Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) With Trabectedin
NCT ID: NCT03959033
Last Updated: 2022-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
7 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-11-29
2019-08-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It remains poorly described whether patients report improved outcomes during palliative chemotherapy with trabectedin, using high quality questionnaires, and how this may vary with the clinical effects and duration of the treatment and characteristics of the patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect on Patient Reported Outcomes of VATS and SABR (LILAC)
NCT02882750
A Translational Study Investigating PD-L1 Expression After Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03258788
Livestrong Cancer Institutes' Patient Reported Outcomes Study
NCT04627077
LIFE-Lung Bronchoscopy in Patients at Risk for Developing Lung Cancer
NCT00260598
Predictive Models of Treatment Responses and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Osteosarcoma
NCT05194605
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are central to understanding the impact of cancer therapies which may shrink cancers or control their growth, and even sometimes modestly improve the length of life, but at the expense of disruption of lifestyle, and of toxicities.
It is very important to use PROMs to evaluate the balance between these risks and benefits to understand the overall impact of the therapy. It remains poorly described whether patients report improved outcomes during palliative chemotherapy with trabectedin, using validated questionnaires, and how this may vary with the clinical efficacy and duration of the treatment and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient. Therefore the investigators intend to examine the feasibility of collecting patient reported outcome measures using validated instruments prospectively during English NHS administration of Trabectedin and with this to explore the pattern of patient reported outcomes, such as is the trajectory in PROMs distinct comparing groups by the size or symptoms from tumour masses.
The study will aim deliver Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) data in patients with advanced tissue sarcoma. The recruitment target is a total of 30 patients over a 2 year period. Patients' quality of life (QoL) will be captured using a validated QoL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) during their treatment with Trabectedin. The questionnaire takes approximately 12 minutes and the patient will complete this unaided. Patients will be required to complete the electronic questionnaire using Q-Tool. Q-Tool is a web-based piece of software. Patients will be required to complete this questionnaire alongside receiving standard of care treatment with Trabectedin in the following pattern: On the day of administration of the 1st of treatment with Trabectedin; before the 2nd treatment of Trabectedin; before the 4th treatment of Trabectedin; prior to the 7th treatment of Trabectedin; prior to the 10th treatment of Trabectedin and then will continue in 3 weekly cycles until the end of treatment with Trabectedin. Patients will complete the questionnaire on the computer terminals available in the outpatient clinic before they see the doctor and nurses and prior to treatment on each of these days.
Patients at the end of treatment with Trabectedin will complete a short exit questionnaire. This will assess their experiences of completing the QoL questionnaire and ease of using Q-Tool. The exit questionnaire will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. This will be completed in the outpatient area and provided to the patient by the Research Nurse.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients will have the ability to provide informed consent and they will have adequate literacy in reading English, or complete the instrument using an NHS interpreter.
16 Years
130 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leeds
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Stark
Associate Professor of Cancer Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Stark
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Leeds
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/WM/0446
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.