Deportalization, Venous Deprivation, Venous Congestion

NCT ID: NCT03995459

Last Updated: 2019-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with multiple primary or secondary liver tumors have a low survival rate unless they can benefit from curative extended hepatic resections with R0 or R1 marge resection. Post-operative acute liver failure may occur after such surgery when the remnant liver is insufficient, leading to high morbimortality.

The future remnant liver (FRL) preoperative evaluation is then the key consideration before performing extended liver resection. The FRL volume measurement on computed tomography (CT) imaging is the most widespread method of FRL evaluation. Threshold values of acceptable FRL volume depend on the underlying liver function, it ranges from 20-30% in healthy liver to 40% in cirrhotic liver. However, it recently appeared that the FRL function would be more valuable in predicting post-operative liver failure. 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) combined with SPECT/CT enables reliable FRL function measurement with a threshold value calculated at 2.69%/min/m2, to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure.

When the FRL evaluation does not reach the acceptable threshold values to avoid liver failure, portal vein embolization (PVE), consisting of portal branches occlusion of the future removed liver, can be performed. It is now the standard of care to induce FRL regeneration before surgery. Right PVE induces right hemiliver (S5-8) deportalization (portal input deprivation with hepatic venous drainage preservation) leading to left hemiliver (S2-4) regeneration.

To optimize PVE results, recent effective techniques have been developed such as the simultaneous embolization of the right portal branch and the right hepatic vein (HV), and the right accessory HV if so, which is called liver venous deprivation technique. Additional simultaneous embolization of the middle HV defined the extended liver venous deprivation (ELVD) technique. ELVD induces right liver (S5-8) venous deprivation (deprivation of both portal input and venous drainage) and leads to rapid increase in FRL function. After ELVD, segment IV (S4) portal input from left portal branch is preserved while its venous drainage through the middle HV is disrupted, resulting in venous congestion.

The aim of this study is to analyze the volumetric and functional evolutions after embolization procedures in deportalized liver (S5-8 after PVE), vein-deprived liver (S5-8 after ELVD) and congestive liver (S4 after ELVD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Liver Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> or = 18 years
* primary or secondary liver tumor(s)
* major hepatectomy approved by multidisciplinary tumor meeting
* small FRL (baseline FLR \<2.69%/min/m2)

Exclusion Criteria

* liver fibrosis / cirrhosis
* biliary obstruction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

BORIS GUIU, PU-PH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL19_0250

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.