Evaluating the Effectiveness of Bilateral ESPB in Addition to Standard Analgesia at Reducing Opioid Consumption

NCT ID: NCT03954249

Last Updated: 2026-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-07

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study the benefits of a Erector Spinae nerve block for pain control and decrease narcotics usage after mammoplasty in an ambulatory setting

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast surgery is among the most common procedures performed at ambulatory surgery centers. Whether for cosmetic or cancer indications, mastectomy and reduction mammoplasty are being performed under general anesthesia with standard multimodal pharmacologic analgesia. Regional anesthetic techniques have become increasingly prevalent in the management of postoperative analgesia. In oncologic surgery, regional anesthetic techniques have demonstrated a lower incidence of recurrence or metastasis of breast cancer compared to opioid analgesia. The breast has complex innervation, receiving innervation from C5-T7, thus posing a challenge to the regional anesthesiologist.

Current regional techniques for breast and other thoracic surgeries, such as open heart surgery, include the PEC I, PEC II, serratus anterior block as well as the paravertebral block. Of these options, the paravertebral block is heralded as the gold standard for multimodal analgesia in breast surgery. Unfortunately, the paravertebral block carries with it the risk of pneumothorax due to its proximity to the pleura. This risk is also increased when an inexperienced provider is performing the block, which is common on an academic institution. As a result, the PEC I, PEC II and serratus anterior blocks have gained traction, is that they carry less risk of adverse events. One drawback of the PEC blocks and serratus anterior block is that they may not achieve adequate anterior spread and complete coverage of the surgical field, making them less effective at providing adequate post-operative analgesia. Due to these drawbacks, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has begun to gain traction as the regional technique of choice for breast surgery. The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. \[1\] It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves. It is because of this mechanism of action that this block has been call the "paravertebral by proxy." The spread of the local anesthetic is volume-dependent, and has been seen to anesthetize between 3-8 vertebral levels when using local anesthetic volumes of 15-20mL. The ESPB has been used successfully for analgesia in open-heart surgery as well as in chronic thoracic neuropathy secondary to herpetic neuralgia. Proponents of the erector spinae block prefer it to the paravertebral block for its ease to perform and seemingly safer profile.

The investigators seek to explore the proposed benefits of the erector spinae plane block in our patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty. Reducing overall opioid use and enhancing recovery after surgery are areas of great importance in the ambulatory, outpatient setting. The investigators hope to show the positive impact of ESPB on both of important perioperative factors.

UPDATE (1/27/2026): The 'actual' Enrollment total has been updated from 76 to 78 on account of an error identified from the time the record was completed in May 2022.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Erector Spinae nerve block group

Receive multimodal analgesia and in addition erector spinae plane block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erecto Spinae nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves.

Multimodal Analgesia group

Receive standard multimodal analgesia

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multimodal Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the control group will receive standard 100mg pregabalin PO, midazolam 2mg IV, fentanyl 100mcg IV.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erecto Spinae nerve block

The ESPB is a myofascial block alternative to the paravertebral block. It is performed by injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the spinal transverse process. The ESPB is thought to be safer than the paravertebral block because the transverse process acts as a barrier to the pleura. It has been postulated that local anesthetic spread reaches the paravertebral space and in fact, cadaveric studies have shown dye spreading to involve the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Multimodal Analgesia

Patients in the control group will receive standard 100mg pregabalin PO, midazolam 2mg IV, fentanyl 100mcg IV.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty
* Age \>18 years
* ASA class I-III

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Renal insufficiency (defined as CKD stage 3 or greater)
* Infection at the skin at the site of needle puncture
* Known allergies to any study drugs
* Coagulopathy
* Severe asthmatics
* BMI \>40
* ASA 4 and 5
* Pre-existing pain disorder
* Regular consumption of chronic pain medication
* Failed block
* Diagnosis of OSA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elilary Montilla Medrano, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-10183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.