Implementing Patients´ Competence in Oral Breast Cancer Therapy
NCT ID: NCT04030728
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Total Enrollment
212 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2020-03-31
Study Completion Date
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the IMPACT - Implementing Patients' competence in oral breast cancer therapy - study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized patient education and coaching and optional eMBSR for therapy management provided by specially trained oncology nurses regarding persistence rate, side effects management and unplanned therapy interruptions in outpatient oncology care for patients under Abemaciclib treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neoadjuvant Study Chemotherapy vs Letrozole + Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- High/Intermediate Risk Breast Cancer Patients
NCT04293393
Early Breast Cancer
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
Adherence to Aromatase Inhibitors ± Abemaciclib Treatment in Patients With Early-stage HER2-negative Breast Cancer
NCT06650423
Early Breast Cancer
Hormone Receptor Positive Tumor
HER2-negative Breast Cancer
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Breast Cancer Pathways Program Impact on Patient Shared Decision Making and Experience in Academic and Community Practice
NCT04297384
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Breast Carcinoma
Metastatic Breast Carcinoma
+2 more
COMPLETED
NA
Mathematical Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
NCT03983538
Breast Cancer
COMPLETED
6xFU/Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide (FEC) Compared to 3xFEC-3xDocetaxel in High-risk Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients
NCT01222052
Breast Cancer
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Breast cancer therapy has advanced by far over the last decade. Introduction of novel therapies as well as the introduction of mammography screening are thought to have reduced mortality over the last decade. More women are treated on an individual basis, trying to avoid toxic and non-effective therapies.
However, every year about 18.000 women are diagnosed with metastastic breast cancer in Germany. Breast cancer remains one of the main reasons for deaths among women and is the main reason for death due to cancer in younger women.
Once a tumor is metastasized, well balanced treatment decisions have to be made to take both into consideration, a high chance of tumor control and a low risk for side effects. Especially in the metastatic setting symptom control and quality of life need to be in the focus of the therapy and patient care.
Modern anticancer strategies are designed against specific molecular targets with the goal of sparing normal, non-neoplastic tissues. Choosing specific molecular targets, however, is problematic. CDK4/6 (Cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6) are important candidate targets for therapeutic intervention.
Traditionally, anticancer therapy has been dominated by intravenous drug therapy. However, oral agents, like CDK4/6 inhibitors, provide an attractive approach to this kind of treatment and use of oral treatments is increasing. Currently, there are three CDK4/6 inhibitors that have reached clinical practice in the management of ER+ HER2- advanced disease. One of them is Ademaciclib which is approved in the US since September 2017 for "adult patients who have hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after taking therapy that alters a patient's hormones".
Oral agents for cancer treatment are increasingly prescribed due to their benefits. However, this type of therapy requires a high level of self-management competence by the patient. A standardized patient education provided by physicians and oncology nurses may influence the handling of the oral agents in a positive way regarding side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions.
When it comes to oral agents, the place of treatment is the patients' home. In this treatment setting, correct treatment management cannot be utilized without identifying a patient's needs to be empowered to become an expert of his/her treatment because cancer therapies are commonly difficult to handle and the medication often shows a high risk of side effects and interactions with other drugs. Care providers are challenged by the question of how mostly elderly and multimorbid patients and their supporting relatives can be enabled with essential competencies to manage their treatment by themselves. Before patients start their cancer therapy, they are usually provided with information about the treatment by their physician. However, patients often feel overwhelmed by all the details in this stressful situation and tend to have a reduced capacity to assimilate complex information. Education and additional support at the beginning and in the course of the treatment can be a useful approach for patients to better handle this situation.
Recent studies showed the positive impact of supportive care programs on patients provided by nurses. Patient-focused motivation techniques and education performed by nurses are suitable to strengthen the patients' understanding of risks and benefits from the anti-cancer treatment and oral agents. These care programs can prevent an incorrect medication intake due to misunderstandings, lead to a decrease of treatment-related symptoms like pain and fatigue and reduce critical events. In addition, patient education can facilitate supportive care through a better communication between patient and health care provider and may advance the early detection of adverse toxicity events and foster rapid symptom management.
Mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) shows a positive effect on mental health in breast cancer patients. The evidence confirms that MBSR reduces anxiety, depressiveness and stress of breast cancer patients and increases the health-related quality of life. A key ingredient to reduce the damaging effects of chronic stress, reducing distress, and improving quality of life is to have patients engage in behaviors that decrease sympathetic and increase parasympathetic arousal. Studies show that MBSR have a positive effect on many systems in our body and create fundamental changes in the way the brain functions. MBSR can affect neurotransmitters (i.e. glutamate, GABA) and neuromodulators (i.e. dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine), which are essential in maintaining a healthy balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic arousal, therefore, helping to manage the stress response.
The aim of the IMPACT - Implementing Patients' competence in oral breast cancer therapy - study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized patient education and coaching and optional eMBSR for therapy management provided by specially trained oncology nurses regarding persistence rate, side effects management and unplanned therapy interruptions in outpatient oncology care for patients under Abemaciclib treatment.
However, every year about 18.000 women are diagnosed with metastastic breast cancer in Germany. Breast cancer remains one of the main reasons for deaths among women and is the main reason for death due to cancer in younger women.
Once a tumor is metastasized, well balanced treatment decisions have to be made to take both into consideration, a high chance of tumor control and a low risk for side effects. Especially in the metastatic setting symptom control and quality of life need to be in the focus of the therapy and patient care.
Modern anticancer strategies are designed against specific molecular targets with the goal of sparing normal, non-neoplastic tissues. Choosing specific molecular targets, however, is problematic. CDK4/6 (Cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6) are important candidate targets for therapeutic intervention.
Traditionally, anticancer therapy has been dominated by intravenous drug therapy. However, oral agents, like CDK4/6 inhibitors, provide an attractive approach to this kind of treatment and use of oral treatments is increasing. Currently, there are three CDK4/6 inhibitors that have reached clinical practice in the management of ER+ HER2- advanced disease. One of them is Ademaciclib which is approved in the US since September 2017 for "adult patients who have hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after taking therapy that alters a patient's hormones".
Oral agents for cancer treatment are increasingly prescribed due to their benefits. However, this type of therapy requires a high level of self-management competence by the patient. A standardized patient education provided by physicians and oncology nurses may influence the handling of the oral agents in a positive way regarding side effects and unplanned therapy interruptions.
When it comes to oral agents, the place of treatment is the patients' home. In this treatment setting, correct treatment management cannot be utilized without identifying a patient's needs to be empowered to become an expert of his/her treatment because cancer therapies are commonly difficult to handle and the medication often shows a high risk of side effects and interactions with other drugs. Care providers are challenged by the question of how mostly elderly and multimorbid patients and their supporting relatives can be enabled with essential competencies to manage their treatment by themselves. Before patients start their cancer therapy, they are usually provided with information about the treatment by their physician. However, patients often feel overwhelmed by all the details in this stressful situation and tend to have a reduced capacity to assimilate complex information. Education and additional support at the beginning and in the course of the treatment can be a useful approach for patients to better handle this situation.
Recent studies showed the positive impact of supportive care programs on patients provided by nurses. Patient-focused motivation techniques and education performed by nurses are suitable to strengthen the patients' understanding of risks and benefits from the anti-cancer treatment and oral agents. These care programs can prevent an incorrect medication intake due to misunderstandings, lead to a decrease of treatment-related symptoms like pain and fatigue and reduce critical events. In addition, patient education can facilitate supportive care through a better communication between patient and health care provider and may advance the early detection of adverse toxicity events and foster rapid symptom management.
Mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) shows a positive effect on mental health in breast cancer patients. The evidence confirms that MBSR reduces anxiety, depressiveness and stress of breast cancer patients and increases the health-related quality of life. A key ingredient to reduce the damaging effects of chronic stress, reducing distress, and improving quality of life is to have patients engage in behaviors that decrease sympathetic and increase parasympathetic arousal. Studies show that MBSR have a positive effect on many systems in our body and create fundamental changes in the way the brain functions. MBSR can affect neurotransmitters (i.e. glutamate, GABA) and neuromodulators (i.e. dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine), which are essential in maintaining a healthy balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic arousal, therefore, helping to manage the stress response.
The aim of the IMPACT - Implementing Patients' competence in oral breast cancer therapy - study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized patient education and coaching and optional eMBSR for therapy management provided by specially trained oncology nurses regarding persistence rate, side effects management and unplanned therapy interruptions in outpatient oncology care for patients under Abemaciclib treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Advanced Breast Cancer
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Standardized coaching arm
Patients in this group receive a continuous standardized MOATT based patient education and coaching and optional eMBSR (electronic Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction) within the first 24 weeks of Abemaciclib treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 2: Coaching according to local practice
Patients in this group receive a patient management according local routine.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult breast cancer patients (age ≥18 years).
* Patients with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer proven by clinical measures (i. e. standard imaging) whose disease has progressed after hormonal therapy in combination with fulvestrant, or alone in women whose disease has progressed after hormone therapy and prior chemotherapy (advanced disease must not be amenable to resection with curative intent).
* Patients treated with Abemaciclib according to the SmPC and each center´s medical practice.
* Informed consent prior to onset of documentation.
* Patients with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer proven by clinical measures (i. e. standard imaging) whose disease has progressed after hormonal therapy in combination with fulvestrant, or alone in women whose disease has progressed after hormone therapy and prior chemotherapy (advanced disease must not be amenable to resection with curative intent).
* Patients treated with Abemaciclib according to the SmPC and each center´s medical practice.
* Informed consent prior to onset of documentation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with serious preexisting medical condition(s) that would preclude participation in this study (for example, interstitial lung disease, severe dyspnea at rest or requiring oxygen therapy, history of major surgical resection involving the stomach or small bowel, or preexisting Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis or a preexisting chronic condition resulting in baseline Grade 2 or higher diarrhea).
* Females who are pregnant or lactating.
* Patients with active bacterial infections (requiring intravenous \[IV\] antibiotics at time of initiating study treatment), fungal infections, or detectable viral infections (such as known human immunodeficiency virus positivity or with known active hepatitis B or C \[for example, hepatitis B surface antigen positive\]. Screening is not required for enrollment.
* Patients with a personal history in the past 5 years of any of the following conditions: syncope of cardiovascular etiology, ventricular arrhythmia of pathological origin (including, but not limited to, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation), or sudden cardiac arrest.
* Patients with contraindications against Abemaciclib according to respective SmPC´s.
* Patients who are not eligible for observation due to severe comorbidities other then mentioned above or unavailability according to the treating physician.
* Females who are pregnant or lactating.
* Patients with active bacterial infections (requiring intravenous \[IV\] antibiotics at time of initiating study treatment), fungal infections, or detectable viral infections (such as known human immunodeficiency virus positivity or with known active hepatitis B or C \[for example, hepatitis B surface antigen positive\]. Screening is not required for enrollment.
* Patients with a personal history in the past 5 years of any of the following conditions: syncope of cardiovascular etiology, ventricular arrhythmia of pathological origin (including, but not limited to, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation), or sudden cardiac arrest.
* Patients with contraindications against Abemaciclib according to respective SmPC´s.
* Patients who are not eligible for observation due to severe comorbidities other then mentioned above or unavailability according to the treating physician.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eli Lilly and Company
INDUSTRY
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Institut fuer Frauengesundheit
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Onco Medical Consult GmbH
INDUSTRY
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hans Tesch, Prof. Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Onkologie Bethanien Frankfurt
Manfred Welslau, Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Onkologie Aschaffenburg
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bock K, Heywang-Kobrunner S, Regitz-Jedermann L, Hecht G, Kaab-Sanyal V. [Mammography screening in Germany. Current results and future challenges]. Radiologe. 2014 Mar;54(3):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00117-013-2581-7. German.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Katalinic A. Epidemiology of Breast Cancer - Current Figures and Trends. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Feb;73(2):130-135. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328075.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kolberg HC, Luftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Schutz F, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Janni W, Kummel S. Breast Cancer 2012 - New Aspects. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Jul;72(7):602-615. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315131.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Maass N, Schutz F, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Janni W, Kummel S, Kolberg HC, Luftner D, Wallwiener M, Lux MP. Breast Cancer Update 2014 - Focus on the Patient and the Tumour. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Feb;75(2):170-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545704.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Loehberg CR, Almstedt K, Jud SM, Haeberle L, Fasching PA, Hack CC, Lux MP, Thiel FC, Schrauder MG, Brunner M, Bayer CM, Hein A, Heusinger K, Heimrich J, Bani MR, Renner SP, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Wachter DL. Prognostic relevance of Ki-67 in the primary tumor for survival after a diagnosis of distant metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):899-908. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2460-y. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fasching PA, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Overkamp F, Janni W, Wallwiener M, Hadji P, Belleville E, Haberle L, Taran FA, Luftner D, Lux MP, Ettl J, Muller V, Tesch H, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A. Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and the PRAEGNANT Study Network. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Jan;75(1):41-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396215.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wadler S. Perspectives for cancer therapies with cdk2 inhibitors. Drug Resist Updat. 2001 Dec;4(6):347-67. doi: 10.1054/drup.2001.0224.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Banna GL, Collova E, Gebbia V, Lipari H, Giuffrida P, Cavallaro S, Condorelli R, Buscarino C, Tralongo P, Ferrau F. Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Dec;36(8):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Schilder CM, Seynaeve C, Linn SC, Boogerd W, Beex LV, Gundy CM, Nortier JW, van de Velde CJ, van Dam FS, Schagen SB. Cognitive functioning of postmenopausal breast cancer patients before adjuvant systemic therapy, and its association with medical and psychological factors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Nov;76(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
May P, Figgins B. Oral anticancer therapy: a comprehensive assessment of patient perceptions and challenges. J Community Support Oncol. 2016 Mar;14(3):112-6. doi: 10.12788/jcso.0226.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Molassiotis A, Brearley S, Saunders M, Craven O, Wardley A, Farrell C, Swindell R, Todd C, Luker K. Effectiveness of a home care nursing program in the symptom management of patients with colorectal and breast cancer receiving oral chemotherapy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6191-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6755. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bordonaro S, Romano F, Lanteri E, Cappuccio F, Indorato R, Butera A, D'Angelo A, Ferrau F, Tralongo P. Effect of a structured, active, home-based cancer-treatment program for the management of patients on oral chemotherapy. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jun 25;8:917-23. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S62666. eCollection 2014.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chau I, Legge S, Fumoleau P. The vital role of education and information in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda). Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8 Suppl 1:S41-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2004.06.008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, Gallagher ER, Jackson VA, Lynch TJ, Lennes IT, Dahlin CM, Pirl WF. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2319-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4459. Epub 2011 May 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Campbell CP. An oral cancer therapy nurse navigator role. Can Nurse. 2016 Apr;112(3):26-7. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cramer H, Lauche R, Paul A, Dobos G. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(5):e343-52. doi: 10.3747/co.19.1016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chaoul A, Milbury K, Sood AK, Prinsloo S, Cohen L. Mind-body practices in cancer care. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):417. doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0417-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carlson LE, Doll R, Stephen J, Faris P, Tamagawa R, Drysdale E, Speca M. Randomized controlled trial of Mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;31(25):3119-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.5210. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Holzel BK, Carmody J, Vangel M, Congleton C, Yerramsetti SM, Gard T, Lazar SW. Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Jan 30;191(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matchim Y, Armer JM, Stewart BR. Mindfulness-based stress reduction among breast cancer survivors: a literature review and discussion. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Mar;38(2):E61-71. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.E61-E71.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Musial F, Bussing A, Heusser P, Choi KE, Ostermann T. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for integrative cancer care: a summary of evidence. Forsch Komplementmed. 2011;18(4):192-202. doi: 10.1159/000330714. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Piet J, Wurtzen H, Zachariae R. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Dec;80(6):1007-20. doi: 10.1037/a0028329. Epub 2012 May 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zainal NZ, Booth S, Huppert FA. The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction on mental health of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1457-65. doi: 10.1002/pon.3171. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wurtzen H, Dalton SO, Elsass P, Sumbundu AD, Steding-Jensen M, Karlsen RV, Andersen KK, Flyger HL, Pedersen AE, Johansen C. Mindfulness significantly reduces self-reported levels of anxiety and depression: results of a randomised controlled trial among 336 Danish women treated for stage I-III breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.030. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shennan C, Payne S, Fenlon D. What is the evidence for the use of mindfulness-based interventions in cancer care? A review. Psychooncology. 2011 Jul;20(7):681-97. doi: 10.1002/pon.1819. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OMC2018/01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
EHR-embedded OCDT in Breast or GI Cancer
NCT03858712
COMPLETED
NA
Chemotherapy-induced Lipid Profile Changes in Women With Early Breast Cancer
NCT06958783
COMPLETED
Chemotherapy Omission in HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer With Lymph Node Negative Disease Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibitor
NCT06996093
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
Application Of Epirubicin Within A Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy In Patients With Primary Breast Cancer
NCT01061359
COMPLETED
Adjuvant Therapy With Abemaciclib + SOC ET vs. SOC ET in Clinical or Genomic High Risk, HR+/HER2- EBC
NCT04565054
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
Effect of Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Systemic Therapy on Breast Cancers, Bone Marrow Cancer Cells, and Circulating Cancer Cells
NCT00353483
RECRUITING
Assessing the Efficacy of Paclitaxel and Olaparib in Comparison to Paclitaxel / Carboplatin Followed by Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer and Homologous Recombination Deficiency
NCT02789332
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Anthracycline-free Taxane Based Chemotherapy in Patients With HER2/Neu Negative Early Breast Cancer
NCT01049425
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Neo-adjuvant Gemcitabine, Epirubicin, ABI-007 (GEA) in Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT00193206
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus a Cytotoxic Agent Versus Two Cytotoxic Agents
NCT00191438
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Impact of Endocrine Therapy and Abemaciclib on Host and Tumor Immune Cell Repertoire/Function in Advanced ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
NCT04352777
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Minus Anthracycline or Short-Term Versus Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Regimen for Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy
NCT01314833
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Initial CDK 4/6 Inhibitor Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Initial Chemotherapy in HR Positive, HER2 Negative Unresectable or Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT06344793
COMPLETED
Risk and Clinical Benefit of Chemotherapy and Intensive Endocrine Therapy for Luminal B1 Early-stage Breast Cancer
NCT03373708
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With Resected Breast Cancer
NCT00033683
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Evaluating Efficacy and Tolerability of Anticancer Drug Therapies for the Treatment of Gynecologic and Breast Cancers
NCT06800612
RECRUITING
Single Cell Immune and Non-immune Correlates of Response to Neoadjuvant Abemaciclib
NCT04614194
RECRUITING
PHASE2
Safety & Efficacy of Three Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy Regimens Plus Bevacizumab With or Without Trastuzumab for Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT00365365
COMPLETED
PHASE2
PrefeRences And ChemoTherapy In Breast Cancer patiEnts
NCT06332976
RECRUITING
Tailoring NEOadjuvant Therapy in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative, Luminal Breast Cancer.
NCT03283384
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
Feasibility Study of Metronomic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
NCT01329627
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel-Gemcitabine in Breast Cancer
NCT00191243
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Docetaxel or Paclitaxel in Treating Women With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00006120
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
Anti Cancer Stem Cell Activity of Pre-operative Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
NCT01190345
COMPLETED
PHASE2