Study of HEMAX PFS Versus EPREX/ ERYPO® in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT ID: NCT04036253
Last Updated: 2025-03-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-28
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Subcutaneous Eporon Versus Epoetin Alfa (Eprex)
NCT03521713
Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Multicenter Safety Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Subcutaneous EPO HEXAL vs. ERYPO® in the Treatment of Anemia Associated With Chronic Renal Insufficiency in Predialysis Patients
NCT00701714
Comparative Study of Two Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Products in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
NCT06352138
A Phase 3, Long-Term Safety Study of Subcutaneous Epoetin Hospira in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure Requiring Hemodialysis and Receiving Epoetin Maintenance Treatment. AiME -Anemia Management With Epoetin
NCT01628120
Biosimilar Erythropoietin in Anaemia Treatment (Maintenance Phase Study)
NCT02947438
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This trial was open-label for both the patient and the investigator, but blinded in the performance of laboratory analyses.
The overall objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of HEMAX® PFS compared to EPREX/ERYPO®, following a dose-titration and maintenance scheme similar to the one used in the regular clinical practice.
All patients received HEMAX® PFS or EPREX/ERYPO® twice a week subcutaneously during 12 weeks of titration, switching then to an equivalent weekly dose during 12 additional maintenance weeks. During the dosing scheme switch from twice a week to once weekly, each patient continued receiving the treatment assigned at randomization.
The study conclude with n=43 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Eprex/Erypo
Receive EPREX/ ERYPO® subcutaneously with an initial dose of 29 IU/ kg twice a week (2000 IU twice a week for 70 kg of weight), to be titrated according to the scheme that is summarized below.
There will be a follow - up of patients with visits to the site every two weeks during the first 12 weeks of dose titration that will be followed by 12 additional weeks of dose maintenance with visits every 4 weeks.
Erythropoietin alfa
Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin
Hemax PFS
receive HEMAX® PFS subcutaneously with an initial dose of 29 IU/ kg twice a week (2000 IU twice a week for 70 kg of weight), to be titrated according to the scheme that is summarized below.
There will be a follow - up of patients with visits to the site every two weeks during the first 12 weeks of dose titration that will be followed by 12 additional weeks of dose maintenance with visits every 4 weeks.
Erythropoietin alfa
Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erythropoietin alfa
Prefilled syringes of erythropoietin
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with pre-dialysis chronic renal failure (CRF) defined by a glomerular filtration rate (calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study formula) ≥15 ml/ min and \<60 ml/ min, by 1.73 m2
* Anemic patients that should be treated and levels of hemoglobin \<10.5 g/dl and ≥ 7.5 g/dl.
* Patients that have the will and capacity to sign a written inform consent.
* Post-menopause women for at least 2 years, or sterile by surgery for at least 6 months. Women of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline and be willing to get an adequate method of contraception.
Exclusion Criteria
* Transferrin iron Saturation \< 20%.
* Etiology of renal failure (as secondary to autoimmune diseases) that, to the judge to the physician, can affect the normal development of the protocol.
* Active bleeding or history of hemorrhage that have led to a significative decrease of hematocrit in the last 30 days.
* Non-controlled hypertension (≥160 mm Hg of systolic pressure and/or ≥100 mm Hg of diastolic pressure with anti-hypertensive treatment).
* Anemia caused by any other cause than renal disease.
* Having a transfusion in the last 3 months before basal visit or during screening.
* Treatment with an erythropoiesis stimulant in the last 3 months before basal visit or screening.
* Increase risk of thromboembolic disease: history of arterial thromboembolia (stroke, transient ischemic attack, Acute coronary syndrome, etc.) in the last 6 months or venous in the last 12 months before screening; surgery in the last month before screening; prolong immobilization or orthopedic surgery programmed in the following 6 months or any other condition that to the judge of the investigator can increase the risk of thromboembolism.
* Hematological disease or myelodysplastic syndrome or history of hematological neoplasm or solid tumor in the last 5 years.
* History of congestive heart failure
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Refuse to participate in the protocol or any medical condition, that in the investigator opinion, is significant to prevent the participant from being included in the trial.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bio Sidus SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diego Ambrogetti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto de Investigaciones médicas Alfredo Lanari
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CEMEDIC
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
CEREHA
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
CIMEL
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
CIPREC (Centro de Investigación y Prevención Cardiovascular)
CABA, , Argentina
GEMA Consultorio
Caba, , Argentina
Hospital Argerich
CABA, , Argentina
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires
CABA, , Argentina
Hospital Durand
CABA, , Argentina
Hospital Fernandez
CABA, , Argentina
Hospital Ramos Mejía
CABA, , Argentina
IPHIC
Asunción, , Paraguay
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIOS-HPFS-0115
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.