Comparison of a Novel Transperineal Targeted Fusion Biopsy System to Conventional Transrectal Targeted Fusion Biopsy
NCT ID: NCT03936127
Last Updated: 2022-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-11
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The expected sample size at The Ottawa Hospital is 360 men.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
US/MRI Fusion Local Anestesia TransPerineal Prostate Biopsies for Detection of Prostate Cancer
NCT04797078
Micro-Ultrasound/Magnetic Resonance Imaging 001
NCT03938376
Comparing Transperineal to Transrectal MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy
NCT03413137
Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 18F-DCFPyL PET/MR
NCT03149861
Fusion or Cognitive Ultrasound-guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer
NCT06517901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the second visit, which is standard of care, the Urologist (or delegate \[Resident, Fellow\]) will discuss targeted biopsy and will introduce the trial design obtaining informed consent to participate. If consent is obtained, the patient will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard transrectal (TR) ultrasound guided targeted fusion biopsy or the novel transperineal (TP) targeted fusion biopsy system which has also been preliminarily validated as being accurate for detection of significant prostate cancers at targeted biopsy.
Patients will be notified regarding which method of targeted biopsy will be employed at time of scheduling.
Both the TR and TP biopsies will be conducted in existing biopsy rooms in The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) and will employ a brief 30-minute post-procedural observation period at which point the patient is required to urinate prior to discharge. Level of pain will be recorded by the ultrasound technologists during the 30 minutes observation period as well.
This study aims to compare ultrasound guided transrectal and transperineal targeted fusion biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in abnormalities detected on MRI for the purpose of reducing or completely eliminating the risk of serious infection associated with the transrectal approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transperineal (TP) Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Transperineal (TP) ultrasound (US) targeted fusion biopsy (which is performed using a validated Health Canada approved elastic software fusion platform).
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Transrectal (TR) Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsies
Transrectal (TR) ultrasound (US) targeted fusion biopsy (which is performed using a validated Health Canada approved elastic software fusion platform).
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Ultrasound (US) Targeted Fusion Biopsy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient re-evaluated in the TOH Prostate CAC (Cancer Assessment Centre) for planning of targeted biopsy
* Signed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer enrolled in active surveillance
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association
OTHER
Dr. Nicola Schieda
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Nicola Schieda
Director of Abdominal and Pelvic MRI, The Ottawa Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicola Schieda, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Ottawa Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH, Loblaw DA, Trachtenberg J, Stanimirovic A, Simor AE, Seth A, Urbach DR, Narod SA. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S12-7; discussion S17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.015.
Rudzinski JK, Kawakami J. Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: A retrospective population-based analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 May;8(5-6):E301-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1751.
Guo LH, Wu R, Xu HX, Xu JM, Wu J, Wang S, Bo XW, Liu BJ. Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 3;5:16089. doi: 10.1038/srep16089.
Verma S, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Oto A, Tempany CM, Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB. The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):343-356. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161684.
Barrett T, Haider MA. The Emerging Role of MRI in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance and Ongoing Challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):131-139. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16355. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
Kosarek CD, Mahmoud AM, Eyzaguirre EJ, Shan Y, Walser EM, Horn GL, Williams SB. Initial series of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted prostate biopsy using the first transperineal targeted platform available in the USA. BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):909-912. doi: 10.1111/bju.14206. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
Costa DN, Kay FU, Pedrosa I, Kolski L, Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, Hornberger B, Xi Y, Francis F, Rofsky NM. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience. Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e15-149.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
Oderda M, Faletti R, Battisti G, Dalmasso E, Falcone M, Marra G, Palazzetti A, Zitella A, Bergamasco L, Gandini G, Gontero P. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate with Koelis Fusion Biopsies versus Cognitive Biopsies: A Comparative Study. Urol Int. 2016;97(2):230-7. doi: 10.1159/000445524. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
Schmit GD, Schenck LA, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Kurup AN, Weisbrod AJ, Kor DJ, Callstrom MR, Atwell TD, Carter RE. Predicting renal cryoablation complications: new risk score based on tumor size and location and patient history. Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):903-10. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132548. Epub 2014 May 7.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Canadian Cancer Society (2018) Canadian Cancer Statistics
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20190262-01H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.