Local Infiltration Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT02524652

Last Updated: 2018-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Early rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is of paramount importance and requires optimal pain control based on a multimodal concept, including injection of local anaesthetics. Regarding this latter, different options have emerged recently such as the adductor canal block, performed before the surgery by the anaesthesiologist or the infiltration of the articulation performed by the surgeon at the of the intervention. No trial has compared these two approaches. As practice of medicine should be based on evidence, we decided to undertake this randomised controlled trial where we compared the adductor canal block with the local infiltration analgesia technique in terms of pain and functional outcomes

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under general anaesthesia will be randomly allocated to two groups: local infiltration analgesia or adductor canal block.

The local infiltration analgesia will be performed by the surgeon at the end of surgery with 20 mLs of ropivacaine 0.5%. The adductor canal block will be performed by the anaesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance after the surgery, before awaking the patient, using the same solution (20 mLs ropivacaine 0.5%)

Postoperative analgesia will include intravenous patient-controlled analgesia of morphine (settings 1 mg/ml, 2 ml/10 minutes, 40 mg/4 hours), ibuprofen (3x400 mg) and acetaminophen (4x1000 mg).

A research assistant and a physiotherapist, both blinded to the group allocation, will collect pain and rehabilitation data, respectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Infiltration Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local infiltration analgesia

Infiltration of the knee by the surgeon with local anaesthetics under general anaesthesia.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mLs

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of the local anesthetic at the end of surgery, either in the surgical sites by the surgeon, or in the adductor canal block by the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance.

Adductor canal block

Injection of local anaesthetics under ultrasound guidance in the adductor canal by the anaesthesiologist after the surgery, before awaking the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mLs

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of the local anesthetic at the end of surgery, either in the surgical sites by the surgeon, or in the adductor canal block by the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine 0.5% 20 mLs

Injection of the local anesthetic at the end of surgery, either in the surgical sites by the surgeon, or in the adductor canal block by the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Naropine, Naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients from 18 to 50 years old scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria

* peripheral neuropathy
* pre-existing femoral neuropathy
* diabetes mellitus
* alcoholism
* drug addiction
* cancer with chemotherapy
* chronic pain state
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eric Albrecht

Program Director, Regional Anaesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Albrecht, PD Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHUV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stebler K, Martin R, Kirkham KR, Lambert J, De Sede A, Albrecht E. Adductor canal block versus local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single centre randomised controlled triple-blinded trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e343-e349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.053. Epub 2019 May 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31130273 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CER 193-15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Multimodal Pain Management Following Primary TKA
NCT02369523 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1
Exparel vs Block for ACL Reconstruction
NCT06006624 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4