Single Session Virtual Reality Therapy in Acrophobia - and the Role of Respiration

NCT ID: NCT03893214

Last Updated: 2019-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2020-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In recent years, in the treatment of phobias, exposure therapy in virtual reality is becoming more and more popular as an alternative for in-vivo exposure. Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is comparable to in-vivo exposure therapy, though several characteristics of the VRET have an impact on the outcome of the therapy (e.g., immersion into the virtual environment (VE), familiarity with the VE). Additionally, the use of VRET varies from multiple exposure sessions to single-session VRET. Single-session therapy has an economic advantage and in in-vivo, post therapy outcomes show good results. In virtual reality, the assessment of outcome post therapy and in follow-up of single-session therapies is still needed for an evaluation of this approach. As an outcome measure, behavioral assessments are especially relevant for effectiveness studies as in fear of heights it is closer to the individual's life to know how high they voluntarily go up a building than to have hypothetical self-report questionnaire results.

Much research has been conducted on physiological correlates of the subjective experience of fear in exposure therapy as they are assumed to be a prerequisite for effective exposure treatment. Skin conductance level (SCL) and heart rate can be used for objective manipulation checks of exposure therapy. SCL is found to increase during fearful situations independent of setting while heart rate only increases during in-vivo exposure. Contrary to heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV) is not thoroughly studied in VRET yet. HRV is associated with the adaptability of an organism to new environments and cognitive functioning. High Frequency HRV is found to be reduced in individuals with mental disorders, and positive and negative mood inductions lead to differential HRV responses overall.

Respiration is a well-studied correlate of emotional experience and especially of the experience of fear and anxiety. In a series of experiments, it was found that sighing is tightly associated with relief in or after fearful or stressful situations and might become maladaptive when used disproportionally often. This study shows that respiration parameters have an impact on the handling of fearful situations in a reciprocal way. On the one hand, fear leads to an increased respiration rate and sigh rate while on the other hand, an altered sigh rate or respiration rate might have an impact on the experience of fear and be used as a defensive reaction to a fearful situation. As such, specific respiration patterns might act as emotion-driven behaviors (EDB). EDBs are responses to emotions that result in a short-term reduction of a negative state while in long-term support the maintenance of the phobia.

The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a single-session VRET for acrophobia with a multimethod outcome design. Familiarity of the setting will be high with the use of a well-known tower in this area. Immersion into the VE will be assessed with a presence questionnaire. For a manipulation check, physiological data will be assessed, i.e., SCL, heart rate and HRV. Primary outcome measure will be a behavioral approach test (BAT) as behavioral assessment. Additionally, after four weeks, a follow-up assessment will investigate the stability of the effectiveness of the VRET in comparison to a waitlist control group. A second aim of this study is to investigate the impact of respiration as an EDB on the effectiveness of an exposure therapy. Therefore, the association between respiration and outcome of the VRET will be analyzed.

Hypothesis 1: Participants in the VRET condition show less height avoidance in the BAT after the intervention than participants in the control condition.

Hypothesis 2: Participants in the VRET condition show less height avoidance in the BAT in a four-week follow-up assessment than participants in the control condition.

Hypothesis 3: Participants in the VRET condition score significantly lower on the Acrophobia Questionnaire at follow-up than participants in the control condition.

Hypothesis 4: During the VRET, breath holding is used as EDB. Participants that hold their breath, profit less from the VRET than participants that do not hold their breath.

Hypothesis 5: During the VRET, sighing is used as EDB. Participants that sigh, profit less from the VRET than participants that do not sigh.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acrophobia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Participants are assigned to one of two conditions (virtual reality vs. waitlist control) for the initial phase. In the second phase the waitlist control group receives the virtual reality exposure while the other group does not receive a second intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

All roles are aware of the fact that the virtual reality exposure is the primary intervention. No information is given to the participant about the impact of the "video" in the waitlist control group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intervention group

Virtual reality exposure for acrophobia - this arm receives the virtual reality exposure intervention in the initial phase and has a four-week follow-up assessment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

virtual reality exposure for acrophobia

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The setting of the virtual reality is the "Gasometer Oberhausen", Europe's largest disc-type gas container which is one of the most famous high buildings in the area. After a baseline phase, participants will undergo a gradual exposure. Participants will first look up to the building and then be guided upstairs to have an exposure phase on 11 floors. On the highest floor they will walk around a gallery. In the end, there will be a recovery phase.

waitlist control group

This arm watches a movie in the initial phase in order to control for effects of behavioral approach test that is done before and after the intervention and for time effects. In the second phase after four weeks, this arm receives the virtual reality exposure after collection of outcome measures.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

virtual reality exposure for acrophobia

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The setting of the virtual reality is the "Gasometer Oberhausen", Europe's largest disc-type gas container which is one of the most famous high buildings in the area. After a baseline phase, participants will undergo a gradual exposure. Participants will first look up to the building and then be guided upstairs to have an exposure phase on 11 floors. On the highest floor they will walk around a gallery. In the end, there will be a recovery phase.

movie

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will watch a movie without height content for the same amount of time as the virtual reality exposure will need.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

virtual reality exposure for acrophobia

The setting of the virtual reality is the "Gasometer Oberhausen", Europe's largest disc-type gas container which is one of the most famous high buildings in the area. After a baseline phase, participants will undergo a gradual exposure. Participants will first look up to the building and then be guided upstairs to have an exposure phase on 11 floors. On the highest floor they will walk around a gallery. In the end, there will be a recovery phase.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

movie

Participants will watch a movie without height content for the same amount of time as the virtual reality exposure will need.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosed acrophobia
* read, speak and write in German language

Exclusion Criteria

* current panic disorder
* lifetime psychotic disorder
* current suicidality
* neurological disorder
* current substance use disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruhr University of Bochum

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Witten/Herdecke

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Johannes Michalak

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dirk Adolph, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruhr-University Bochum

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Johannes Michalak, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+49 2302 / 926-787

Naomi Lyons, M.Sc.

Role: CONTACT

+49 2302 / 926-752

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Bullis JR, Gallagher MW, Murray-Latin H, Sauer-Zavala S, Bentley KH, Thompson-Hollands J, Conklin LR, Boswell JF, Ametaj A, Carl JR, Boettcher HT, Cassiello-Robbins C. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders Compared With Diagnosis-Specific Protocols for Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):875-884. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2164.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28768327 (View on PubMed)

Beauchaine TP, Thayer JF. Heart rate variability as a transdiagnostic biomarker of psychopathology. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Nov;98(2 Pt 2):338-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26272488 (View on PubMed)

Benke C, Hamm AO, Pane-Farre CA. When dyspnea gets worse: Suffocation fear and the dynamics of defensive respiratory responses to increasing interoceptive threat. Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1266-1283. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12881. Epub 2017 May 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28466488 (View on PubMed)

Carl E, Stein AT, Levihn-Coon A, Pogue JR, Rothbaum B, Emmelkamp P, Asmundson GJG, Carlbring P, Powers MB. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Jan;61:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30287083 (View on PubMed)

Cohen DC. Comparison of self-report and overt-behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia. Behavior Therapy 8(1): 17-23, 1977.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Courtney R, Greenwood KM. Preliminary investigation of a measure of dysfunctional breathing symptoms: The Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ). International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 12(4): 121-127, 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Diemer J, Muhlberger A, Pauli P, Zwanzger P. Virtual reality exposure in anxiety disorders: impact on psychophysiological reactivity. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;15(6):427-42. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2014.892632. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24666248 (View on PubMed)

Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C. BDI-II - Beck Depressions-Inventar Revision. London: Pearson, 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jerath R, Crawford MW. How Does the Body Affect the Mind? Role of Cardiorespiratory Coherence in the Spectrum of Emotions. Adv Mind Body Med. 2015 Fall;29(4):4-16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26535473 (View on PubMed)

Kemper CJ, Ziegler M, Taylor S. Überprüfung der psychometrischen Qualität der deutschen Version des Angstsensitivitätsindex-3. Diagnostica 55(4): 223-233, 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(3): 203-220, 1993.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kop WJ, Synowski SJ, Newell ME, Schmidt LA, Waldstein SR, Fox NA. Autonomic nervous system reactivity to positive and negative mood induction: the role of acute psychological responses and frontal electrocortical activity. Biol Psychol. 2011 Mar;86(3):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21182891 (View on PubMed)

Margraf J, Cwik JC. Mini-DIPS - Open Access - Diagnostisches Kurzinterview bei psychischen Störungen. 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Morina N, Ijntema H, Meyerbroker K, Emmelkamp PM. Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26355646 (View on PubMed)

Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10(3): 266-281, 2001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Steer RA, Brown GK, Beck AT, Sanderson WC. Mean Beck Depression Inventory-II scores by severity of major depressive episode. Psychol Rep. 2001 Jun;88(3 Pt 2):1075-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1075.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11597055 (View on PubMed)

Vlemincx E, Van Diest I, De Peuter S, Bresseleers J, Bogaerts K, Fannes S, Li W, Van Den Bergh O. Why do you sigh? Sigh rate during induced stress and relief. Psychophysiology. 2009 Sep;46(5):1005-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00842.x. Epub 2009 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19497009 (View on PubMed)

Wilhelm FH, Gevirtz R, Roth WT. Respiratory dysregulation in anxiety, functional cardiac, and pain disorders. Assessment, phenomenology, and treatment. Behav Modif. 2001 Sep;25(4):513-45. doi: 10.1177/0145445501254003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11530714 (View on PubMed)

Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Horowitz JD, Powers MB, Telch MJ. Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;28(6):1021-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18410984 (View on PubMed)

Wolpe J, Lazarus AA. Behavior therapy techniques: A guide to the treatment of neuroses.1966.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VRAcro

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Virtual Reality for Youth Phobias
NCT05839431 COMPLETED NA