Neostigmine for Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

NCT ID: NCT04000100

Last Updated: 2019-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-15

Study Completion Date

2019-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients were randomly allocated into Two equal study groups each contain (40) patients : Patients in Group A received supraclavicular block using 25mL of 0. 5% bupivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and patients in Group B received 25 mL 0. 5% bupivacaine and 1 mL neostigmine (0.5 mg).

The investigators found that neostigmine when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block has advantage over bupivacaine alone especially in the quality of sensory block and provide safe and effective post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing forearm surgeries

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients were assessed with regards to:

Hemodynamics (heart rate, Bp) and oxygen saturation were recorded preoperatively just before the block as a baseline value, immediately after the block 5, 20, 30,40,45 , 60 minutes during the operative time and 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12 hours after end of operation.

Onset time of sensory block, Onset time of motor block, Duration of sensory block, and Duration of motor block.

Pain assessment using a scoring system based on the visual analogue pain scale(VAS) measured at the following time intervals 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 post operatively, time to first analgesic requirement (in hours) and total analgesic consumption was monitored in the two groups for 24 hours in ward.

The incidence of adverse effects whether related to the drugs used in the technique or related to the technique itself were recorded.

The results of this study found that demographic (age, sex, weight and ASA classification and surgical duration were statistically insignificant between the two groups.

Hemodynamics (HR and Bp) were statistically significant between the groups .They were lower in Neostigmine groups.

As regard onset of sensory and motor block were clinically and significantly earlier in group B than group A ( p \< 0,05) and the same for duration of sensory and motor block were clinically and significantly longer in group B than in group A ( P \< 0,05 ). Regarding Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), while comparing the two groups, the differences were significant at 9 and 12 hours after surgery for the favor of the neostigmine groups . The time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in group B than group A.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

This group received supraclavicular block using 25mL of 0. 5% bupivacaine and 1 mL normal saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

ultrasound- guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient lie down supine with head turned 45 degrees to the contralateral side and ipsilateral arm adducted gently by the assistant and the shoulder kept down with flexed elbow.

After sterile preparation of the skin and the ultrasound probe (12 MHz probe) were used, the brachial plexus was visualized by placing the transducer in the sagittal plane in the supraclavicular fossa behind the middle-third of the clavicle. Two distinct appearances of the brachial plexus was seen at the supraclavicular region, it either appeared as 3 hypoechoic circles with hyperechoic outer rings or as a grape like cluster of 5 to 6 hypoechoic circles, located lateral and superior to the subclavian artery between the anterior and middle scalene muscles at the lower cervical region figure

Neostigmine group

This group received 25 mL 0. 5% bupivacaine and 1 mL neostigmine (0.5 mg)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ultrasound- guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient lie down supine with head turned 45 degrees to the contralateral side and ipsilateral arm adducted gently by the assistant and the shoulder kept down with flexed elbow.

After sterile preparation of the skin and the ultrasound probe (12 MHz probe) were used, the brachial plexus was visualized by placing the transducer in the sagittal plane in the supraclavicular fossa behind the middle-third of the clavicle. Two distinct appearances of the brachial plexus was seen at the supraclavicular region, it either appeared as 3 hypoechoic circles with hyperechoic outer rings or as a grape like cluster of 5 to 6 hypoechoic circles, located lateral and superior to the subclavian artery between the anterior and middle scalene muscles at the lower cervical region figure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultrasound- guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

Patient lie down supine with head turned 45 degrees to the contralateral side and ipsilateral arm adducted gently by the assistant and the shoulder kept down with flexed elbow.

After sterile preparation of the skin and the ultrasound probe (12 MHz probe) were used, the brachial plexus was visualized by placing the transducer in the sagittal plane in the supraclavicular fossa behind the middle-third of the clavicle. Two distinct appearances of the brachial plexus was seen at the supraclavicular region, it either appeared as 3 hypoechoic circles with hyperechoic outer rings or as a grape like cluster of 5 to 6 hypoechoic circles, located lateral and superior to the subclavian artery between the anterior and middle scalene muscles at the lower cervical region figure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA ( I-II)
2. Age: from ≥18 years
3. Sex: male or female
4. type of operation : Forearm Orthopedic surgeries
5. Type of anaesthesia : supraclavicular brachial plexus block
6. Duration of operation : 60-90 min

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient refusal for the procedure
2. Any bleeding tendency
3. Neurological deficits involving brachial plexus
4. Patients with allergy to local anesthetics
5. Local infection at the site of injection
6. Patients on any sedatives or antipsychotics
7. Body mass index \>35.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ABEER HASSANIN

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ABEER HASSANIN

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ebrahim Abbas, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

faculty of medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minya university hospital

Minya, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

72-7-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Parasagittal Vs Cornerpocket Approaches
NCT06352333 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA