis catheters--an effective, more cost-efficient alternative to heparin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Feb;22(2):471-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl606. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
Weijmer MC, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Van De Vondervoort FJ, ter Wee PM. Superior antimicrobial activity of trisodium citrate over heparin for catheter locking. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Dec;17(12):2189-95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.12.2189.
Strauss RG. Mechanisms of adverse effects during hemapheresis. J Clin Apher. 1996;11(3):160-4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1101(1996)11:33.0.CO;2-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/01420
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.