Home- vs Hospital-based Care of Anti-VEGF Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema: Non-inferiority RCT

NCT ID: NCT06610747

Last Updated: 2025-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-28

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of central visual loss in diabetic patients and a global public health burden around the world. Most patients with DME and vision loss require pharmacological inhibition using anti-VEGF agents with multiple monitoring visits that require both visual acuity testing and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine if re-treatment is warranted as well as the recommended time interval to the next follow-up visit. However, this treatment regimen often requires monthly or every other month clinic visits, which places a substantial burden on ophthalmic clinics and patients.

Recently, portable self-administered Home OCT devices have been developed that allow for home-based OCT scanning of retinal diseases, e.g., DME, although these devices do not include visual acuity determination. The investigators previously proposed to deliver Home OCT devices and Home visual acuity tester to patients\' homes to complete routine monitoring visits at home. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this novel monitoring regimen for DME patients, specifically whether its use could reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes.

This study aims to provide evidence to support use of a novel monitoring regimen for DME patients that could substantially reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This visit and treatment burden is associated with poorer DME treatment outcomes in the clinical practice (real world) setting compared with outcomes in clinical trials. Studies have shown that less than half of DME patients remain compliant with their anti-VEGF treatment schedules in the clinical practice setting, with many experiencing worse visual acuity levels after missed appointments. Potential reasons for suboptimal outcomes include under-treatment when otherwise indicated, missed visits when treatment should be applied, absence of protocol refractions and protocol visual acuity measurements which may guide treatment but be difficult to obtain in clinic, and anti-VEGF costs. Addressing these challenges could benefit from a novel approach of monitoring patients remotely so that visits only would be needed when treatment was warranted based on changes in best corrected visual acuity or OCT central subfield thickness measurements, but only if this approach does not sacrifice visual acuity outcomes. In particular, reducing the frequency of clinic visits might improve patient compliance and potentially improve treatment outcomes.

To address these challenges, new devices, which currently are not readily available around the world, and new agents or anti-VEGF delivery devices have been developed to try to reduce the burden of injections without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes. However, most of these new agents that could be given q8 or q12 or q16 weeks in some study participants provided non-inferior visual acuity outcomes only in the setting of protocols that included q4week clinic assessments. Potentially, this frequent monitoring may be needed to avoid sacrificing visual acuity outcomes when reducing the number of injections. Furthermore, new delivery devices have been fraught with safety concerns.

Recently, portable self-administered Home OCT devices have been developed that allow for home-based OCT scanning of retinal diseases, e.g., DME, nAMD, or CNV associated with pathologic myopia. The image quality and accuracy of retinal thickness measurements obtained from some of these devices have been validated through comparison with clinic- or hospital-based OCTs, although evaluation of these devices has not included home monitoring of visual acuity, nor determined if their use results in non-inferior visual acuity outcomes.

In this study, the investigators will conduct a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial to determine if the mean change in visual acuity (primary outcome) is non-inferior with the home monitoring of visual acuity and OCT compared with hospital/clinic-based care among DME participants receiving anti-VEGF therapy, and if it is non-inferior, to determine if the home care model can reduce hospital/clinic visits over 96 weeks (principal secondary outcome).

Participants will receive five q4week loading anti-VEGF injections after enrollment. Only those participants who receive loading injections as planned will be assigned randomly to one of two groups and undergo as needed (pro-re-nata, PRN) treatments with injections of anti-VEGF:

1. Home-based Care Group
2. Standard Hospital/clinic-based Care Group

Re-injections of anti-VEGF (PRN), laser, surgery or other procedures will be performed per protocol for participants from both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Home-based care group

Home-based monitoring with home visual acuity tester and home OCT:

For participants in the home-based care group, home service appointments will be scheduled during the 'pro re nada' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will receive a home self-administered visual acuity tester and a self-administered Home OCT to use at home every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home-based Care Monitoring

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For participants in the home-based care group, home service appointments will be scheduled during the 'pro re nada' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will receive a home self-administered visual acuity tester and a self-administered Home OCT to use at home every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol. The results of the visual acuity and OCT measurements will be transmitted to the clinician at the hospital. An online discussion between the clinician and the participant will be held. Reports will be sent to the participant after each visit. In the event that the study coordinator is unable to contact the participant, a total of three phone call attempts will be made. Any failure to keep an appointment will be communicated to the participant.

Aflibercept 2Mg/0.05Ml Inj,Oph

Intervention Type DRUG

Each eye will receive three to five q4week loading anti-VEGF injections of aflibercept (2-mg, EYLEA®) after enrollment to complete the initial loading phase of 5 doses. Each eye will then be treated according to the PRN treatment protocol described in the study protocol.

Laser Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) may be administered if deemed necessary by the investigator, typically for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). However, individuals are not eligible for this study if it is expected that they will require PRP within 6 months at the time of enrollment. In general, PRP should not be given to study participants with less than high risk PDR. For previously untreated eyes exhibiting PDR with high-risk characteristics, PRP should be administered promptly, while it can be considered, although generally not recommended, for persons with non-high-risk PDR or severe non-PDR who are being monitored monthly in this protocol. Focal/grid laser typically should be withheld until sometime after the final visit.

Standard Hospital/clinic-based care group

Standard hospital/clinic-based visual acuity and OCT monitoring:

For participants in the standard Hospital/clinic-based group, hospital service appointments will be scheduled during the 'pro re nada' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for hospital-based visual acuity examinations and standard OCT measurements every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aflibercept 2Mg/0.05Ml Inj,Oph

Intervention Type DRUG

Each eye will receive three to five q4week loading anti-VEGF injections of aflibercept (2-mg, EYLEA®) after enrollment to complete the initial loading phase of 5 doses. Each eye will then be treated according to the PRN treatment protocol described in the study protocol.

Laser Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) may be administered if deemed necessary by the investigator, typically for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). However, individuals are not eligible for this study if it is expected that they will require PRP within 6 months at the time of enrollment. In general, PRP should not be given to study participants with less than high risk PDR. For previously untreated eyes exhibiting PDR with high-risk characteristics, PRP should be administered promptly, while it can be considered, although generally not recommended, for persons with non-high-risk PDR or severe non-PDR who are being monitored monthly in this protocol. Focal/grid laser typically should be withheld until sometime after the final visit.

Standard Hospital/clinic-based Care Monitoring

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For participants in the standard Hospital/clinic-based group, hospital service appointments will be scheduled during the \'pro re nada\' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for hospital-based visual acuity examinations and standard OCT measurements every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol. A discussion between the clinician and the participant will be held in clinic. Reports will be sent to the participant after each visit. In the event that the study coordinator is unable to contact the participant, a total of three phone call attempts will be made. Any failure to keep an appointment will be communicated to the participant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home-based Care Monitoring

For participants in the home-based care group, home service appointments will be scheduled during the 'pro re nada' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will receive a home self-administered visual acuity tester and a self-administered Home OCT to use at home every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol. The results of the visual acuity and OCT measurements will be transmitted to the clinician at the hospital. An online discussion between the clinician and the participant will be held. Reports will be sent to the participant after each visit. In the event that the study coordinator is unable to contact the participant, a total of three phone call attempts will be made. Any failure to keep an appointment will be communicated to the participant.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Aflibercept 2Mg/0.05Ml Inj,Oph

Each eye will receive three to five q4week loading anti-VEGF injections of aflibercept (2-mg, EYLEA®) after enrollment to complete the initial loading phase of 5 doses. Each eye will then be treated according to the PRN treatment protocol described in the study protocol.

Intervention Type DRUG

Laser Treatment

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) may be administered if deemed necessary by the investigator, typically for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). However, individuals are not eligible for this study if it is expected that they will require PRP within 6 months at the time of enrollment. In general, PRP should not be given to study participants with less than high risk PDR. For previously untreated eyes exhibiting PDR with high-risk characteristics, PRP should be administered promptly, while it can be considered, although generally not recommended, for persons with non-high-risk PDR or severe non-PDR who are being monitored monthly in this protocol. Focal/grid laser typically should be withheld until sometime after the final visit.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Hospital/clinic-based Care Monitoring

For participants in the standard Hospital/clinic-based group, hospital service appointments will be scheduled during the \'pro re nada\' (PRN) treatment phase. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for hospital-based visual acuity examinations and standard OCT measurements every 4 weeks after the 5th injection through 48 weeks, and then as needed per the DME treatment regimen protocol provided in the protocol. A discussion between the clinician and the participant will be held in clinic. Reports will be sent to the participant after each visit. In the event that the study coordinator is unable to contact the participant, a total of three phone call attempts will be made. Any failure to keep an appointment will be communicated to the participant.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aflibercept 2-mg/0.05mL intravitreal ophthalmic injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age of 18 years or older;
* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes or current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
* Travel time from home to the hospital/clinic within a 2-hour driving distance
* At least one eye meets the study eye criteria listed in Section 2.4
* Ability and willingness to operate the self-administrated visual acuity tester and Home OCT device by themselves or with the help of family after training
* Ability and willingness to provide informed consent


* If the baseline visual acuity letter score in both eyes is 50 (20/100) or better, the better-seeing eye is the eye with better baseline visual acuity (better than that of the fellow eye by 5 letters or more), and the worse-seeing eye is the eye with worse baseline visual acuity (worse than that of the fellow eye by 5 letters or more); if the baseline visual acuity of one eye is within 4 letters of that of the fellow eye, the two eyes are the same and neither eye is the better-seeing eye.
* If the baseline visual acuity letter score in both eyes is \< 50 (20/100), the better-seeing eye is the eye with better baseline visual acuity (better than that of the fellow eye by 10 letters or more), and the worse-seeing eye is the eye with worse baseline visual acuity (worse than that of the fellow eye by 10 letters or more); if the baseline visual acuity of study eye is within 9 letters of that of the fellow eye, the two eyes are the same and neither eye is the better-seeing eye.

The eligibility criteria for a study eye are as follows:


* Central-involved DME (central subfield thickness on OCT defined on Heidelberg Spectralis OCT 320 μm or more in men and 305 μm or more in women, or Zeiss Cirrus OCT 305 μm or more in men and 290 μm or more in women, or the equivalent on spectral-domain OCT based on gender specific cutoffs)
* Best corrected visual acuity letter score ≤ 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and ≥ 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within seven days of inclusion
* Received no treatment for DME before, or received no anti-VEGF injection for DME within the past 3 months; however, if there is a history of anti-VEGF injections, \<=1 injection in the past year and \<=3 injections over the study participant's lifetime); or, \<=2 monthly injections within the past 3 months and \<=3 injections over the past year, and \<=6 injections over the study participant's lifetime.
* Sufficient media clarity, pupillary dilation, and individual cooperation to allow for adequate fundus photographs and adequate OCT

Exclusion Criteria

* Conditions that would preclude participation in the study, such as unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and glycemic control as determined by the investigators
* History of systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months before randomization. These drugs should not be used during the study;
* In an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied
* Blood pressure \&amp;gt; 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110. If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, then the individual may be eligible
* History of myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months before enrollment
* For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 2 years. Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy, and the investigator will determine when a pregnancy test is needed
* Currently participating in other clinical trials
* The individual who might move out to an area beyond 2-hour driving distance during the first 12 months of the study

Study eye-level Criteria:


The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the non-study eye):

* Macular edema due to reasons other than diabetes
* Any history of prior laser, other surgical or corticosteroid treatment for DME (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal corticosteroids or peribulbar corticosteroids) within the prior 12 months
* History of intravitreal anti-VEGF for an ocular condition other than DME (e.g., choroidal neovascularization, central retinal vein occlusion, PDR) within the prior 6 months or anticipated need in the next 6 months
* Coexisting ocular diseases that might alter visual acuity during the course of the study, such as a retinal vein or artery occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory diseases, neovascular glaucoma, etc.
* A substantial cataract that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more. This means that the cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if the eye were otherwise normal
* History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckling, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization
* Uncontrolled glaucoma
* Severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dongguan Guangming Ophthalmic Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second People's Hospital of Foshan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yizhi Liu, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dongguan Guangming Ophthalmic Hospital

Dongguan, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

The Second Peoples Hospital of Foshan

Foshan, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yingfeng Zheng, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+8613922286455

Zitian Liu, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Liangqi Feng, MD

Role: primary

+18925886240

Xiao Hu, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+8613922286455

Yingfeng Zheng, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+8613922286455

Zitian Liu, MD, PhD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reddy RK, Pieramici DJ, Gune S, Ghanekar A, Lu N, Quezada-Ruiz C, Baumal CR. Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Nonperfusion in RIDE and RISE. Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1568-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29752001 (View on PubMed)

Jhaveri CD, Glassman AR, Ferris FL 3rd, Liu D, Maguire MG, Allen JB, Baker CW, Browning D, Cunningham MA, Friedman SM, Jampol LM, Marcus DM, Martin DF, Preston CM, Stockdale CR, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Aflibercept Monotherapy or Bevacizumab First for Diabetic Macular Edema. N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 25;387(8):692-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204225. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35833805 (View on PubMed)

Heier JS, Korobelnik JF, Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, Midena E, Boyer DS, Terasaki H, Kaiser PK, Marcus DM, Nguyen QD, Jaffe GJ, Slakter JS, Simader C, Soo Y, Schmelter T, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Zeitz O, Metzig C, Holz FG. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2376-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27651226 (View on PubMed)

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Arnold-Bush B, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25692915 (View on PubMed)

Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Brucker AJ, Ferris FL, Hampton GR, Jhaveri C, Melia M, Beck RW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26935357 (View on PubMed)

Glassman AR, Wells JA 3rd, Josic K, Maguire MG, Antoszyk AN, Baker C, Beaulieu WT, Elman MJ, Jampol LM, Sun JK. Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study). Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32402554 (View on PubMed)

Kim JE, Tomkins-Netzer O, Elman MJ, Lally DR, Goldstein M, Goldenberg D, Shulman S, Benyamini G, Loewenstein A. Evaluation of a self-imaging SD-OCT system designed for remote home monitoring. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 10;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02458-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35689210 (View on PubMed)

Liu Z, Huang W, Wang Z, Jin L, Congdon N, Zheng Y, Chen S, Liu Y. Evaluation of a self-imaging OCT for remote diagnosis and monitoring of retinal diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 23;108(8):1154-1160. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37903558 (View on PubMed)

Maguire MG, Liu D, Bressler SB, Friedman SM, Melia M, Stockdale CR, Glassman AR, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Lapses in Care Among Patients Assigned to Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;139(12):1266-1273. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34673898 (View on PubMed)

Greco G, Pistilli M, Asbell PA, Maguire MG; Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study Research Group. Association of Severity of Dry Eye Disease with Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study. Ophthalmology. 2021 Jun;128(6):850-856. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.015. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33068617 (View on PubMed)

Bressler NM, Chang TS, Suner IJ, Fine JT, Dolan CM, Ward J, Ianchulev T; MARINA and ANCHOR Research Groups. Vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment by better- or worse-seeing eye: clinical trial results from MARINA and ANCHOR. Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):747-56.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.002. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20189654 (View on PubMed)

Elman MJ, Ayala A, Bressler NM, Browning D, Flaxel CJ, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Stone TW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25439614 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024KYPJ072

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.