Ergonomics Training Program to Industrial Workers

NCT ID: NCT03926871

Last Updated: 2019-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

133 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-20

Study Completion Date

2015-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This quasi-experimental study was performed in poultry processing industry. The study aimed to evaluate the benefits of ergonomic training for novice and experienced workers. Sociodemographic and occupational questionnaires were evaluated, musculoskeletal complaints and pain intensity, perceived occupational effort, biomechanical exposure and perception in adopting the training. Complaints in the cervical, wrist and lumbar region were reduced with training, but the intensity of pain was only reduced in the wrist region. There was a reduction in the occupational biomechanical exposure from pre-training, to the post-immediate, and from pre-training to after 2 months for both beginners and experienced. The group of novice workers differed from those with the highest biomechanical exposure reduction in the cutting room tasks. All workers were benefited by ergonomic training in the short and medium term.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The research was submitted to the Local Research Ethics Committee and approved by the number 734.500.

Were included 51 employees from the packing and cutting room sectors. The workers were allocated to Novato and Experienced workers groups. The inclusion criteria for the Novato workers group were to be newly hired (1 to 2 days in the company) and not have previous experience in a poultry processing industry, or butcher's shop. It is to ensure that they did not have prior knowledge of the activity. In the case of the group of experienced workers.

The exclusion criteria were they worked on the task for more than six months and not be absent during the study period (scheduled vacations). Workers who had already received ergonomic training, such as general guidelines and postural adjustments, as well as pregnant women and people with disabilities were excluded.

Outcomes measure

1. Musculoskeletal Complains and Pain Intensity The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was used to investigate the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the last month, using dichotomous responses (yes or no) The visual analogue pain scale evaluated the intensity of symptoms indicating "absence of pain" (0) on one side and the opposite side "unbearable pain" (10 cm) (Carlsson 1982). The QNSO and pain scale were applied in both groups at the baseline, and after 2 months of the ergonomic training program.
2. Biomechanical Exposure Analysis The analysis of occupational biomechanical exposure occurred through a Poultry processing Check list (PPChecklist) created for the study. The PPChecklist evaluation criteria were based on observational methods for biomechanical exposure analysis, such as the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Strain Index and the Checklist for Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment (RARME).

The analyzes of the video tasks of each worker for the application of the PPChecklist was performed by two independent evaluators (MSD and DPV) with experience in Worker's Health and Ergonomics. The results obtained with the analysis of the biomechanical exposure of each segment (cervical, shoulder, forearm, wrist, hand and spine) were added to obtain a general task risk score for each worker with a variation of the score between 0 -19 points. The higher the score, the greater the biomechanical exposure of the workers.
3. Perceived effort and Training Perception The effort perceived by workers in pre-training was evaluated by Borg scale ranges from zero (rest / effortless perceived) to ten (very, very heavy / too much, too much effort).

To evaluate the self-perception of the ease / difficulty of following the training guidelines was created a questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Occupational Exposure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two independents groups (Novice and Experienced). Both groups received ergonomics training in workplace.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The evaluators performed the biomechanical exposure analysis without knowing that the workers were from the novice and experienced group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Novices

They received ergonomic training after 1-2 days of hiring to do the work in the cutting room, and packaging sectors. They did not have experience in the refrigerator or butchers, so they had the minimum of information about tasks and risks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ergonomic Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The ergonomic training consisted of an educational program in Ergonomics with a duration of 60 (sixty) minutes divided into a theoretical exposition and videos of the occupational tasks performed by the workers themselves. Theoretical lecture covered topics such as ergonomics, human anatomy, worker health, prevention measures to minimize the risks of musculoskeletal diseases. A better way of performing the work to protect the musculoskeletal system was demonstrated.

Experienced

They received the same ergonomic training as the newbies, and should have been hired for more than 6 months in the company. In this period they had already acquired patterns of movement and self-protection to accomplish the tasks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ergonomic Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The ergonomic training consisted of an educational program in Ergonomics with a duration of 60 (sixty) minutes divided into a theoretical exposition and videos of the occupational tasks performed by the workers themselves. Theoretical lecture covered topics such as ergonomics, human anatomy, worker health, prevention measures to minimize the risks of musculoskeletal diseases. A better way of performing the work to protect the musculoskeletal system was demonstrated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ergonomic Training

The ergonomic training consisted of an educational program in Ergonomics with a duration of 60 (sixty) minutes divided into a theoretical exposition and videos of the occupational tasks performed by the workers themselves. Theoretical lecture covered topics such as ergonomics, human anatomy, worker health, prevention measures to minimize the risks of musculoskeletal diseases. A better way of performing the work to protect the musculoskeletal system was demonstrated.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Postural and Occupational (tasks) training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To Novato workers

* 1 to 2 days in the company
* Not have previous experience in a frigorifico, or butcher's shop
* Not have prior knowledge of the activity. To experienced workers
* Work on the task for more than six months
* Be present in company during the study period

Exclusion Criteria

For all workers

* Had already received ergonomic training (general guidelines and postural adjustments)
* Pregnant women
* People with disabilities.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rosimeire Simprini Padula

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rosimeire Simprini Padula

Adjunt professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

734.500

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cervical Spine Health of Surgeons
NCT01932307 WITHDRAWN NA