Intraoperative Pain and Quality of Surgical Block During Shoulder Surgery Assessed by NOL Index

NCT ID: NCT04015284

Last Updated: 2021-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-15

Study Completion Date

2019-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery is typically achieved by providing an interscalene brachial plexus block. However, a very common side effect of this block is hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, a state which may not be tolerated in patients with pulmonary conditions such as COPD. Recently, clinicians have explored new ways to provide satisfactory analgesia while minimizing the pulmonary side effects of the interscalene nerve block. One of these solutions might be to offer the patient a suprascapular nerve block combined to a posterior cord block. Since these blocks are performed lower in the neck or under the clavicle, the phrenic nerve is less likely to be blocked. Thus, fewer respiratory side effects have been reported when using such blocks. This prospective observational study will evaluate the NOL response to surgical stimuli and the opioid requirements intraoperatively in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopies with either a supraclavicular and posterior cord blocks or an interscalene block.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized open label non-inferiority trial. Subject Population: Adults scheduled to undergo elective shoulder arthroscopy Sample Size: 100 patients Study Duration: Starts February 2019 - Ends February 2021 - Interim analysis at 50 patients Study Center: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, CEMTL, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main hypothesis of this study is that the suprascapular block combined with a posterior cord block is not inferior to the interscalene brachial plexus block in terms of intraoperative analgesia. We postulate that intraoperative opioid requirements will not differ significantly in patients who receive either block.

Our secondary objectives will consist in looking at the differences in intraoperative anesthetic consumption, NOL index alterations, postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, arm motor block, diaphragmatic paresis, patient satisfaction and time for readiness to discharge from PACU. We hypothesize that these outcomes will be similar in both groups, with the exception of a potential reduction in arm motor block and diaphragmatic paresis in the combined suprascapular and posterior cord block group.

After having obtained institutional ethics board approval of the study, patients older than 18 years old, scheduled for a first elective shoulder arthroscopy under general anesthesia will be screened in the pre-anesthesia clinic. They will be approached and the whole study procedures will be explained extensively. Interested patients will be invited to sign the consent form (see appendix). Patients will have the right to opt out at any time. The investigators will meet the patients again on the morning of the surgery to address any concerns. After consent, a study number will be allocated to the patient in ascending order.

Two groups will be evaluated:

* Group A: single shot US-guided suprascapular nerve block with 5 mL ropivacaine 0.5%, then single shot US-guided posterior cord block with 10 ml ropivacaine 0.5%.
* Group B: single shot US-guided interscalene brachial plexus block with 15 mL ropivacaine 0.5%.

Tests will be done to evaluate the nerve block-induced loss of sensation to ice prior to entering the operating room (OR). Diaphragmatic excursion will be evaluated using an abdominal curvilinear ultrasound probe, and will be classified as being normal, paradoxical or immobile. Normal motion is caudad movement during inspiration. Paradoxical motion is cephalad movement during inspiration.

Once in the operating room, all routine monitors are connected. Moreover, the PMD TM monitor as well as the BIS® monitor are connected to the anesthesia machine and to the patient. Both study monitors are switched on and will record their respective indices continuously for the duration of the anesthesia. General anesthesia will be induced with propofol (1-2 mg/kg IV; Pharmascience Inc, Canada), remifentanil (1 µg/kg IV bolus; Teva, Canada) and rocuronium (0.6-1 mg/kg IV; Sandoz Canada Inc). A bolus of dexamethasone 4mg IV will be administered after induction of general anesthesia.

Patients will also have received oral acetaminophen 1g and celecoxib 400 mg preoperatively. Intubation with an endotracheal tube is performed once the patient is adequately paralyzed (no responses to the TOF stimulation). All drugs are given according to the adjusted body weight of the patient. This is calculated with Robinson's formula: where TBW is total body weight and IBW is ideal body weight (21-22). Immediately after intubation, anesthesia is maintained with desflurane while targeting a BIS value between 45 and 55, and a remifentanil infusion and boluses are used for a NOL below 25. At the end of anesthesia, when the surgeon starts closing the wounds, an IV bolus of hydromorphone 7 mcg/kg of adjusted body weight is administered. The remifentanil infusion and desflurane are discontinued when dressing starts. Emergence and extubation are done in the OR. All times (start skin closure, start dressing, stop desflurane and remifentanil) will be precisely reported in the CRF.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Surgery Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

2 groups of patients. Randomization into groups SSNP + PCB or ISBPB as per randomization list, for a total of 100 patients.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SSNB + PCB

Single shot US-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) with 5 mL ropivacaine 0.5%, then single shot US-guided posterior cord block (PCB) with 10 ml ropivacaine 0.5%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suprascapular Nerve Block + Posterior Cord Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patient lies supine with the head turned to the contralateral side to the block. Using a linear high-frequency ultrasound probe, the proximal suprascapular nerve is visualized before it turns toward the suprascapular notch. It is blocked using 5mL of ropivicaine 0.5%. The posterior cord is readily visualized when performing an infraclavicular brachial plexus block. It is blocked using 10mL of ropivicaine 0.5%.

ISBPB

Single shot US-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) with 15 mL ropivacaine 0.5%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patient lies supine with the head turned to the contralateral side to the block. Using a linear high-frequency ultrasound probe, the interscalene groove is visualized along with the roots of the brachial plexus. The block is performed with 15mL of ropivacaine 0.5%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suprascapular Nerve Block + Posterior Cord Block

The patient lies supine with the head turned to the contralateral side to the block. Using a linear high-frequency ultrasound probe, the proximal suprascapular nerve is visualized before it turns toward the suprascapular notch. It is blocked using 5mL of ropivicaine 0.5%. The posterior cord is readily visualized when performing an infraclavicular brachial plexus block. It is blocked using 10mL of ropivicaine 0.5%.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

The patient lies supine with the head turned to the contralateral side to the block. Using a linear high-frequency ultrasound probe, the interscalene groove is visualized along with the roots of the brachial plexus. The block is performed with 15mL of ropivacaine 0.5%.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SSNB+PCB ISPB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA status 1,2,3.
* Age 18 years or older
* Elective shoulder arthroscopic surgery under general anesthesia and nerve block performed preoperatively

Exclusion Criteria

* Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) or unstable coronary artery disease.
* Coagulation disorders.
* Patient refusal.
* Anatomical disorders and/or neuropathic disease.
* BMI above 40.
* History of substance abuse.
* Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid.
* History of psychiatric diseases needing treatment.
* Contraindications to nerve block for shoulder surgery.
* Allergy to remifentanil or any drug in the study protocol.
* Failure of nerve block performed in the preoperative block room
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe Richebe

MD, PhD, Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Richebe, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CIUSSS de l'Est de Montreal

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-1743

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.