PROSpect: Prone and Oscillation Pediatric Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT03896763

Last Updated: 2026-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a life-threatening and frequent problem experienced by thousands of children each year. Little evidence supports current supportive practices during their critical illness. The overall objective of this study is to identify the best positional and/or ventilation practice that leads to improved patient outcomes in these critically ill children. We hypothesize that children with high moderate-severe PARDS treated with either prone positioning or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) will demonstrate more days off the ventilator when compared to children treated with supine positioning or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PROSpect is a two-by-two factorial, response-adaptive, randomized controlled clinical trial of supine/prone positioning and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV)/high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). About 60 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), two thirds U.S. and one third international, with at least 5 years of experience with prone positioning and HFOV in the care of pediatric patients with severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS), that can provide back-up extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, are participating. Eligible consecutive subjects with high moderate-severe PARDS will be randomized to one of four groups: supine/CMV, prone/CMV, supine/HFOV, prone/HFOV. Subjects who fail their assigned positional and/or ventilation therapy for either persistent hypoxia or hypercapnia may receive the reciprocal therapy while being considered for ECMO cannulation. Our primary outcome is ventilator-free days (VFD) through day 28, where non-survivors receive zero VFD. We hypothesize that children with severe PARDS treated with either prone positioning or HFOV will demonstrate ≥ 2 more VFD. Our secondary outcome is nonpulmonary organ failure-free days. We will also explore the interaction effects of prone positioning with HFOV on VFDs and also investigate the impact of these interventions on 90-day in-hospital mortality and, among survivors, the duration of mechanical ventilation, PICU and hospital length of stay, and the trajectory of post-PICU functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Up to 600 subjects with severe PARDS will be randomized, stratified by age group and direct/indirect lung injury. Adaptive randomization will first occur after 300 patients are randomized and have been followed for 28 days, and every 100 patients thereafter. At these randomization update analyses, new allocation probabilities will be computed based on ongoing intention-to-treat trial results, increasing allocation to well performing arms and decreasing allocation to poorly performing arms. Data will be analyzed per intention-to-treat for the primary analyses and per-protocol received for primary, secondary and exploratory analyses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Two-by-two factorial, response-adaptive, randomized controlled clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supine / CMV

Supine positioning and conventional mechanical ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Either supine or prone positioning and either CMV or HFOV

Intervention Type OTHER

Supine positioning: Subjects randomized to supine positioning will remain supine.

Prone positioning: Subjects randomized to prone positioning will be positioned prone ≥16 hours/day for a maximum of 28 days.

CMV strategy: Low tidal volume to obtain exhaled Vt of 5-7 ml/kg (ideal body weight), PIP goal limited to ≤ 28 cm H2O and lung recruitment maneuver to identify best PEEP then maintained per PEEP-FiO2 grid.

HFOV strategy: Frequency at 8-12 Hz, amplitude (delta-P) 60-90 and mPaw recruitment maneuver.

Prone / CMV

Prone positioning and conventional mechanical ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Either supine or prone positioning and either CMV or HFOV

Intervention Type OTHER

Supine positioning: Subjects randomized to supine positioning will remain supine.

Prone positioning: Subjects randomized to prone positioning will be positioned prone ≥16 hours/day for a maximum of 28 days.

CMV strategy: Low tidal volume to obtain exhaled Vt of 5-7 ml/kg (ideal body weight), PIP goal limited to ≤ 28 cm H2O and lung recruitment maneuver to identify best PEEP then maintained per PEEP-FiO2 grid.

HFOV strategy: Frequency at 8-12 Hz, amplitude (delta-P) 60-90 and mPaw recruitment maneuver.

Supine / HVOF

Supine positioning and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Either supine or prone positioning and either CMV or HFOV

Intervention Type OTHER

Supine positioning: Subjects randomized to supine positioning will remain supine.

Prone positioning: Subjects randomized to prone positioning will be positioned prone ≥16 hours/day for a maximum of 28 days.

CMV strategy: Low tidal volume to obtain exhaled Vt of 5-7 ml/kg (ideal body weight), PIP goal limited to ≤ 28 cm H2O and lung recruitment maneuver to identify best PEEP then maintained per PEEP-FiO2 grid.

HFOV strategy: Frequency at 8-12 Hz, amplitude (delta-P) 60-90 and mPaw recruitment maneuver.

Prone / HFOV

Prone positioning and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Either supine or prone positioning and either CMV or HFOV

Intervention Type OTHER

Supine positioning: Subjects randomized to supine positioning will remain supine.

Prone positioning: Subjects randomized to prone positioning will be positioned prone ≥16 hours/day for a maximum of 28 days.

CMV strategy: Low tidal volume to obtain exhaled Vt of 5-7 ml/kg (ideal body weight), PIP goal limited to ≤ 28 cm H2O and lung recruitment maneuver to identify best PEEP then maintained per PEEP-FiO2 grid.

HFOV strategy: Frequency at 8-12 Hz, amplitude (delta-P) 60-90 and mPaw recruitment maneuver.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Either supine or prone positioning and either CMV or HFOV

Supine positioning: Subjects randomized to supine positioning will remain supine.

Prone positioning: Subjects randomized to prone positioning will be positioned prone ≥16 hours/day for a maximum of 28 days.

CMV strategy: Low tidal volume to obtain exhaled Vt of 5-7 ml/kg (ideal body weight), PIP goal limited to ≤ 28 cm H2O and lung recruitment maneuver to identify best PEEP then maintained per PEEP-FiO2 grid.

HFOV strategy: Frequency at 8-12 Hz, amplitude (delta-P) 60-90 and mPaw recruitment maneuver.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Supine positioning Prone positioing Conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Intubated and mechanically ventilated with high moderate-severe PARDS for \<48 hours per PALICC guidelines (chest imaging consistent with acute pulmonary parenchymal disease and OI ≥12 or OSI ≥10). We require two blood gases meeting moderate-severe PARDS criteria (separated by at least 4 ± 2 hours during which time the clinical team is actively working to recruit lung volume and optimize the patient's hemodynamic status per PALICC guidelines; specifically, incremental and decremental PEEP changes to optimize lung volume). A second blood gas is not required for OI ≥16.

* Post lung transplant
* Home ventilator dependent with baseline Oxygen Saturation Index (OSI) \>6
* Neuromuscular respiratory failure
* Critical airway (e.g., post laryngotracheal surgery or new tracheostomy) or anatomical obstruction of the lower airway (e.g., mediastinal mass)
* Facial surgery or trauma in previous 2 weeks
* Head trauma (managed with hyperventilation)
* Intracranial bleeding
* Unstable spine, femur or pelvic fractures
* Open abdomen
* Currently receiving more than 6 consecutive hours of either prone positioning or HFOV
* Supported on ECMO during the current admission
* Family/medical team not providing full support (patient treatment considered futile)
* Previously enrolled in current study
* Enrolled in any other interventional clinical trial not approved for co-enrollment
* Known pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria

* Perinatal related lung disease
* Unrepaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia or congenital/acquired diaphragm paralysis
* Respiratory failure explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
* Cyanotic heart disease
* Cardiomyopathy
* Unilateral lung disease
* Primary pulmonary hypertension
* Intubated for status asthmaticus
* Obstructive airway disease (e.g., Severe airways disease without parenchymal involvement or disease characterized by hypercapnia with FiO2 \<0.30 and/or evidence of increased resistance visible on the flow - time scalar and/or presence of intrinsic PEEP)
* Active air leak
* Bronchiolitis obliterans
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Martha A.Q. Curley, PhD, RN

Ruth M. Colket Endowed Chair in Pediatric Nursing

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martha AQ Curley, RN, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Ira M. Cheifetz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital

Martin CJ Kneyber, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beatrix Children's Hospital

David Wypij, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Boston Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Banner Health

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arkansas Children's Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Orange County

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Children's Health

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Ann & Robert Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Stead Family Chlldren's Hospital

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Norton Children's Hospital

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Bloomberg Children's Center, Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

CS Mott Children's Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital and Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Cohen Children's Medical Center

Queens, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke Children's Hospital

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

UH Rainbow Babies & Children

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital at Oklahoma University Medical Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Penn State Children's Hospital

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

LeBonheur Children's Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Medical City Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Children's Health Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Inova Fairfax Medical Campus

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

American Family Children's Hospital, University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Hospital de Pediatría J. P. Garrahan. SAMIC

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Perth Children's Hospital

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Children's Hospital at Westmead

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Sabara Hospital Infantil

São Paulo, Brazil, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital SEPACO

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Münster University Hospital

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Rainbow Children's Hospital

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Hadassah Medical Center

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Meyer Children's Hospital

Florence, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital (Area Rossa Unit)

Rome, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Instituto Giannina Gasilini

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

University of Malaysia Medical Center

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Chonnam National University Hospital

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Shaikh Khalifa Medical City

Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status

Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, UK, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Leicester NHS Trust

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Canada Germany India Israel Italy Malaysia Netherlands South Korea Thailand United Arab Emirates United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kneyber MCJ, Cheifetz IM, Asaro LA, Graves TL, Viele K, Natarajan A, Wypij D, Curley MAQ; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network. Protocol for the Prone and Oscillation Pediatric Clinical Trial ( PROSpect ). Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):e385-e396. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003541. Epub 2024 May 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38801306 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5UH3HL141736-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

831295

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Eliminating Monitor Overuse Trial (EMO Trial)
NCT05132322 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA