Aflibercept Plus Micropulse Laser Versus Aflibercept Monotherapy for Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT04014556

Last Updated: 2019-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of adjuvent micropulse laser with Aflibercept injections in the management of treatment naïve centre involving DME, looking at decreased treatment burden and increased efficacy as outcomes.

Methods: This was a prospective, single centre, randomized trial that included 40 eyes (40 patients) with previously untreated centre involved DME. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Aflibercept plus micropulse laser (group A) or Aflibercept monotherapy (group B).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were randomly distributed in a 1:1 ratio between the two studied groups. Group A received 3 monthly injections of Aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL (Eylea; Bayer, Berlin, Germany) as a loading dose, followed one month later by one 577 nm yellow micropulse laser session with monthly PRN Aflibercept injections. Group B received 3 monthly injections of Aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL as a loading dose, followed by monthly PRN Aflibercept injections. Patients in both groups were assessed one month after the end of loading phase; At this point, group A received the micropulse laser session and started PRN Aflibercept injections, while group B started PRN Aflibercept injections without receiving the micropulse laser session. After that, both groups were followed for 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aflibercept plus micropulse laser (group A)

Overall 40 patients were included in the study; they were randomized into either group A (Aflibercept + Micropulse; 20 patients) or group B (Aflibercept monotherapy; 20 patients).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

micropulse laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Micropulse session details:

Mainster focal grid contact lens (×1.05 laser magnification) was used to perform laser. The 577-nm yellow laser (OcuLight SLx, Iridex Corp., Mountain View, California, USA) was used. Fixed treatment parameters were used in all cases: 200-μm spot size, 200-ms exposure duration, 400-mW power, and a 5% duty cycle. Confluent applications with no spacing were administered using 5x5 grid pattern over the entire edematous area including the fovea.

Aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Aflibercept

Aflibercept monotherapy (group B)

Overall 40 patients were included in the study; they were randomized into either group A (Aflibercept + Micropulse; 20 patients) or group B (Aflibercept monotherapy; 20 patients).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Aflibercept

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

micropulse laser

Micropulse session details:

Mainster focal grid contact lens (×1.05 laser magnification) was used to perform laser. The 577-nm yellow laser (OcuLight SLx, Iridex Corp., Mountain View, California, USA) was used. Fixed treatment parameters were used in all cases: 200-μm spot size, 200-ms exposure duration, 400-mW power, and a 5% duty cycle. Confluent applications with no spacing were administered using 5x5 grid pattern over the entire edematous area including the fovea.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Aflibercept

Aflibercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients were older than 18 with the clinical diagnosis of previously untreated centre involved DME documented by fluorescein angiography and central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 300 µm on the spectral-domain OCT Best corrected visual acuity was better than 3/60 with Hb A1C less than 10%.

Exclusion Criteria

* any previous treatment for DME, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular ischemia on fluorescein angiography, epiretinal membrane or tractional maculopathy on OCT, media opacity and any previous intraocular surgery with the exception of uneventful cataract surgery more than 6 months before the beginning of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alexandria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud Abouhussein

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

31181

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

3 Month Outcome of Ziv-aflibercept for DME
NCT02772497 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
4D-150 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT05930561 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2