Evaluating the Effectiveness of Bilateral ESPB in Addition to Standard Analgesia at Reducing Opioid Consumption
NCT ID: NCT03954249
Last Updated: 2026-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-07
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-guided Multilevel Erectorspinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Prevention of Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome for Breast Cancer Patients
NCT06884852
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04457115
Erector Spinae Block Versus PECS Block Type II for Breast Surgeries
NCT04284124
Different Volumes of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Breast Surgery
NCT05232084
ESP in Breast Surgery Due to Cancer
NCT04726878
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current regional techniques for breast and other thoracic surgeries, such as open heart surgery, include the PEC I, PEC II, serratus anterior block as well as the paravertebral block. Of these options, the paravertebral block is heralded as the gold standard for multimodal analgesia in breast surgery. Unfortunately, the paravertebral block carries with it the risk of pneumothorax due to its proximity to the pleura. This risk is also increased when an inexperienced provider is performing the block, which is common on an academic institution. As a result, the PEC I, PEC II and serratus anterior blocks have gained traction, is that they carry less risk of adverse events. One drawback of the PEC blocks and serratus anterior block is that they may not achieve adequate anterior spread and complete coverage of the surgical field, making them less effective at providing adequate post-operative analgesia. Due to these drawbacks, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has begun to gain traction as the regional technique of choice for breast surgery. The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. \[1\] It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves. It is because of this mechanism of action that this block has been call the "paravertebral by proxy." The spread of the local anesthetic is volume-dependent, and has been seen to anesthetize between 3-8 vertebral levels when using local anesthetic volumes of 15-20mL. The ESPB has been used successfully for analgesia in open-heart surgery as well as in chronic thoracic neuropathy secondary to herpetic neuralgia. Proponents of the erector spinae block prefer it to the paravertebral block for its ease to perform and seemingly safer profile.
The investigators seek to explore the proposed benefits of the erector spinae plane block in our patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty. Reducing overall opioid use and enhancing recovery after surgery are areas of great importance in the ambulatory, outpatient setting. The investigators hope to show the positive impact of ESPB on both of important perioperative factors.
UPDATE (1/27/2026): The 'actual' Enrollment total has been updated from 76 to 78 on account of an error identified from the time the record was completed in May 2022.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Erector Spinae nerve block group
Receive multimodal analgesia and in addition erector spinae plane block
Erecto Spinae nerve block
The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves.
Multimodal Analgesia group
Receive standard multimodal analgesia
Multimodal Analgesia
Patients in the control group will receive standard 100mg pregabalin PO, midazolam 2mg IV, fentanyl 100mcg IV.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erecto Spinae nerve block
The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves.
Multimodal Analgesia
Patients in the control group will receive standard 100mg pregabalin PO, midazolam 2mg IV, fentanyl 100mcg IV.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \>18 years
* ASA class I-III
Exclusion Criteria
* Renal insufficiency (defined as CKD stage 3 or greater)
* Infection at the skin at the site of needle puncture
* Known allergies to any study drugs
* Coagulopathy
* Severe asthmatics
* BMI \>40
* ASA 4 and 5
* Pre-existing pain disorder
* Regular consumption of chronic pain medication
* Failed block
* Diagnosis of OSA
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Montefiore Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elilary Montilla Medrano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Montefiore Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-10183
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.