HoloLens: an Objective Alternative to the Operator's Memory
NCT ID: NCT04028284
Last Updated: 2025-01-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-18
2021-02-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real-time Ultrasound-guided Spinal Anesthesia:A Feasibility Study
NCT01326988
Comparison of Safety And Efficacy of Neuraxial Anesthesia, Palpation Versus Ultrasound
NCT01322126
A Study to Evaluate Virtual Reality As Adjunct to Anesthesia During Orthopedic Surgery
NCT05112302
Ultrasound Guided Peribulbar Anaesthesia - A Novel Dual Quadrant Injection Technique
NCT02459782
Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Poorly-palpable Surface Landmarks
NCT03377764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that using augmented reality through HoloLens will lead to implementation of a newly developed virtual holographic 'see-through' tool for neuraxial anesthetic techniques that will increase needle accuracy and decrease procedure time.
The main question of the study is to assess the accuracy of the developed application. In particular, the study will determine if a holographic marking of the site of needle insertion and optimal angulation will increase needle accuracy and reduce procedure time by increasing first past success when compared to traditional ultrasound land-mark based techniques.
The methodology proposed in this study is truly innovative in medical content, involves a partnership with software and engineering experts. The study will lead to implementation of a new objective tool, validation of which will create an accessible, cost-effective piece of technology that will reduce patient morbidity and increase procedure success rate. This 'state-of-the-art' technology can be used for alternate procedures such as peripheral nerve block in patients that cannot be easily positioned for live US techniques. Also, this study will generate a knowledge-based approach that can be used as a teaching and clinical tool locally at institutions presented with anatomically difficult population (e.g. trauma, obstetric patients) at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and around the world, where resources are at a minimum.
This is a prospective cohort randomized trial. With institutional ethical approval and having obtained both, written informed consent and verbal assent from participants, 84 thoracic epidural events will be assessed. A thoracic spine US 3D Phantom model utilizing open source BodyParts3D library anatomy files constructed by group of software and engineering experts, and accessible for practice to anesthetists. Our 3D Phantom model has similar palpation characteristics to a patient mimicking a standard loss of resistance to saline that occurs on entrance of a needle to the spinal canal cavity. The holographic mapping methodology will be practiced by anesthetists on the Phantom model until they feel comfortable with the system prior the study start. Participants will be recruited from the pre-anesthesia clinic. Only participants who meet inclusion criteria will be approached for participation in this study (Table 1,inclusion/exclusion criteria, study protocol). The anesthetists will be randomized to: Group1, landmark based thoracic epidural technique(control) or, Group 2, HoloLens-assisted thoracic epidural technique(intervention), where the needle will be inserted using instantly created holographic trajectory. SHS centre has a dedicated regional block room and four regional expert anesthetists in the US-guided thoracic epidural technique and are comfortable with the HoloLens. Prior to the study start, anesthetists will practice needle insertion on the phantom model by attempting needle insertion 20Xeach, or until they felt comfortable with the tool, while wearing HoloLens. Other aspects of patient care will follow the standard of care at the centre. Data will be collected by anesthetists and include patients surgical/abdominal pain assessment during epidural procedure and post-operatively, and questionnaire about their experience using the HoloLens.
Data will be validated to enable optimization and further implementation of novel technology.
1. Inclusion Criteria/Anesthetists:
* Trained in US-guided epidural technique with fellowship
* Performed \>100 thoracic US-guided epidural procedures
2. Exclusion Criteria/Patients:
* age \>18
* Lack of verbal patient assent after study introduction
The control group will be required to determine if hologram mapping and methodology indeed provide an accuracy of the holographic trajectory and create a live road map for the needle path hidden under the patient's skin. Study participants will be withdrawn from the study at their request at any time.
To address this study specific objectives of whether the HoloLens application, that is designed to allow a holographic marking of the needle insertion site and optimal angulation would 1) decrease procedure time by increasing first past success when used as a guide to the thoracic epidural space; and 2) increase needle accuracy when compared to traditional ultrasound landmark based techniques, an observer (i.e. anesthesiologist) will document following:
1. the time to procedure completion starting from skin puncture to time at which the Tuohy needle is withdrawn;
2. the number of a needle movements (in any direction/re-direction)
3. number of skin punctures made;
4. patients' pain score during the procedure and post-operatively using the numeric rating scale (NRS);
5. any complications during the procedure such as paresthesias, dural punctures;
6. the need for patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in PACU (constituting failure of epidural).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
In Group 1 (control), the staff anesthesiologist will follow the traditional technique for US-guided thoracic epidural insertion. Briefly, the anesthesiologist will use the US to identify and mark the appropriate spot for placement of the thoracic epidural catheter. The US probe is then placed at rest and the anesthesiologist will proceed with thoracic epidural needle insertion following standard techniques.
US-guided epidural
traditional thoracic epidural procedure
Group 2
In Group 2 (intervention), the staff anesthesiologist will use the HoloLens tool to assist with the traditional technique as described above for Group 1. In combination with the US, a hologram image of the trajectory towards the epidural space will be generated, thereby mitigating the need to walk off the lamina. The holographic system will mark the appropriate spot for placement of the thoracic epidural catheter. Then, the needle will be inserted following the holographic trajectory overlaid on the patient's back.
HoloLens-guided epidural
To determine whether using the HoloLens tool increases the success of epidural insertion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HoloLens-guided epidural
To determine whether using the HoloLens tool increases the success of epidural insertion.
US-guided epidural
traditional thoracic epidural procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Performed \>100 thoracic US-guided epidural procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of verbal patient assent after study introduction
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Fahad Alam
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wiegelmann J, Choi S, McHardy PG, Matava C, Singer O, Kaustov L, Alam F. Randomized control trial of a holographic needle guidance technique for thoracic epidural placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec 2;49(12):861-866. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104703.
Tanwani J, Alam F, Matava C, Choi S, McHardy P, Singer O, Cheong G, Wiegelmann J. Development of a Head-Mounted Holographic Needle Guidance System for Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anesthesia: System Development and Observational Evaluation. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 23;6(6):e36931. doi: 10.2196/36931.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hololens
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.