Comparison of CTG and T-PRF on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue

NCT ID: NCT04042194

Last Updated: 2019-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study aimed to increase the thickness of the gingiva and prevent possible crestal bone resorption by placing the CTG or T-PRF membrane under the mucosa immediately after the implant treatment in individuals with thin gingival phenotype. The null hypothesis was that T-PRF used simultaneously with implant placement can be considered an alternative to CTG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although connective tissue graft (CTG) is considered as the best technique for soft tissue augmentation, limited supply of donor tissue because of palatal vessels and nerves, and postoperative pain may require alternative methods.

The purpose of this study is to reduce the crestal bone resorption around the implant site by augmenting the Peri-Implant Soft Tissue with T-PRF (titanium prepared platelet-rich fibrin) or CTG and to compare the effectiveness of the two techniques.

Through simultaneous augmentation of the soft tissue by T-PRF or CTG, a total of 30 implants were implanted in 30 patients (12 males, 18 females) with a mean age of 38.4 years. In the test group, implants were placed in thin tissues and thickened with T- PRF membrane at the same time, while in the control group, implants were placed in thin tissues and thickened with CTG at the same time. During the surgery (T 0 ) and at postoperative 3 months (T 1 ), keratinised tissue width (KTW) and Peri-Implant soft tissue thickness (STT) were measured from three points: occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), and over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peri-implant Mucositis Peri-Implantitis Thin Gingiva

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thickened with T-PRF

Following local anaesthesia, the measurement of soft tissue thickness at three points \[1) occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), 2) midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), 3) over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1)\] was performed with an endodontic spreader and digital caliber. Following the mid-crestal incision, the buccal flap was raised with double layer technique, while the lingual flap was left to enable direct visibility. The implant bed was drilled according to the manufacturer's protocol. The implants (BEGO Semados® RS/RSX implant system, Bremen, Germany) were placed at the bony crest. Right after the implant placement, the randomisation procedure was performed. In this group, the implants were placed in thin tissues, and T-PRF was inserted in the prepared mucoperiosteal flap at the facial site and secured with horizontal mattresses.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with T-PRF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A total of 40 ml blood sample was collected from the antecubital vein of the patients' right or left arms with 10 ml injectors. 40 ml blood was transferred to a grade-IV titanium tube for the T-PRF group. The titanium tubes containing the blood samples were instantly centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge at room temperature. The blood samples of the T-PRF group were centrifuged clockwise at 2700 RPM for 20 minutes. Subsequent to the centrifugation process, the clots of the T-PRF group were removed from the tubes with sterile tweezers, separated from the RBC base with scissors, and left for over 20 minutes on sterile woven gauze to release the serum slowly from the collected clots. The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with T-PRF.

Thickened with CTG

Following local anaesthesia, the measurement of soft tissue thickness at three points \[1) occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), 2) midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), 3) over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1)\] was performed with an endodontic spreader and digital caliber. Following the mid-crestal incision, the buccal flap was raised with double layer technique, while the lingual flap was left to enable direct visibility. The implant bed was drilled according to the manufacturer's protocol. The implants (BEGO Semados® RS/RSX implant system, Bremen, Germany) were placed at the bony crest. Right after the implant placement, the randomisation procedure was performed. In this group, the implants were placed in thin tissues, and CTG was inserted in the prepared mucoperiosteal flap at the facial site and secured with horizontal mattresses.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with CTG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with CTG. Autogenous connective tissue graft was harvested according to a single incision technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with T-PRF

A total of 40 ml blood sample was collected from the antecubital vein of the patients' right or left arms with 10 ml injectors. 40 ml blood was transferred to a grade-IV titanium tube for the T-PRF group. The titanium tubes containing the blood samples were instantly centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge at room temperature. The blood samples of the T-PRF group were centrifuged clockwise at 2700 RPM for 20 minutes. Subsequent to the centrifugation process, the clots of the T-PRF group were removed from the tubes with sterile tweezers, separated from the RBC base with scissors, and left for over 20 minutes on sterile woven gauze to release the serum slowly from the collected clots. The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with T-PRF.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with CTG

The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with CTG. Autogenous connective tissue graft was harvested according to a single incision technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients older than 18 years,
* thin gingiva biotype,
* one missing tooth in the incisor, canine and premolar area and presence of two natural adjacent teeth
* no bone increasing procedures prior to and during dental implant,

Exclusion Criteria

* history of a bleeding disorder or on anticoagulant therapy,
* immunocompromised state and debilitating disease,
* smoking and alcoholism,
* poor oral hygiene,
* diabetes.
Minimum Eligible Age

29 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abant Izzet Baysal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gulbahar

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gülbahar Ustaoğlu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Abant Izzet Baysal University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Bolu, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/68

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Interdental Guided Creeping Technique
NCT06264869 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA