Joint Position Sense in Individuals With Anterior Knee Pain
NCT ID: NCT03998241
Last Updated: 2019-06-26
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
25 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2017-02-01
Study Completion Date
2017-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Introduction Anterior knee pain (AKP) commonly affects physically active as well as sedentary individuals and the aetiology remains unknown. Altered joint position sense (JPS) impacts accurate motor action and knee joint stability. It is unclear whether people with AKP have altered JPS. The aim of this study was to investigate the JPS of individuals with AKP.
Methods A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to measure JPS in twenty-five participants with unilateral or bilateral AKP. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to assess JPS by means of active joint position sense testing during single leg squat and active knee extension in sitting. Target angles were self-determined based on each participant's capabilities. The absolute error (AE) was used as the main outcome measure. Impaired JPS was classified as an AE equal to or greater than five degrees.
Methods A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to measure JPS in twenty-five participants with unilateral or bilateral AKP. The Vicon 3D motion analysis system was used to assess JPS by means of active joint position sense testing during single leg squat and active knee extension in sitting. Target angles were self-determined based on each participant's capabilities. The absolute error (AE) was used as the main outcome measure. Impaired JPS was classified as an AE equal to or greater than five degrees.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Foot Positions Affect Knee and Ankle Proprioception, Balance, Vertical Jump, and Muscle Activity in Individuals With Flexible and Rigid Flatfoot and Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT05899855
Flatfoot
UNKNOWN
Radiological and Clinical Measures as Predictors of Dynamic Postural Control Deficits in Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT07051018
Chronic Ankle Instability, CAI
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Association Between Ankle Dorsiflexion and Frontal Projection Angle in PFPS
NCT03897569
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
COMPLETED
Evaluation of Proprioceptive Abilities While Wearing an Elastic Orthosis in Patients With Proprioceptive Knee Deficits
NCT05435040
Proprioceptive Disorders
COMPLETED
NA
Relationship of Dynamic Knee Valgus With Foot Posture, Pain, and Balance in Chronic Ankle Instability.
NCT07121725
Chronic Ankle Instability
COMPLETED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research Design CAF Human motion analysis Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University. Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University under reference number S16/10/197. This study was conducted as part of a master's thesis project (Rhode 2018).
Sampling and Recruitment Sample recruitment was aimed to attract individuals with AKP from different socio-economic backgrounds, sporting codes and areas. Letters of invitation were sent to various universities, sports clinics, physiotherapy practices and sporting clubs.
Study Procedure Measurement Tools Vicon 3D motion analysis system The eight-camera Vicon T-20-series motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK) with Nexus 1.7 software was used to assess joint position sense (JPS). The Vicon has demonstrated high accuracy and reliability and has been shown to have less than a 1.5-degree error (Ehara et al 1997). Retro-reflective markers with a diameter of 9.5mm were used. Dynamic calibration was performed according to standard laboratory protocol, and the Vicon T-wand was placed on a 3D Bertec force plate (Bertec Corporation Ltd.), which is synchronized with the Vicon motion analysis system.
H-Frame An H-frame was constructed based on a study by Clark et al (2016). The function of the H-frame was that of a range of motion (ROM) guide when establishing the target angle (TA) for participants during the test trial. The H-frame was positioned so that the rubber band (crossbar) makes contact with the distal part of the patella during single leg squat (SLS) and that the crossbar touches the skin overlying the anterior ankle joint line during active knee extension (AKE). The H-frame was removed during the test procedure.
Kujala/anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) questionnaire The AKPS is a 13-item knee functional questionnaire. This scale is scored out of 100, with a higher score indicating less disability. The AKPS demonstrated high reliability and responsiveness in a population of patients with AKP (Watson et al 2005).
Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) This VAS scale is a well-known outcome measure to evaluate levels/intensity of pain (Crossley et al 2016). The VAS is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The VAS demonstrates good reliability and responsiveness among a population of patients with AKP (Green et al 2014).
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) questionnaire The LEFS consists of 20 items that measure the ability to perform various functional activities and activities of daily life. The LEFS is scored out of a maximum score of 80. The LEFS demonstrates high reliability and responsiveness in the population of patients with AKP (Watson et al 2005).
Criteria for positive and negative knee joint position sense The main outcome measurements for knee JPS testing was absolute error (AE). AE refers to the difference between the test or target angle and the reproduced angle. Absolute error represents accuracy without directional bias. For the purpose of this study, abnormal JPS was defined as an AE equal or greater than five degrees. This criterion was based on published research by Relph and Callaghan (2016) and Clark et al (2016) using healthy pain free participants. The mean AE from five trails for each test was used for statistical analysis (Selfe et al 2006).
Testing Procedures Initial screening To verify that participants met the inclusion criteria they completed a screening questionnaire via email. Prior to JPS testing, participants completed the AKP scale questionnaire (AKPS) and the LEFS questionnaire. A data collection form was used to collect participant personal details and variables including age, gender, body length, episodes and duration of AKP, area of symptoms, type of treatment received for AKP and sport participation.
Physical examination and diagnosis The diagnostic checklist was completed, and the physical examination was performed to confirm a diagnosis of AKP and to exclude other knee pathologies prior to testing. The physical examination (P/E) was conducted by the primary researcher (CR), who is an experienced physiotherapist. Additionally, anthropometrics (weight, BMI, leg length) were measured for each participant. Data were captured as part of participant demographics to describe this population group/participants.
Preparation for Vicon testing Participants were dressed in short pants, were barefoot, with clean shaven legs with no lotion on legs to ensure effective marker placement. Thirty retro-reflective markers were placed on bony landmarks according to lower limb Plug-in Gait model (Clark et al 2016). Additional pelvic markers, a sacral wand, two extra shin markers and extra anterior and posterior thigh markers where added, to ensure joint position sense accuracy. The primary researcher (CR) performed the marker placement assisted by a research assistant. Reflective markers were placed in the standing position in preparation for SLS and re-applied with the participant in the seated position to ensure accurate positioning of markers placements for active knee extension. A static and dynamic calibration were performed in both test positions.
Pain measurement During the test trials the participants were asked to verbally indicate the severity of their anterior knee pain using the VAS pain scale. Pain severity was measured at the start and end of proprioceptive testing.
Proprioceptive Testing All participants were familiarized with the proprioceptive test procedure by means of explanation, demonstration and a practice opportunity. The participants were asked to resume the test position i.e. (i) standing or (ii) sitting. The target angle was determined by each participant according to his/her capabilities and comfort level, i.e. the target angle was unique to each participant.
Single leg squat (SLS) Starting position For the SLS the participant supported one hands on a chair for balance. The participant was standing on the tested leg, while the other leg was slightly flexed at the hip and knee in a position that was comfortable for the participant.
Instructions to participant The participant was asked to do a SLS and stop in the mid-range. The participant was asked to briefly hold this mid-range angle to position the H-frame indicating this angle as the target angle (TA).
Test trial The participant was cued to squat down till they felt the cross bar of the H-frame. The participant was instructed to hold the SLS for five seconds to establish and familiarize themselves with the target angle (TA). The test trial was repeated five times.
Test procedure The participant was blindfolded, and the H-frame was removed. The participant was instructed to perform a SLS, and to indicate when they had reached the TA by shouting STOP. This position indicated the relative error (RE) and was maintained for five seconds to record the data. Testing was repeated five times. This number of repetitions has been recommended for JPS testing in previous research (Selfe et al 2006). SLS was repeated on the knees without AKP for comparison.
Sitting: active knee extension (AKE) Starting position The participant was seated on an 800mm high bar stool, with both feet supported. Each participant was positioned with the popliteal fossa approximately 5cm from the edge of the chair. The participant's arms were crossed over their chests comfortably to avoid obstruction of the pelvic markers.
Instructions to participants The participant actively extended the knee through the range of 90 degrees knee flexion to 0 degrees knee extension; thereafter they had to stop in the mid-range position. The participant was asked to briefly hold this mid-range angle to position the H-frame indicating this position as the TA. The participant was verbally cued to resume the starting position.
Test trial The participant actively extended the knee from the starting position of 90 degrees knee flexion to the TA. The participants were verbally cued to hold this position for five seconds to establish the TA. Thereafter the participant was asked to return to the starting position of the knee in 90 degrees flexion. The test trail was repeated five times.
Testing The H-frame was removed at the commencement of AKE testing. The participant was asked to repeat AKE, indicating when the TA had been reached, by shouting STOP. This position indicated the relative error (RE) and the participants maintained this position for five seconds. Testing was repeated five times. The AKE was repeated on the knees without AKP for comparison.
Statistical Analyses All descriptive data (demographic information, functional and pain scales) were analyzed using descriptive statistics to indicate central tendencies in data (means and standard deviations). A non-pragmatic test approach was adopted by illustrating the ranges. Data was captured through the Vicon Nexus 3D motion analyses system. Chi-square calculations was performed to determine a significant difference in JPS between the knees with AKP and the knees without AKP during single leg stance and active knee extension.
Sampling and Recruitment Sample recruitment was aimed to attract individuals with AKP from different socio-economic backgrounds, sporting codes and areas. Letters of invitation were sent to various universities, sports clinics, physiotherapy practices and sporting clubs.
Study Procedure Measurement Tools Vicon 3D motion analysis system The eight-camera Vicon T-20-series motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Oxford, UK) with Nexus 1.7 software was used to assess joint position sense (JPS). The Vicon has demonstrated high accuracy and reliability and has been shown to have less than a 1.5-degree error (Ehara et al 1997). Retro-reflective markers with a diameter of 9.5mm were used. Dynamic calibration was performed according to standard laboratory protocol, and the Vicon T-wand was placed on a 3D Bertec force plate (Bertec Corporation Ltd.), which is synchronized with the Vicon motion analysis system.
H-Frame An H-frame was constructed based on a study by Clark et al (2016). The function of the H-frame was that of a range of motion (ROM) guide when establishing the target angle (TA) for participants during the test trial. The H-frame was positioned so that the rubber band (crossbar) makes contact with the distal part of the patella during single leg squat (SLS) and that the crossbar touches the skin overlying the anterior ankle joint line during active knee extension (AKE). The H-frame was removed during the test procedure.
Kujala/anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) questionnaire The AKPS is a 13-item knee functional questionnaire. This scale is scored out of 100, with a higher score indicating less disability. The AKPS demonstrated high reliability and responsiveness in a population of patients with AKP (Watson et al 2005).
Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) This VAS scale is a well-known outcome measure to evaluate levels/intensity of pain (Crossley et al 2016). The VAS is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The VAS demonstrates good reliability and responsiveness among a population of patients with AKP (Green et al 2014).
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) questionnaire The LEFS consists of 20 items that measure the ability to perform various functional activities and activities of daily life. The LEFS is scored out of a maximum score of 80. The LEFS demonstrates high reliability and responsiveness in the population of patients with AKP (Watson et al 2005).
Criteria for positive and negative knee joint position sense The main outcome measurements for knee JPS testing was absolute error (AE). AE refers to the difference between the test or target angle and the reproduced angle. Absolute error represents accuracy without directional bias. For the purpose of this study, abnormal JPS was defined as an AE equal or greater than five degrees. This criterion was based on published research by Relph and Callaghan (2016) and Clark et al (2016) using healthy pain free participants. The mean AE from five trails for each test was used for statistical analysis (Selfe et al 2006).
Testing Procedures Initial screening To verify that participants met the inclusion criteria they completed a screening questionnaire via email. Prior to JPS testing, participants completed the AKP scale questionnaire (AKPS) and the LEFS questionnaire. A data collection form was used to collect participant personal details and variables including age, gender, body length, episodes and duration of AKP, area of symptoms, type of treatment received for AKP and sport participation.
Physical examination and diagnosis The diagnostic checklist was completed, and the physical examination was performed to confirm a diagnosis of AKP and to exclude other knee pathologies prior to testing. The physical examination (P/E) was conducted by the primary researcher (CR), who is an experienced physiotherapist. Additionally, anthropometrics (weight, BMI, leg length) were measured for each participant. Data were captured as part of participant demographics to describe this population group/participants.
Preparation for Vicon testing Participants were dressed in short pants, were barefoot, with clean shaven legs with no lotion on legs to ensure effective marker placement. Thirty retro-reflective markers were placed on bony landmarks according to lower limb Plug-in Gait model (Clark et al 2016). Additional pelvic markers, a sacral wand, two extra shin markers and extra anterior and posterior thigh markers where added, to ensure joint position sense accuracy. The primary researcher (CR) performed the marker placement assisted by a research assistant. Reflective markers were placed in the standing position in preparation for SLS and re-applied with the participant in the seated position to ensure accurate positioning of markers placements for active knee extension. A static and dynamic calibration were performed in both test positions.
Pain measurement During the test trials the participants were asked to verbally indicate the severity of their anterior knee pain using the VAS pain scale. Pain severity was measured at the start and end of proprioceptive testing.
Proprioceptive Testing All participants were familiarized with the proprioceptive test procedure by means of explanation, demonstration and a practice opportunity. The participants were asked to resume the test position i.e. (i) standing or (ii) sitting. The target angle was determined by each participant according to his/her capabilities and comfort level, i.e. the target angle was unique to each participant.
Single leg squat (SLS) Starting position For the SLS the participant supported one hands on a chair for balance. The participant was standing on the tested leg, while the other leg was slightly flexed at the hip and knee in a position that was comfortable for the participant.
Instructions to participant The participant was asked to do a SLS and stop in the mid-range. The participant was asked to briefly hold this mid-range angle to position the H-frame indicating this angle as the target angle (TA).
Test trial The participant was cued to squat down till they felt the cross bar of the H-frame. The participant was instructed to hold the SLS for five seconds to establish and familiarize themselves with the target angle (TA). The test trial was repeated five times.
Test procedure The participant was blindfolded, and the H-frame was removed. The participant was instructed to perform a SLS, and to indicate when they had reached the TA by shouting STOP. This position indicated the relative error (RE) and was maintained for five seconds to record the data. Testing was repeated five times. This number of repetitions has been recommended for JPS testing in previous research (Selfe et al 2006). SLS was repeated on the knees without AKP for comparison.
Sitting: active knee extension (AKE) Starting position The participant was seated on an 800mm high bar stool, with both feet supported. Each participant was positioned with the popliteal fossa approximately 5cm from the edge of the chair. The participant's arms were crossed over their chests comfortably to avoid obstruction of the pelvic markers.
Instructions to participants The participant actively extended the knee through the range of 90 degrees knee flexion to 0 degrees knee extension; thereafter they had to stop in the mid-range position. The participant was asked to briefly hold this mid-range angle to position the H-frame indicating this position as the TA. The participant was verbally cued to resume the starting position.
Test trial The participant actively extended the knee from the starting position of 90 degrees knee flexion to the TA. The participants were verbally cued to hold this position for five seconds to establish the TA. Thereafter the participant was asked to return to the starting position of the knee in 90 degrees flexion. The test trail was repeated five times.
Testing The H-frame was removed at the commencement of AKE testing. The participant was asked to repeat AKE, indicating when the TA had been reached, by shouting STOP. This position indicated the relative error (RE) and the participants maintained this position for five seconds. Testing was repeated five times. The AKE was repeated on the knees without AKP for comparison.
Statistical Analyses All descriptive data (demographic information, functional and pain scales) were analyzed using descriptive statistics to indicate central tendencies in data (means and standard deviations). A non-pragmatic test approach was adopted by illustrating the ranges. Data was captured through the Vicon Nexus 3D motion analyses system. Chi-square calculations was performed to determine a significant difference in JPS between the knees with AKP and the knees without AKP during single leg stance and active knee extension.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome
Proprioceptive Disorders
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
CASE_ONLY
Study Time Perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention was provided
No intervention given
Intervention Type
OTHER
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
None given
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants who adhered to the criteria listed below were considered for inclusion:
* Individuals aged between 14 and 40 years
* Insidious onset of clinical signs and symptoms of AKP (more than 3 months duration)
* Symptoms were provoked by prolonged sitting, squatting, stair-climbing and/or running.
* Participants needed to comply with the AKP screening tool and the diagnostic checklist (Leibbrandt \& Louw 2017)
* Individuals aged between 14 and 40 years
* Insidious onset of clinical signs and symptoms of AKP (more than 3 months duration)
* Symptoms were provoked by prolonged sitting, squatting, stair-climbing and/or running.
* Participants needed to comply with the AKP screening tool and the diagnostic checklist (Leibbrandt \& Louw 2017)
Exclusion Criteria
Participants were excluded if they presented with the following:
* AKP had resulted from a traumatic event such as a motor vehicle accident
* Previous knee surgery or injuries
* Clinical evidence of other knee pathologies
* If they were experiencing any other lower extremity injuries
* AKP had resulted from a traumatic event such as a motor vehicle accident
* Previous knee surgery or injuries
* Clinical evidence of other knee pathologies
* If they were experiencing any other lower extremity injuries
Minimum Eligible Age
14 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
40 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Research Foundation of South Africa
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Stellenbosch
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dominique Leibbrandt
Dr Dominique Leibbrandt (PhD Physiotherapy), Postdoctoral Researcher in Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stellenbosch Univeristy Medical Campus
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
South Africa
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Relph N, Herrington L. The effects of knee direction, physical activity and age on knee joint position sense. Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):393-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ehara Y, Fujimoto H, Miyazaki S, Mochimaru M, Tanaka S, Yamamoto S (1997) Comparison of the performance of the 3D camera system II. Gait and Posture 5: 251-255
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Clark NC, Akins JS, Heebner NR, Sell TC, Abt JP, Lovalekar M, Lephart SM. Reliability and measurement precision of concentric-to-isometric and eccentric-to-isometric knee active joint position sense tests in uninjured physically active adults. Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Mar;18:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Watson CJ, Propps M, Ratner J, Zeigler DL, Horton P, Smith SS. Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;35(3):136-46. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.3.136.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Green A, Liles C, Rushton A, Kyte DG. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2014 Dec;19(6):517-26. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Selfe J, Callaghan M, McHenry A, Richards J, Oldham J. An investigation into the effect of number of trials during proprioceptive testing in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1218-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.20127.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rhode C (2018). Proprioceptive differences in individuals with Anterior knee pain. Master's dissertation Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
Reference Type
RESULT
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DLeibbrandt
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
What is the Effect of Vision on Movement Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructed Patients 7 Months Post-surgery?
NCT05121857
UNKNOWN
Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
NCT04162613
RECRUITING
Association Between Knee Isokinetic Testing and Lower Limb Functional Performance and Limb Symmetry
NCT04885725
COMPLETED
The Effects of Cognitive Dual-Tasking in Later Stages of Rehabilitation After ACL Reconstruction
NCT06206200
RECRUITING
NA
Comapre Effects Of Proprioceptive Training And Core Instability Strength Training In Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
NCT05258227
COMPLETED
NA
Investigation of the Effects of Proprioceptive Exercises After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
NCT07333092
RECRUITING
NA
The Effect Subtalar Joint Pronation on Postural Stability and Lower Extremity Alignment
NCT05606835
COMPLETED
NA
Anterior Cruciate Ligaments: Studying Updates in neuroCognition After Knee Manipulation
NCT07058467
RECRUITING
NA
The Acute Effects of Ankle Exercises on Knee Proprioception
NCT07194031
COMPLETED
NA
External Focus of Attention Feedback to Reduce Risk of Non-contact ACL Injury
NCT04914689
RECRUITING
NA
What is the Influence of Visual-motor Reliance on Planned and Unplanned Change of Direction Biomechanics 7 Months Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
NCT05141812
UNKNOWN
Biomechanical Determinants of Different Rehabilitation Protocols for ACL Reconstruction
NCT05733936
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Effects of Hip Abductors Strengthening In Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05272124
COMPLETED
NA
Proprioceptive Function, Postural Stability & Clinical Outcome After Stump Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
NCT01348945
UNKNOWN
NA
A Prehab Strengthening Program Prior to ACL Surgery on Lower Limb Structure and Function
NCT05374382
UNKNOWN
NA
The Effect of a Treatment Protocol Focused on Neuromuscular Control Exercises on Pain and Function in a Subgroup of Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain
NCT06893289
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Analysis of Knee Joint of Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Undergoing Physiotherapy After Two Different Surgical Techniques: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06809920
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Proprioception in the Improvement of Sports Performance in Long Jumpers.
NCT03871738
COMPLETED
NA
Enhancing Stability and Function in Adolescent
NCT06696872
COMPLETED
NA
Effects of Different Concentric and Eccentric Muscle Fatigue Protocols on the Knee Joint Position Sense
NCT06331221
COMPLETED
NA
Changes in Inter-joint Coordination and Muscle Activation After Cruciate Ligament Injury of the Knee Joint
NCT01584973
UNKNOWN
Lower Extremity Alignment and Dynamic Control With Associated Injury Risk in College Athletes With Knee Hyperextension
NCT03425968
COMPLETED
Neuromuscular Rehab for ACL Reconstruction: Knee Function & Brain Plasticity
NCT07243860
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Postural Stability Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT07210853
COMPLETED
Muscle Activation of the Lower Limb in Response to a Medio-lateral Imbalance in Monopodal Stance
NCT05080036
COMPLETED
NA