The Clinical Course of Interstitial Pneumonia With Autoimmune Features
NCT ID: NCT03950583
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
68 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-11
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this observational trial is to define the clinical course of patients newly diagnosed with IPAF by prospectively following them for a period of 3 years, at 6-month intervals. The primary outcome will be 3-year lung transplant-free survival. The secondary outcome will be the proportion of patients who develop clinical and laboratoristic features clearly meeting criteria for a diagnosis of CTD at 3 years from the time of diagnosis of IPAF. Predictors of survival will also be studied.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Characteristics of Interstitial Pneumonia With Autoimmune Features (IPAF) - a Multicenter Prospective Study
NCT03870828
Characteristics and Health Related Quality of Life in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
NCT03171870
A Study to Test Different Imaging Techniques in Patients With Different Types of Interstitial Lung Disease
NCT05492994
Evaluation of HRCT Patterns in Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease
NCT05482607
Registry of Autoimmune Interstitial Lung Disease
NCT05365009
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rationale Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD) with some laboratoristic and/or clinical features of autoimmune disease, but without meeting criteria of connective tissue disease (CTD), and with no other causes of ILD.
It is not uncommon for the interstitial pneumonia to be the first, and possibly the sole, manifestation of an otherwise occult CTD. The current international guidelines for the diagnosis of IIP recommend excluding CTD. For this reason, many cases of ILD with autoimmune features, but not fully meeting criteria for CTD, have been identified. Patients with IPAF, with the current diagnostic criteria, actually represent a sizable proportion of patients with ILD. However, the clinical course, prognosis and treatment approach to these patients remain unclear.
Despite recent efforts to standardize the diagnosis of IPAF, subjects with IPAF represent a very heterogenous group of patients, whose prognosis and clinical course are far from being clear. While the average age of diagnosis is higher than in CTD, there is still a female predominance. An autoimmune "flavor" may not necessarily mean a real autoimmune etiology, but currently the distinction is challenging. From this perspective, a multi-disciplinary approach together with Rheumatologist is particularly important. It also remains to be clarified what proportion of IPAF patients develop clear features of CTD over time. One issue for example is represented by the fact patient with IPAF may be treated with immunosuppressive agents, which may permanently mask the development of systemic features of CTD.
A clear distinction between IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), one of the most common types of ILD, is at the same time challenging and essential, as treatment is radically different in the two conditions. CTD and IPAF patients can definitely present with the same morphologic (radiographic or pathologic) pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia. However, patients with IPF respond to anti-fibrotic treatment, which is expensive, while patients with ILD secondary to CTD respond to immunosuppressive treatment. From a prognostic point of view, the survival of IPF is considered one of the worst among all types of ILD.
There is tendency to treat patients with IPAF with immunosuppressive therapy, but the rational for this remains unclear, given that the natural history of IPAF is not well known. One retrospective study suggested that the short-term prognosis of IPAF is better than that of IPF. Another retrospective study however showed that survival is worse than in CTD-ILD. At the same time, the latter study showed that patients with IPAF and UIP morphologic pattern had the same, poor prognosis of IPF patients, raising concern that they were actually IPF patients to start with and that they were mislabelled as IPAF. Again, the retrospective nature of these studies makes the results more difficult to interpret.
In 2015, in an effort to standardize the diagnosis of IPAF, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American thoracic Society (ATS) published a research statement that outlined the proposed diagnostic criteria for IPAF. These include:
1. Presence of an interstitial pneumonia (HRCT or SLB) and,
2. Exclusion of alternative etiologies and,
3. Does not meet criteria of defined CTD and,
4. At least one feature from at least two of these domains A. Clinical Domain B. Serologic Domain C. Morphologic Domain
A. Clinical domain:
* Distal digital fissuring (i.e. "mechanic hands")
* Distal digital tip ulceration
* Inflammatory arthritis or polyarticular morning joint stiffness ≥60 min
* Palmar telangiectasia
* Raynaud's phenomenon
* Unexplained digital edema
* Unexplained fixed rash on the digital extensor surfaces (Gottron's sign)
Symptoms or signs of peripheral joint synovitis considered as evidence for inflammatory arthritis, but joint pain alone is not included due to its lack of specificity.
Other non-specific features, such as alopecia, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, weight loss, sicca symptoms, myalgia or arthralgia, are not included.
Demographic profiles that may be more frequently encountered in CTD (such as younger age and female, sex) are not included given their lack of specificity for CTD-ILD.
Digital fissuring ("mechanic hands"), Gottron's sign usually suggestive of anti-synthetase syndrome or systemic sclerosis-myositis overlap Raynaud's phenomenon, palmar telangiectasia, distal digital tip ulceration and digital edema are usually suggestive of scleroderma.
B. Serologic domain:
* ANA ≥1:320 titre, diffuse, speckled, homogeneous patterns or
* ANA nucleolar pattern (any titre) or
* ANA centromere pattern (any titre)
* Rheumatoid factor ≥2× upper limit of normal
* Anti-CCP
* Anti-dsDNA
* Anti-Ro (SS-A)
* Anti-La (SS-B)
* Anti-ribonucleoprotein
* Anti-Smith
* Anti-topoisomerase (Scl-70)
* Anti-tRNA synthetase
* Anti-PM-Scl
* Anti-MDA-5
C. Morphologic domain
* Suggestive radiology patterns by HRCT :
1. NSIP
2. OP
3. NSIP with OP overlap
4. LIP
* Histopathology patterns or features by surgical lung biopsy:
1. NSIP
2. OP
3. NSIP with OP overlap
4. LIP
5. Interstitial lymphoid aggregates with germinal centres
* Diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltration (with or without lymphoid follicles)
* Multi-compartment involvement (in addition to interstitial pneumonia):
1. Unexplained pleural effusion or thickening, pericardial effusion /thickening, intrinsic airways disease (by PFT, imaging or pathology) or pulmonary vasculopathy.
The conclusion of the research statement from ERS/ATS was that "prospective studies are urgently needed to validate the proposed classification criteria and to determine the natural history and clinical implications of a classification of IPAF", which is the purpose of this study.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that LTx-free survival in IPAF is better than in IPF, and similar to that of ILD secondary to CTD. It is also possible that different phenotypes of IPAF exist, and it may be prognostically relevant to distinguish them at the time of diagnosis.
We also hypothesize that a sizable proportion of IPAF patients may develop clear clinical or serologic features of CTD during the observation period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Not a new diagnosis of IPAF
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western University, Canada
OTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Mura, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lawson Research Institute
Pari Basharat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lawson Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Science Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK, Cadranel J, Corte TJ, du Bois RM, Lee JS, Leslie KO, Lynch DA, Matteson EL, Mosca M, Noth I, Richeldi L, Strek ME, Swigris JJ, Wells AU, West SG, Collard HR, Cottin V; "ERS/ATS Task Force on Undifferentiated Forms of CTD-ILD". An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research statement: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46(4):976-87. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00150-2015. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Oldham JM, Adegunsoye A, Valenzi E, Lee C, Witt L, Chen L, Husain AN, Montner S, Chung JH, Cottin V, Fischer A, Noth I, Vij R, Strek ME. Characterisation of patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Eur Respir J. 2016 Jun;47(6):1767-75. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01565-2015. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Ahmad K, Barba T, Gamondes D, Ginoux M, Khouatra C, Spagnolo P, Strek M, Thivolet-Bejui F, Traclet J, Cottin V. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: Clinical, radiologic, and histological characteristics and outcome in a series of 57 patients. Respir Med. 2017 Feb;123:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Kelly BT, Moua T. Overlap of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features with undifferentiated connective tissue disease and contribution of UIP to mortality. Respirology. 2018 Jun;23(6):600-605. doi: 10.1111/resp.13254. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Collins BF, Spiekerman CF, Shaw MA, Ho LA, Hayes J, Spada CA, Stamato CM, Raghu G. Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Associated With Autoantibodies: A Large Case Series Followed Over 1 Year. Chest. 2017 Jul;152(1):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
Ferri C, Manfredi A, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, Giuggioli D, Vacchi C, Della Casa G, Cerri S, Torricelli P, Luppi F. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and undifferentiated connective tissue disease: Our interdisciplinary rheumatology-pneumology experience, and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. 2016 Jan;15(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6476
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.