Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-12
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vectored Thermal Pulsation, Intense Pulsed Light, and Eyelid Warm Compress Therapies for MGD
NCT05577910
Intense Regulated Pulsed Light Vs Standard of Care for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
NCT04920396
Effects and Prognostic Factors of Intensive Pulse Light Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
NCT03950115
Therapeutic Effectiveness of Different Machines in Intense Pulsed Light Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
NCT06034626
Modified Orbital Decompression in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Grave's Ophthalmopathy
NCT06588764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Histologic section through the normal meibomian glands and the obstructed human meibomian gland revealed that obstruction of orifice in MGD could lead to dilation of the central duct, damage of the secretory meibocytes and finally result in atrophy of dilated meibomian glands and glands drop-out. It was thus be accepted that detailed changes of meibomian glands morphology are key signs to diagnose and evaluate the severity of MGD. The detailed changes including dilation, distortion, shortening and loss of visualisation of glands which can be directly observed and visual assessment by the developed of non-contact meibomian gland infrared imaging technology. Quantitative evaluations of meibomian glands were obtain by developing imaging processing techniques. The most common use is the image editing software Image J (National Institute of Health; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij) which can identify the gland region on the image manually by the users and may lead to inter-observer variability. Koh et al., first applied original algorithms to automatically analysed gland loss in meibography images with a manually pre-processing. Reiko et al., then develop an objective and automatic system to measure the meibomian gland area. However, the existing methods of meibomian gland analysis have been limited to clinical use where large number of images needs to be analyzed efficiently due to the inter-observer variability or time-consuming process.
Meanwhile, the existing quantitative morphological parameters obtain by those imaging processing techniques, including percentage of MG drop-out and gland atrophy area, were suggested to not only be advanced stages or terminal changes in MGD, but also occurs as an age-related atrophic process. The early findings of MGD induced by the primary pathologic obstruction including degenerative gland dilation, irregularly shapes of gland and change of meibum quality are still difficult to be evaluated automatically and quantitively from the image. Moreover, the meibomian gland drop-out is still an approximate assessment without specific pattern. Whether the atrophy or loss occur in upper or lower eyelids, central, distal or proximal, total loss of gland or partial loss of gland has the greatest effect on the pathology progress of MGD will be important to identify. Thus, a comprehensive analysis technique to automatically detect multi-information of meibomian gland morphology will benefit the future early diagnosis and management of MGD.
Recently, an automated quantitative meibomian gland analyzer based on all kinds of infrared meibomian gland images was develop to obtain more detail in meibomian gland, including width, length, area, signal intensity correlated to the quality of meibum, deformation index and ratio of area of each visible specific gland. The purpose of this study is present as separate sections the following points: (1) to compared the detailed characteristics of meibomian glands in normal subjects and MGD patients by the automated quantitative analyzer; (2) to identify the inter-examiner and intra-examiner repeatability of the new technique; (3) to explore the correlation among morphological and functional parameters of meibomian gland and risk factors，clinical symptoms and signs; (4) to explore the sensitivity and specificity of meibomian gland morphological and functional parameters in MGD diagnosis. (5) using morphological and functional parameters as new assessment of MGD severity and efficacy indicators for treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MGD-thermal pulsation group
A 12 minutes LIPIFLOW treatment was performed.
Thermal pulsation
Participants underwent a single LipiFlow® thermal pulsation system (TearScience Inc., Morrisville, NC,USA) treatment on the first visit: after lid hygiene with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA) and instillation of anesthetic eye drops (Alcaine, proparacaine hydrochloride 0.4 ml/2mg) in both eyes, sterile eye cups were placed on to the conjunctival sac as instructed by the manufacturer, after 12 minutes of upper and lower palpebral conjunctival surfaces heat while simultaneously graded pulsatile pressure applying, eye cups were removed slightly.
MGD-IPL group
IPL was performed every 3 weeks，3 times in total (0, 3w, 6w).
Intense pulsed light therapy
Lid hygiene with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA) before treatment. Intense pulsed light (IPL) with a range of wavelength (570 or 620 nm) was performed every 3 weeks，3 times in total (0, 3w, 6w). 10 pulses were transmited from one tragus through nose to the other tragus was a single pass, each treatment needed to do 2 passes. Manual lid massage was done after per IPL treatment.
MGD-manual warm compresses
Manual warm compresses were performed every 2 weeks，5 times in total (0, 2w, 4w, 6w, 8w).
Manual warm compresses
Lids hygiene of both eyes with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA).Commercial heated eye patch was use for 10 min. Manual lid massage every 2 weeks, 5 times in total(0，2w, 4w, 4w, 8w).
Normal health subject group
Normal health subject without intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thermal pulsation
Participants underwent a single LipiFlow® thermal pulsation system (TearScience Inc., Morrisville, NC,USA) treatment on the first visit: after lid hygiene with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA) and instillation of anesthetic eye drops (Alcaine, proparacaine hydrochloride 0.4 ml/2mg) in both eyes, sterile eye cups were placed on to the conjunctival sac as instructed by the manufacturer, after 12 minutes of upper and lower palpebral conjunctival surfaces heat while simultaneously graded pulsatile pressure applying, eye cups were removed slightly.
Intense pulsed light therapy
Lid hygiene with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA) before treatment. Intense pulsed light (IPL) with a range of wavelength (570 or 620 nm) was performed every 3 weeks，3 times in total (0, 3w, 6w). 10 pulses were transmited from one tragus through nose to the other tragus was a single pass, each treatment needed to do 2 passes. Manual lid massage was done after per IPL treatment.
Manual warm compresses
Lids hygiene of both eyes with wet cotton swabs(OCuSOFT, Inc., Texas, USA).Commercial heated eye patch was use for 10 min. Manual lid massage every 2 weeks, 5 times in total(0，2w, 4w, 4w, 8w).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients and healthy volunteers who are willing and capable to participate in this clinical study with signed Informed Consent Form.
* Clinical diagnosis of MGD: The diagnosis of MGD was based on an altered quality of expressed secretions and/or decreased or absent expression.
* Patients without ≥2/3 Meibomian glands atrophy.
* Fitzpatrick skin type 1-4.
* Negative history or condition of ocular or systemic illness based on evaluation by a research physician.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients and healthy volunteers who have a history of ocular surface surgery.
* Patients and healthy volunteers who have active ocular surface infection or have suffered from ocular surface infection within one month.
* Patients and healthy volunteers who have endophthalmitis or a medical history of endophthalmitis.
* Patients and healthy volunteers who have a medical history of viral keratitis infection.
* Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study or breast-feeding (women of child-bearing age will be asked by the physician).
* Meibography images were blurred or with obvious tarsus folds, incomplete exposure and large hyperreflective area.
* Patients and healthy volunteers who are not suitable for the trial as determined by investigators.
* Patients have abnormalities of ocular surface function or eyelid function, or presence of precancerous lesions, cancer or pigmentation in the eyelid area.
* Patients who have plans to receive ocular surgeries (e.g., cataract, myopic refractive surgery) within 6 months.
* Patients who have been treated with lacrimal punctum embolization within one month.
* Patients with disease that could lead to ADDE, such as Sjogren syndrome and a lacrimal gland abnormality.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin Yuan
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jin Yuan, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Deng Yuqing
Guangzhou, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arita R, Suehiro J, Haraguchi T, Shirakawa R, Tokoro H, Amano S. Objective image analysis of the meibomian gland area. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;98(6):746-55. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-303014. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Craig JP, McCulley JP, Den S, Foulks GN. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1930-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997b. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.
Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;124(6):723-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71688-5.
Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand. Cornea. 2006 Dec;25(10):1162-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000244875.92879.1a.
Uchino M, Dogru M, Yagi Y, Goto E, Tomita M, Kon T, Saiki M, Matsumoto Y, Uchino Y, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S, Tsubota K. The features of dry eye disease in a Japanese elderly population. Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;83(11):797-802. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232814.39651.fa.
Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Maroun R, Wang JJ. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;31(3):229-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00634.x.
Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;136(2):318-26. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00218-6.
Wise RJ, Sobel RK, Allen RC. Meibography: A review of techniques and technologies. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;26(4):349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.08.007.
Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, Amano S, Paugh JR, Pearce EI, Yee R, Yokoi N, Arita R, Dogru M. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2006-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997f. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.
Simcock B. The role of the intrauterine device in contraceptive practice. Aust Fam Physician. 1976 Mar;5(2):124-39.
Knop E, Knop N, Brewitt H, Pleyer U, Rieck P, Seitz B, Schirra F. [Meibomian glands : part III. Dysfunction - argument for a discrete disease entity and as an important cause of dry eye]. Ophthalmologe. 2009 Nov;106(11):966-79. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-2043-9. German.
Arita R, Itoh K, Maeda S, Maeda K, Furuta A, Fukuoka S, Tomidokoro A, Amano S. Proposed diagnostic criteria for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2058-63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.037. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
Koh YW, Celik T, Lee HK, Petznick A, Tong L. Detection of meibomian glands and classification of meibography images. J Biomed Opt. 2012 Aug;17(8):086008. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.086008.
Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, Obata H, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1938-78. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997c. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20190722
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.