Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) With Trabectedin

NCT ID: NCT03959033

Last Updated: 2022-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-29

Study Completion Date

2019-08-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are central to understanding the impact of cancer treatments on patients. Treatment may control cancer growth, and even sometimes modestly improve the length of life, but at the expense of disruption of lifestyle, and of toxicities. It is very important to use PROMs to evaluate the balance between these risks and benefits to understand the overall impact of the treatment.

It remains poorly described whether patients report improved outcomes during palliative chemotherapy with trabectedin, using high quality questionnaires, and how this may vary with the clinical effects and duration of the treatment and characteristics of the patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trabectedin improves progression-free survival in un-resectable advanced soft tissue sarcoma, in particular lipo- and leiomyo- sarcomas after failure of conventional chemotherapy, with a low level of reported grade 3 symptomatic toxicity for many patients. However objective responses are infrequent, with the largest proportion of patients who benefit using traditional oncological response criteria having a delay in progression with the cancer stable. Trabectedin may improve the duration of cancer control by the modulation of cancer growth as measured by the growth modulation index (GMI).

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are central to understanding the impact of cancer therapies which may shrink cancers or control their growth, and even sometimes modestly improve the length of life, but at the expense of disruption of lifestyle, and of toxicities.

It is very important to use PROMs to evaluate the balance between these risks and benefits to understand the overall impact of the therapy. It remains poorly described whether patients report improved outcomes during palliative chemotherapy with trabectedin, using validated questionnaires, and how this may vary with the clinical efficacy and duration of the treatment and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient. Therefore the investigators intend to examine the feasibility of collecting patient reported outcome measures using validated instruments prospectively during English NHS administration of Trabectedin and with this to explore the pattern of patient reported outcomes, such as is the trajectory in PROMs distinct comparing groups by the size or symptoms from tumour masses.

The study will aim deliver Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) data in patients with advanced tissue sarcoma. The recruitment target is a total of 30 patients over a 2 year period. Patients' quality of life (QoL) will be captured using a validated QoL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) during their treatment with Trabectedin. The questionnaire takes approximately 12 minutes and the patient will complete this unaided. Patients will be required to complete the electronic questionnaire using Q-Tool. Q-Tool is a web-based piece of software. Patients will be required to complete this questionnaire alongside receiving standard of care treatment with Trabectedin in the following pattern: On the day of administration of the 1st of treatment with Trabectedin; before the 2nd treatment of Trabectedin; before the 4th treatment of Trabectedin; prior to the 7th treatment of Trabectedin; prior to the 10th treatment of Trabectedin and then will continue in 3 weekly cycles until the end of treatment with Trabectedin. Patients will complete the questionnaire on the computer terminals available in the outpatient clinic before they see the doctor and nurses and prior to treatment on each of these days.

Patients at the end of treatment with Trabectedin will complete a short exit questionnaire. This will assess their experiences of completing the QoL questionnaire and ease of using Q-Tool. The exit questionnaire will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. This will be completed in the outpatient area and provided to the patient by the Research Nurse.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sarcoma Liposarcoma Leiomyosarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* This study will include adult patients treated in Leeds with an indication for Trabectedin as either second or third line therapy for relapsed soft tissue sarcoma.
* Patients will have the ability to provide informed consent and they will have adequate literacy in reading English, or complete the instrument using an NHS interpreter.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

130 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daniel Stark

Associate Professor of Cancer Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Stark

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Leeds

Daniel Stark

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16/WM/0446

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.