What is the Impact of the Presence of a Support Person on Informed Consent
NCT ID: NCT03966469
Last Updated: 2020-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
82 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-17
2020-02-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Survey of Patient's Attitudes Towards Consent For Clinical Research In Anesthesiology
NCT01546194
Patients Gender Influence on Communication of Anaesthesia Risk
NCT06814236
The Influence of Ventilation on Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders
NCT04106869
Cognitive Training for the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium
NCT02963961
Effects of Cognitive Intervention Therapy on Postoperative Delirium
NCT06178939
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In practice, the investigators recommend that patients bring a family member or close friend to their pre-operative appointment to help with patient anxiety, comprehension, and informed decision-making. However, there is limited literature to support this recommendation. The investigators hypothesize that having a family member or close friend present will decrease patient anxiety and improve patient satisfaction and recall regarding the risks/benefits/ alternatives of surgery.
Study Objectives The primary objective is to assess the impact of having a support person present during the patient's preoperative visit on patient anxiety regarding informed consent for surgery. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of a support person on patient satisfaction, self-assessment of understanding, knowledge, time spent with patient, and pre- and post-operative phone calls.
Hypotheses HO: For women with a support person present during their preoperative visit, there is no difference in the patient-reported anxiety regarding informed consent for surgery compared with women without a support person present.
HA: For women with a support person present during their preoperative visit, there is a difference in the patient-reported anxiety regarding informed consent for surgery compared with women without a support person present.
Research Questions
The research questions to be answered as a part of this study are:
Does having a support person present at the pre-operative visit affect anxiety, satisfaction, preparedness and knowledge regarding their surgery? Does having a support person present impact utilization of clinic resources including preoperative phone calls, and postoperative phone calls?
Study Design and Methods This study will be a prospective cohort study. All women scheduled to undergo vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery will be recruited from the Urogynecology clinics of the Hartford Hospital Medical Group at the time of their pre-operative appointment. Patients who qualify for inclusion and consent to participate will be enrolled in the study.
Participants will be assigned to one of two arms:
the "support person present" arm, or the "patient present only" arm.
Participants will answer questionnaires prior to their appointment with the physician, after the appointment, 2-3 days prior to surgery via telephone, and at their postoperative appointment.
Risks/Benefits to Patients This is a minimal-risk study. The only research element, and therefore introduction of potential risk(s) beyond standard-of-care treatment, comprises administration of several surveys and data collection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Support Person Present
Participants who bring a support person with them to their preoperative appointment.
Preoperative support person present
Participants who bring a support person to their preoperative appointment.
Patient Present Only
Participants who present by themselves to their preoperative appointment.
Patient Present Only
Patient presents to their preoperative appointment without a support person.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preoperative support person present
Participants who bring a support person to their preoperative appointment.
Patient Present Only
Patient presents to their preoperative appointment without a support person.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to understand English
* Able/willing to sign the informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to provide consent
* Resident of a long-term care facility or utilization of a home health service
* Scheduled for outpatient surgery
* non-English speaking
* unable/unwilling to sign informed consent document
18 Years
89 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hartford Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elisabeth Sappenfield
Principle Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sappenfield EC, O'Sullivan DM, Steinberg AC. The Value of a Support Person During the Surgical Consent Process: A Prospective Cohort Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 1;28(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001059.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HHC-2018-0251
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.