Mulligan Concept in the Treatment of Ankle Sprains

NCT ID: NCT03948503

Last Updated: 2022-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of the study is to establish the efficiency of the mulligan concept vs a sham group (who will also serve as control). Patient with an subacute ankle sprains will be assess following the mulligan concept and then randomized in two groups: Mobilization with movement (MWM) group and Sham group. MWM group will receive 3 sets of 10 repetitions of treatment (i.e. passive accessory glide during an active dorsiflexion) while the sham treatment will do 3 sets of 10 active dorsiflexion with the hand of the Physiotherapist only apply on the skin. 3 sessions with 4 days apart will take place. outcomes will be measure before and after every sessions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All included subject will received the Mulligan concept assessment. First investigator will applied non-weight bearing inferior tibiofibular mobilization with movement (MWM), i.e. passive accessory glide in a posterior and superior direction on the inferior tibiofibular joint. If not painful, Weightbearing inferior tibiofibular MWM will be applied 6 times. it consist on applying a passive accessory glide on the subject while he/she is doing an active dorsiflexion of the injured ankle. Dorsiflexion range of motion, pain and function will be reassess. If either one of previously cited outcomes is improve, subject is considered respondents. If he/she feels any pain or no improvements at all, he/she will be considered non-respondents. If non-weight-bearing inferior tibiofibular MWM is painful, talocrural MWM will be apply, first in non-weightbearing and if painfree, in weight bearing position. Talocrural MWM consist on a posterior glide of the talus while the subject realized an active dorsiflexion of the injured ankle. Same outcomes as previsouly cited will be assess and will determine if the patient is respondent or non-respondent. If the subject is non-respondent of the talocrural MWM or if he/she felt any pain during the talocrural MWM, a non weightbearing cubometatarsal MWM, i.e. cranio-caudal glide of the lateral cubometatarsal joint during an active dorsiflexion of the injured ankle, will be applied. If painfree, a tape will be placed as to replicate the cubometatarsal MWM, and the patient will reassess ROM, pain and function with the tape to see whether he/she is a respondent or non respondent subject. If the subject is non-respondent to neither of the three MWM, he/she is considered a drop-out. Respondent patient will then be randomized into two groups: MWM group and Sham group. MWM group will receive 3 sessions with 4 days apart of 3 sets of 10 repetitions of preferential MWM (inferior tibiofibular, talocrural, cubometatarsal) while the sham group will receive 3 sessions with 4 days apart of 3 sets of 10 repetitions with the first investigator doing a light touch during an active dorsiflexion, mimicking the real MWM techniques. Outcomes will be measures at T0 (beginning of the treatment-beginning of the first session), T1 (end of the first session), T2 (beginning of the second session), T3 (end of the second session), T4 (beginning of the third session) and T5 (end of the treatment-end of the third session).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Sprain 1St Degree Ankle Sprain 2Nd Degree

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mobilization with movement (MWM) group

Application of the Mulligan concept

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mulligan concept

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mobilization with movement during an active dorsi-flexion of the ankle

Sham group

Sham treatment

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham mobilization with movement during an active dorsi-flexion of the ankle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mulligan concept

Mobilization with movement during an active dorsi-flexion of the ankle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo

Sham mobilization with movement during an active dorsi-flexion of the ankle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ankle sprain since 2 weeks to 12 weeks
* Grade 1 or 2 ankle sprain
* Asymetrical dorsi-flexion limitation

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute or Grade 3 ankle sprain
* More than 12 weeks ankle sprain
* Any other trauma of the lower limb
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Université Catholique de Louvain

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Mahaudens

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Université Catholique de Louvain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/21NOV/439

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.