Estimation of Effective Dose 95 (ED95) of Intrathecal Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP) Based on the Height (cm) of a Patient Undergoing Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy
NCT ID: NCT03882489
Last Updated: 2019-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-04-11
2019-08-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this context, the height of the patient is a criterion involved in the level, the duration of the sensitive motor block and therefore the side effects
The local anesthetic of the amino ester family, isobaric 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP) has been successfully used for spinal anesthesia since several decades. With a short duration of action, it is preferred to other anesthetics for the short-term outpatient surgeries. However, the effective dose 95 (ED95) of intrathecal isobaric 2-CP is currently unknown.
The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the ED95 of the spinal 2-CP using the continuous re-evaluation method (Continual Reassessment Method) (CRM) based on patient's height
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Hyperbaric Prilocaine With Chloroprocaine for Intrathecal Anaesthesia in Day Case Knee Arthroscopy
NCT03038958
Intrathecal Prilocaine and Adductor Canal Block vs Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy
NCT05609565
Spinal Anesthesia With Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine 0.75% for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy
NCT01881087
Comparing Spinal Anesthesia With 1% Chloroprocaine Versus 1% Mepivacaine in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07239999
Using Three Different Doses of Hyperbaric Prilocaine 2% Local Anaesthetic ( 40,50 and 60mg ),Through Spinal Anaesthesia in Knee Arthroscopy Patients to Compare Time to Void
NCT06703580
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1 : Height 150-165 cm
Dose-finding study with 4 subjects per dose and a maximum of 40 patients by cohort. The cohort 1 includes patients whose the height is between 150 and 165 cm. To identify the dose to give for reaching the ED95 (effective dose for 95% subjects), isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated at the dose initial of 40 mg in the cohort 1 for the first 4 subjects. For the next subjects, the doses to administrate will vary 5 mg (0.5 ml) and will be determined by the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) according to the observed responses in the previous subjects. Doses will be staggered from 25 to 50 mg for cohort 1.
Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine
The doses of isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated intrathecally and will be adjusted according to the observed responses in the previous subjects.
Cohort 2 : Height 166-180 cm
Dose-finding study with 4 subjects per dose and a maximum of 40 patients by cohort. The cohort 2 includes patients whose the height is between 166 and 180 cm. To identify the dose to give for reaching the ED95 (effective dose for 95% subjects), isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated at the dose initial of 45 mg in the cohort 2 for the first 4 subjects. For the next subjects, the doses to administrate will vary 5 mg (0.5 ml) and will be determined by the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) according to the observed responses in the previous subjects. Doses will be staggered from 30 to 55 mg for cohort 2.
Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine
The doses of isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated intrathecally and will be adjusted according to the observed responses in the previous subjects.
Cohort 3 : Height 181-195 cm
Dose-finding study with 4 subjects per dose and a maximum of 40 patients by cohort. The cohort 3 includes patients whose the height is between 166 and 180 cm. To identify the dose to give for reaching the ED95 (effective dose for 95% subjects), isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated at the dose initial of 50 mg in the cohort 3 for the first 4 subjects. For the next subjects, the doses to administrate will vary 5 mg (0.5 ml) and will be determined by the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) according to the observed responses in the previous subjects. Doses will be staggered from 35 to 60 mg for cohort 3.
Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine
The doses of isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated intrathecally and will be adjusted according to the observed responses in the previous subjects.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine
The doses of isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administrated intrathecally and will be adjusted according to the observed responses in the previous subjects.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* scheduled outpatient knee arthroscopy
* between 18 and 80 years old
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) \< III
* Height between 150 and 195 cm
Exclusion Criteria
* coagulation disorder (International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.3, platelets\<80.000/mm3)
* known allergy to local anaesthetics
* central and peripheral neuropathies
* patient's refusal
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hôpital de Braine-l'Alleud
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emmanuel Guntz, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Braine-l'Alleud Hospital
Emmanuel Guntz
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Braine-l'Alleud Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Braine-l'Alleud Hospital
Braine-l'Alleud, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yu X, Zhang F. The effect of parturient height on the median effective dose of intrathecally administered ropivacaine. Ann Saudi Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):328-333. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.328.
Forster JG, Rosenberg PH, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Pitkanen MT. Chloroprocaine 40 mg produces shorter spinal block than articaine 40 mg in day-case knee arthroscopy patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):911-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12107. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
FOLDES FF, McNALL PG. 2-Chloroprocaine: a new local anesthetic agent. Anesthesiology. 1952 May;13(3):287-96. doi: 10.1097/00000542-195205000-00009. No abstract available.
Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with small-dose bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):566-572. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143356.17013.A1.
Gonter AF, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with procaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):573-579. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143380.36298.4A.
Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Berti M, Ghisi D, Brivio M, Putzu M, Barbagallo A. Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative-free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison. Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr;104(4):959-64. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8.
Guntz E, Jeanne G, Gouwy J, M'rini M, Saxena S, Fils JF, Kapessidou Y. Influence of height on ED95 of intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for knee arthroscopy: A prospective dose-response clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Jul 1;39(7):602-610. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001692. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B076201836762
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.