Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

NCT ID: NCT03316352

Last Updated: 2018-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-24

Study Completion Date

2018-01-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multiple passes and attempts during spinal anesthesia might be associated with a greater incidence of paraesthesia, postdural puncture headache, and spinal hematoma. We hypothesized that the use of a preprocedural ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique for spinal anesthesia in patients with old age would reduce the number of passes required to entry into the subarachnoid space when compared with the landmark-guided paramedian approach. The study participants will be randomized into group L (landmark-guided) and group U (ultrasound-assisted). In group L, spinal anesthesia will be performed via paramedian approach using conventional landmark palpation technique. In group U, a preprocedural ultrasound scan will be used to mark the needle insertion site, and spinal anesthetic will be done via the paramedian approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Spinal Ultrasonography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound-assisted

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique spinal anesthesia will be performed. A Preprocedural ultrasound scan will be performed for skin marking of entry site of spinal needle. Spinal anesthesia will be performed via paramedian approach using the skin marking site as entry point. 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique will be used. A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be performed, and skin marking for spinal entry site will be done using ultrasound scan. Spinal anesthesia will be done according to skin marking using ultrasound, via paramedian approach.

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be done using Portable Echocardiography system (Vivid-i, GE healthcare) with 4C-RS convex probe (2.0-5.5 MHz Frequency range).

0.5% heavy bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

During spinal anesthesia, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space. The dose of local anesthetic injected for spinal anesthesia will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The dose range of intrathecal bupivacaine will be between 12 and 16 mg.

Landmark-guided

In these patients, spinal anesthesia will be performed via paramedian approach using conventional landmark palpation technique. Landmark-guided paramedian technique spinal anesthesia will be performed. 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Landmark-guided paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Landmark-guided paramedian technique will be used. Spinal anesthesia will be done using conventional landmark-guided paramedian technique.

0.5% heavy bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

During spinal anesthesia, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space. The dose of local anesthetic injected for spinal anesthesia will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The dose range of intrathecal bupivacaine will be between 12 and 16 mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique will be used. A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be performed, and skin marking for spinal entry site will be done using ultrasound scan. Spinal anesthesia will be done according to skin marking using ultrasound, via paramedian approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Landmark-guided paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Landmark-guided paramedian technique will be used. Spinal anesthesia will be done using conventional landmark-guided paramedian technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound

A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be done using Portable Echocardiography system (Vivid-i, GE healthcare) with 4C-RS convex probe (2.0-5.5 MHz Frequency range).

Intervention Type DEVICE

0.5% heavy bupivacaine

During spinal anesthesia, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space. The dose of local anesthetic injected for spinal anesthesia will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The dose range of intrathecal bupivacaine will be between 12 and 16 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sono-assisted conventional sonography bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elderly patients (age≄60 years) scheduled to undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia
* Patients with ASA physical status classification I, II, III

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with contraindication to spinal anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection, allergy to local anesthetic)
* Patients with morbid cardiac diseases
* Pregnancy
* Patients with previous history of lumbar spine surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jin-Tae Kim

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jin-Tae Kim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan K, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Conventional Landmark-Guided Midline Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):1089-1096. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000911.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26270115 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan V, Brown-Shreves D, Koshkin A, Vaishnav V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8ad4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21572316 (View on PubMed)

Park SK, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim YJ, Bahk JH, Kim JT. Ultrasound-assisted vs. landmark-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;36(10):763-771. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001029.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31188153 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1708-113-879

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT02553746 COMPLETED NA
Retrolaminar Analgesia for LuMbar Surgery
NCT07334288 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA