Comparison Between Two Mobilization Techniques of Ankle on Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT ID: NCT03079804
Last Updated: 2017-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-30
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Weight Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT): The WBLT consisting of the use of a tape measure has no soil in which the participant will support or be evaluated so that the first finger touches On the tape and its distance to a reference wall for tape measurement. Required that the participant performs ankle dorsiflexion in CCF with the purpose of approaching the knee in the wall avoiding to remove the heel of the ground, that is on a marking.
Y test: To evaluate the dynamic balance and reach of lower limbs will be used The test balance consisting of the evaluation of the participant's performance during the movements of anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral angle with the value measured in centimeters with metric tapes In Direction.
The protocol performed six replicates for adaptation and one final repeat that is considered as a result of the test. For an earlier point, the reference point used is not support for a fixed reference point for the intersection of the conditions and for two other directions used. It is necessary that the participant be the same as the member farthest from the starting point without touching the tape. At the end of the seventh repetition is measured or value and considered the test result.
Intervention: Participants are divided into three groups: Thrust Group in open kinetic chain; MWM group in closed kinetic chain and control group with placebo intervention. Allocation in one of the groups will be randomized by lot.
Taken as applications of the questionnaires and initial evaluations (BBS, WBLT, Y Test), the assays receive a specific technique, are reassessed with the BBS and WBLT.
Talocrural manipulation: The technique of talocrural manipulation consists in the application of traction with a high caudal direction. Follow with the participant in supine position and as two hands to therapist around the talocrural joint, fifth finger in the anterior talar region and the two thumbs in the plantar area do the participant performing a manipulation in the affected limb. It is not considered an audible cavitation presence.
Mobilization with Motion (MWM): The Mulligan® concept-mobilized manual therapy technique follows the following protocol: the athlete is positioned on a stretcher with the limb treated in hip and knee flexion and the contralateral limb in knee flexion And neutral hip. With the use of a belt in the hip region of the physiotherapist and on a distal tibiofibular joint of the participant and bulkhead between the limb and the belt, they are placed as two hands of the physiotherapist superimposed non-talus for stabilization. With the posterior removal of the physiotherapist's hip a distal end of the tibia and fibula will be tractioned and maintained anteriorly, while requested that the participant performed an active knee flexion movement in a closed kinetic chain in order to force the movement of ankle dorsiflexion And thus, once the end point for the purpose, a mobilization will be held for 10 seconds. The patient will return to the starting point resting for 20 seconds for a next mobilization. In all, 4 separate mobilizations.
Placebo intervention: The positioning of the hand in the specific treatment condition (Thrust or MWM) will be accurately reproduced, however, without any movement or force being applied. All interactions, procedures and deadlines are identical.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental MWM
Other names:
4 mobilizations - 10 seconds 20 seconds of rest
Experimental MWM
Mobilization with Movement
Experimental Thrust
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Placebo
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Experimental Thrust
Other names:
1 traction with caudal direction in high speed and low amplitude increasing dorsiflexion.
Experimental MWM
Mobilization with Movement
Experimental Thrust
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Placebo
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Placebo
Other names:
It will accurately reproduce the positioning of the hand in the specific treatment condition (Thrust or MWM), however, without applying any movement or force. All interactions, procedures and deadlines will be identical.
Experimental MWM
Mobilization with Movement
Experimental Thrust
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Placebo
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental MWM
Mobilization with Movement
Experimental Thrust
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Placebo
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Federal do Ceara
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima
Head of Department of Physical Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pedro Lima, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UFC - DEFISIO
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Pedro O Lima, Professor
Role: primary
Laísa B Maia, Student
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
POdePLima
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id