MRI Versus Four Dimensional Ultrasound in Detection of CNS Fetal Congenital Anomalies
NCT ID: NCT03888794
Last Updated: 2019-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-20
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
CNS anomalies are usually compatible with life, prolonged hospitalization, higher health care costs, uncertain future life quality and significant burden to families and society.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence of Metabolic Disorders in Neonatal Convulsions
NCT06108778
Transcranial Ultrasound and Transcranial Doppler in Diagnosis and Detection of Outcome in Infants With Neurological Diseases
NCT06352931
Cerebral Function Monitoring in Premature Infants
NCT00873847
MRI-based Biomarkers for Predicting Punctate White Matter Lesions in Neonates
NCT02637817
Perinatal Stroke: Understanding Brain Reorganization
NCT02743728
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prenatal ultrasound has been well established for decades as the primary technique for evaluating the developing fetus in normal as well as in high risk cases. Advantages of US include widespread availability, relatively low cost and quick, lack of harmful effect to fetus or mother and real time imaging.
Although ultrasound can characterize many anomalies accurately, it has many limitations as operator dependent, small field of view, and relatively poor soft-tissue contrast, beam attenuation by maternal adipose tissue and fetal bone, limited visualization of posterior fossa after 33 weeks gestation because of calvarial calcification. Also, ultrasound relies heavily on fetal positioning and presence of sufficient amniotic fluid to provide an adequate acoustic window fetus So, US findings are occasionally incomplete or inconclusive to guide treatment choices.
Fetal brain MRI became embraced as a clinically important imaging technique useful for fetal assessment, which is helpful in formulating prognosis and perinatal management and can detect occult abnormalities in up to 50% of cases for certain indications.
It can overcome many of ultrasound limitations as it is not limited by maternal obesity, fetal position, or oligohydramnios. Additionally, it has better soft tissue contrast resolution, as well as the ability to distinguish individual fetal structures such as brain, lung, liver, kidney, and bowel. In addition, visualization of the brain is not restricted by the ossified skull. Moreover, MRI provides multiplanar imaging as well a larger field of view, facilitating examination of fetuses with large or complex anomalies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging on pregnant women after 18 weeks of pregnancy with US diagnosis of congenital CNS fetal abnormality.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant females with past or family history of congenital fetal abnormality.
Exclusion Criteria
2. pregnancies in first trimester
3. Claustrophobic patients.
4. contraindication to MRI as cochlear implants and pacemakers.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nehal Kamal Mohamed
principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nehal Mohamed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Onkar D, Onkar P, Mitra K. Evaluation of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies by Ultrasound and Its Anatomical Co-relation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jun;8(6):AC05-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8052.4437. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, Vinci V, Saldari M, Catalano C. Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: State-of-the-art. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug;93:273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
Sefidbakht S, Dehghani S, Safari M, Vafaei H, Kasraeian M. Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Experience. Iran J Pediatr. 2016 Jun 6;26(4):e4589. doi: 10.5812/ijp.4589. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MRIUSCNS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.