Effectiveness of Adding Hyaluronidase to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT ID: NCT05083663
Last Updated: 2021-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-10
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methodology prospective, randomized and double-blind study conducted at Sohag University Hospital. A total of 40 adults scheduled for upper limb surgery, ASA I or II were randomly assigned into two groups (n=20). Group I received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IUin 1 ml. Group II received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml. Both groups will be compared for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia and complications.
Results The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in hyaluronidase group than control group. Significant difference could not be detected in either duration of the sensory or motor block between the two groups.
Conclusion The use of hyaluronidase as an additive to bupivacaine fastens the onset of sensory and motor block of the brachial plexus in supraclavicular approach without affecting the duration of the block.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sealed envelopes technique was used to randomly assign patients to both study groups; Group I; received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IU in 1 ml.
Group II; received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml. After arriving to the operative theater basic monitoring was applied and intravenous line was inserted. Midazolam 2mg and Fentanyl 50 mcg was administered intravenously to all participants 15 minutes before the procedure. Anesthesiologist who carried out the block and recorded the study measurements was blinded to the treatment groups.
The participants were in supine position with the head rotated to the opposite side and neck extended, 7 to 12 MHz linear ultrasound probe (SonoScape A5, SonoScape Co., Ltd., China) was placed above the clavicle to identify distal trunks or proximal divisions of the brachial plexus lateral and cephalad to the subclavian artery above the first rib. After ultrasound pre-scan and local infiltration with 3ml lidocaine 2%, 100 mm, 20 gauge nerve-stimulating needle (Locoplex®, VYGON, FRANCE) was inserted under real time ultrasound guided technique in line approach and advanced until reaching the brachial plexus sheath the needle was repositioned to allow local anesthetic spread around all trunks or divisions. Injection was stopped if an increased resistance to injection experienced or parathesia to avoid intra neural injection. All participants were transferred to post-anesthesia care unit postoperatively to be observed for the following measurements:
The primary measurement:
1. Onset of complete sensory block (time from injection to complete sensory block to pin prick).
2. Onset of complete motor block (time from injection to complete motor block).
Secondary measurements:
1. Duration of analgesia defined as time from injection to first analgesia request.
2. Duration of sensory block (time between injection and complete recovery of sensation)
3. Duration of motor block (time between injection and complete recovery of motor power)
4. Side effects and complications (hypotension, sedation, nausea vomiting, dry mouth, hematoma or pneumothorax, neuropathy) Participants were allowed to receive analgesia as ketorolac 30 mg intramuscularly as a rescue analgesia if VAS \> 4.
Statistical analysis:
After performing the power analysis of the study , it is decided that each group should contain at least a minimum of 18 cases (90% power and 0.05%alpha error).Considering possible data loss due to technical reasons, each group was decided to be 20 patients.
Recorded data were subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of demographic and hemodynamic data while unpaired t-test was applied for onset time and duration of sensory and motor blocks and was reconfirmed with the Wilcoxon W and Mann-Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was defined by P-value \< 0.05. chi-square/Fischer's exact test was used for analysis of adverse effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I
received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IU in 1 ml.
Hyaluronidase
using hyaluronidase as an additive to bupivacaine
Group II
received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hyaluronidase
using hyaluronidase as an additive to bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II
* Scheduled for elective surgery of the upper extremities
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe renal or hepatic disease
* Pulmonary, cardiac disease
* Neurologic, psychiatric disease
* Neuromuscular disease
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Morbid obesity
* Coagulation disorders as well
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hitham Mohammed Aly Elsayed
lecturer of anesthesia and surgical ICU
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mohammed A Mahroos, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-21.09.04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id