Investigation of the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognition in Depression
NCT ID: NCT03977038
Last Updated: 2023-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-30
2022-06-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rTMS and Cognitive Training in Youth Depression
NCT03708172
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment Resistant Depressive Disorder
NCT01515215
Effect of Theta-burst rTMS Therapy on the Clinical and Cognitive Symptoms of Patients With Therapy Resistant Depression and Response Prediction With Neuroimaging Methods.
NCT07207239
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Trajectory of Outcomes Study
NCT04376697
The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Human Subjects
NCT00658307
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Emotionally-laden functions within the brain are classified as "hot cognition" and contrastingly, affective-neutral areas regulating domains such as concentration, attention, learning and memory and executive function correspond to the characterization of "cold cognition" system. Both ''hot'' (emotion-laden) and ''cold'' (emotion-independent) cognition are known to take a role in the pathophysiology of MDD.
It is known that individuals suffering from depression experience impairments in hot cognition and as a result dedicate excessive focus to negative information, thereby producing negativity bias. A dysfunctional cold cognition system in depression also persists due to hypoactivity and abnormal functional connectivity of its underlying networks. The potential effects of rTMS on hot and cold cognition are currently uncertain. This study seeks to simultaneously evaluate hot and cold cognitive processes in response to deep TMS in order to elucidate the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved. More specifically, the investigators seek to explore the interaction between the two in terms of the time course and magnitude of the improvements in each system in response to TMS, and their relationship to mood improvement.
Methodology The subjects in the TRD group will undergo High Frequency deep TMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over L-DLPFC, at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% motor threshold value, for 5 daily sessions per week, over the course of 6 weeks. After the completion of treatment course at the conclusion of the 6 week mark, one post-treatment follow-up visit will take place at 1 month in order to assess any longer-term effects on cognition and depressive symptoms.
* Visual scanning The visual scanning test will consist of the presentation of 81 slides: 32 test slides (consisting of emotional images taken from Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) standardized library of facial expressions as well as a set of images with suicidal valence) and 49 filler slides. Each of the test and filler slides will contain four images at each of the four quadrants of the slide. The subjects' visual scanning behavior of the test slides will be analyzed while the scanning behavior of the filler slides will not be analyzed. Filler slides will change from session to session while the images on the test slides will remain the same. The position as well as the order of presentation of the four images on each test slide will randomly change between sessions. By using a large number of filler slides (different filler slides for each session), a randomized order for the presentation of the test slides and a randomized order for the position of the four images on each test slide, the investigators are aiming to minimize the possibility that patients' scanning behavior will be affected by recall from previous presentations. Each slide will be presented for 11 seconds for a total presentation time of 15 minutes.
* CANTAB measures For measuring the domains of cold cognition, the CANTAB measure which is a series of cognitive tests will be utilized. This battery is comprised of tests in the following cognitive domains: Attention, Executive Function, Memory and Social-Emotional Cognition. For the purposes of this study, the following cognitive tests will be implemented: For the domain of Attention, Motor screening task (MOT) \[2 minutes\] which evaluates potential sensorimotor or comprehension deficits, and Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) \[7 minutes\] which measures sustained attention are administered. For the domain of Executive Function, One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (OTS) \[10 minutes\] test that is built upon the foundation of "Tower of Hanoi" test and evaluates working memory and spatial planning subdomains of executive function will be implemented. For the domain of Memory, Verbal Recognition Memory (VRM) \[10 minutes\] will be used. VRM is a measure of new learning and verbal memory through the ability of collecting verbal information and its retrieval. For the domain of Social-Emotional Cognition, Emotion Recognition Task (ERT) \[6-10 minutes\] will be utilized which assesses the subject's ability in identification of six basic human emotions in facial expression along that expression's magnitude spectrum. Overall time allocated to conducting the aforementioned CANTAB measures will be approximately 40 minutes. As the subjects are engaging with these tests, the eye-tracking apparatus will be set up in the meantime \[15-20 minutes\] to enhance efficiency in time management and optimize the use of time. Following the completion of CANTAB tests, the subjects will promptly begin and complete the visual eye-tracking exercise \[15 minutes\]. Total time allocated to these measures of hot and cold cognition will approximate 1 hour.
* Bloodwork Past research indicates elevated levels of plasma inflammatory markers in depressive patients compared to non-depressed individuals among which markers such as tumor necrosis factor ⍺ (TNF-⍺) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been most reliably seen to exhibit heightened concentration levels in plasma. It has also been shown that depressed individuals had a higher likelihood of portraying non-response towards antidepressant medication carry a higher level of inflammatory markers at baseline and follow-up than those who responded to antidepressant therapy.
It has also been suggested that the number of unsuccessful antidepressant treatment trials indicating resistance and non-responsiveness in treatment resistant depressed individuals is associated with elevated plasma concentration of inflammatory markers of TNF-⍺ and IL-6 compared to responsive depressed individuals who had undergone one adequate antidepressant trial successfully and those with no previous history of antidepressant treatment. As a biological marker of rTMS antidepressant efficacy, bloodwork will be obtained a total of 4 times throughout the course of the study in order to monitor for genotype of serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and potential alterations in present levels of the inflammatory markers of TNF-⍺ and IL-6 involved in the pathophysiological inflammation profile of depression.
● Psychiatric scales The severity of depressive symptoms in subjects will be assessed using the physician-rated HDRS-17 and self-report QIDS-SR16 psychiatric scales.
Analysis Following the end of the last visit at Week 6, patients will be grouped by response status: responder, and non-responder. Responder is defined as a patient with a change of 50% or greater on the HDRS-17 measure from baseline (V2) to the last visit (V8).
For each stage of testing, following the start of treatment (i.e. V2 to V8), differences from baseline (V2) of average visual fixation time, average fixation frequency, HDRS-17 and QIDS-SR16 scores will be calculated. The primary outcome measure, i.e., the difference from baseline of the average fixation time measured on different visits (V2 to V8), will be analyzed using linear mixed effect model with fixed effects and a random subject effect. The investigators will initially fit a mixed model with fixed effects of time and group and their interaction, and random intercepts and slopes. Similar models will be built for the secondary outcome variables comprising of average difference from baseline of fixation frequency, HDRS-17 and QIDS-SR16 scores.
The investigators will use the group main effect and the group-time interaction to test the hypothesis that changes in differences from baseline of fixation time differ between responders and non-responders. The investigators expect the differences from baseline of average fixation time will become more negative (decrease) in the responder group but will remain unchanged in the non-responder group. It is also expected that this reduction in the differences from baseline of average fixation time will precede any significant changes in depressive symptom scores on measures of HDRS-17 or QIDS-SR16.
Similarly, changes in the secondary outcome measures (difference from baseline of average fixation frequency, HDRS-17 and QIDS-SR16 scores) during the study course will also be analyzed in order to demonstrate an expected difference between responders and non-responders. The investigators expect the difference from baseline of fixation frequency will increase and that HDRS-17 and QIDS-SR16 will reduce by the conclusion of this study in the responder but not in the non-responder group. The investigators predict, however that any change in the HDRS-17 or QIDS-SR16 scores will succeed visual scanning parameters (i.e., difference from baseline of average fixation time or average fixation frequency) and only be observed at later time points.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TRD sample
Individuals in the treatment resistant depression (TRD) sample suffer from the condition called TRD. The intervention that will be administered to this group is the standardized rTMS treatment using High Frequency dTMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over L-DLPFC, at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% value of the individual's motor threshold, in 5 daily sessions per week, taking place each weekday, over the course of 6 weeks.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is prescribed as first-line treatment for TRD patients (4). rTMS is safe, tolerable and non-invasive neurostimulation procedure where powerful magnetic pulses are transmitted through the skull into the underlying cortical cortex with the aim of electrical current induction within the neural tissue. This study administers a standard dose of rTMS treatment to the TRD patient sample consisting of high frequency deep TMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% value of the individual's motor threshold, in 5 daily sessions per week, taking place each weekday, over the course of 6 weeks. The technology of dTMS, which will be used in this study, is an adaptation of the therapeutic intervention of rTMS with the advancement of possessing higher efficacy in targeting deeper brain regions of interest.
Healthy Controls (HC) sample
Individuals in the HC sample are age-, sex-, education-matched to the individuals in the TRD sample. HC sample does not receive any therapeutic treatment and are solely examined as a comparative measure of normal cognitive capabilities.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is prescribed as first-line treatment for TRD patients (4). rTMS is safe, tolerable and non-invasive neurostimulation procedure where powerful magnetic pulses are transmitted through the skull into the underlying cortical cortex with the aim of electrical current induction within the neural tissue. This study administers a standard dose of rTMS treatment to the TRD patient sample consisting of high frequency deep TMS (HF-dTMS) stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC), at the frequency of 18Hz, at 120% value of the individual's motor threshold, in 5 daily sessions per week, taking place each weekday, over the course of 6 weeks. The technology of dTMS, which will be used in this study, is an adaptation of the therapeutic intervention of rTMS with the advancement of possessing higher efficacy in targeting deeper brain regions of interest.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* For the healthy control group, subjects should be matched to the patient group in domains of age, sex and education; as well as being devoid of any current or previous history of neuropsychiatric illness.
* Patient group subjects must have a score of at least 20 on the HDRS-17 at time of assessment.
* All subjects (patients and healthy controls) should be between the ages of 18 and 65.
* All subjects (patients and healthy controls) must be capable of providing their informed written consent.
* For the patient group, it is essential that subjects who are taking antidepressant medications maintain a stable dose of medication for at least 4 weeks prior to start of treatment and also continue maintaining this stability throughout the course of treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with current and past history of epilepsy
* Recent history of substance abuse/dependence (excluding nicotine and caffeine) within the past 6 months as defined by DSM-5
* History of suicide attempts or self-harm within the past 12 months
* Current or previous diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders (including psychotic disorder due to general medical condition, substance-induced psychotic, psychotic disorder not otherwise specified) as defined by the MINI
* Previous lack of response to rTMS
* Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within the 3 months prior to beginning of study
* Inability to communicate in English language
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Peter Giacobbe
Clinical Head, Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Giacobbe, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Harquail Centre For Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robinson OJ, Roiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. In: McIntyre, R.S. (Ed.), Cognitive Impairment in Major Depressive Disorder.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2016.
Lantrip C, Gunning FM, Flashman L, Roth RM, Holtzheimer PE. Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Cognitive Control of Emotion: Potential Antidepressant Mechanisms. J ECT. 2017 Jun;33(2):73-80. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000386.
Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates and enhances the clinical response to antidepressants in major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;74(2):e122-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07996.
Serafini G, Pompili M, Belvederi Murri M, Respino M, Ghio L, Girardi P, Fitzgerald PB, Amore M. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive performance in treatment-resistant depression. A systematic review. Neuropsychobiology. 2015;71(3):125-39. doi: 10.1159/000381351. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Cambridge Cognition Ltd Website. https://www.cambridgecognition.com/cantab/
Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK, Lanctot KL. A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):446-57. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.033. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Howren MB, Lamkin DM, Suls J. Associations of depression with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2009 Feb;71(2):171-86. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181907c1b. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
Strawbridge R, Arnone D, Danese A, Papadopoulos A, Herane Vives A, Cleare AJ. Inflammation and clinical response to treatment in depression: A meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;25(10):1532-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
Haroon E, Daguanno AW, Woolwine BJ, Goldsmith DR, Baer WM, Wommack EC, Felger JC, Miller AH. Antidepressant treatment resistance is associated with increased inflammatory markers in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Sep;95:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 19.
Daniele A, Divella R, Paradiso A, Mattioli V, Romito F, Giotta F, Casamassima P, Quaranta M. Serotonin transporter polymorphism in major depressive disorder (MDD), psychiatric disorders, and in MDD in response to stressful life events: causes and treatment with antidepressant. In Vivo. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):895-901.
Lee BH, Kim YK. The roles of BDNF in the pathophysiology of major depression and in antidepressant treatment. Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Dec;7(4):231-5. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.4.231. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Sharp R. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jun;65(4):340. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv043. No abstract available.
Reilly TJ, MacGillivray SA, Reid IC, Cameron IM. Psychometric properties of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jan;60:132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J, Modirrousta M, Patry S, Vila-Rodriguez F, Lam RW, MacQueen GM, Parikh SV, Ravindran AV; CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):561-75. doi: 10.1177/0706743716660033. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
World Health Organization. Depression: Fact Sheet. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/. Updated February 2017.
Gupta M, Holshausen K, Best MW, Jokic R, Milev R, Bernard T, Gou L, Bowie CR. Relationships among neurocognition, symptoms, and functioning in treatment-resistant depression. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 May;28(3):272-81. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act002. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Roiser JP, Sahakian BJ. Hot and cold cognition in depression. CNS Spectr. 2013 Jun;18(3):139-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000072. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.
Harmer CJ, Shelley NC, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. Increased positive versus negative affective perception and memory in healthy volunteers following selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1256-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1256.
Stange JP, Jenkins LM, Hamlat EJ, Bessette KL, DelDonno SR, Kling LR, Passarotti AM, Phan KL, Klumpp H, Ryan KA, Langenecker SA. Disrupted engagement of networks supporting hot and cold cognition in remitted major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
096-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.