Continuous Erector Spinea Block Versus Intravenous Analgesia in Coronary Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03866733

Last Updated: 2021-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-18

Study Completion Date

2020-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adequate postoperative pain relief in patients in cardiac surgery is very essential. multimodal techniques for perioperative pain management post cardiac surgery include intravenous patient controlled analgesia, thoracic epidural and paravertebral blockade. Analgesia through thoracic epidural is the gold standard technique for post-sternotomy pain control but it has serious complications. ESP block is an easy technique compared to paravertebral block and less hazardous than thoracic epidural. Hence, this study will compare continuous bilateral erector spinae block guided by ultrasound with intravenous analgesia which is the standard method for pain management in cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Analgesia through thoracic epidural is the gold standard technique for post-sternotomy pain control. in spite of its serious complications such as epidural hematoma with or without paraplegia that enhanced by heparin administered during cardiac bypass surgery..

Paravertebral blockade is comparable to Thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery but it may cause complications such as vascular injuries and pneumothorax.

Erector spinae block is recently implemented technique for treatment and analgesia of thoracic neuropathic pain and post mastectomy syndrome. ESP block is an easy technique compared to paravertebral block and less hazardous than thoracic epidural.

This study will compare continuous bilateral erector spinae block guided by ultrasound versus intravenous analgesia for pain management in cardiac surgery Patients will be enrolled in the study will be divided into two groups In Group A: 20 patients will receive fentanyl after induction and intubation in the dose of ( 3-52mcg/kg ) according to the patients haemodynamic parameters and the decision of the anaesthesia team at skin incision, before starting Cardiopulmonary bypass and again after bypass and before sternal closure. Once the surgical procedure is finished, patients will be transferred to ICU. After ICU transfer acetaminophen 1 gm/6hrs will be given regularly and NSAID if there is no contraindication after extubation. morphine 0.5mg/kg as rescue analgesia will be started upon arrival till extubation.

In Group B: 20 patients will have bilateral ESP block will be done under general anaesthesia bolus dose 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in each of the catheters followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% plain bupivacaine at the rate of 8 ml/h starting in ICU for 48 h after extubation. patients will receive intraoperative boluses of fentanyl according to the patients' haemodynamic and the decision of the anaesthesia team at skin incision, before starting Cardiopulmonary bypass and again after bypass and before sternal closure. Once the surgical procedure is finished, patients will be transferred to ICU morphine 0.5mg/kg as rescue analgesia will be started upon arrival till extubation. Infusion rate will be titrated according to haemodynamics, pain assessment, and complications. After extubation acetaminophen 1gm/6hrs will be given regularly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Erector Spinea Block in Open Heart Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Narcotics group (group N)

intervention: injection of boluses of intra venous Narcotics (fentanyl) in the dose of (3-5 mcg/kg) during the surgery after induction of anesthesia. morphine 0.5mg/kg as rescue analgesia will be started upon arrival till 48 hours after surgery. NSAID every 12 hrs if there is no contraindication and iv acetaminophine igm/6hrs.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intravenous narcotics

Intervention Type DRUG

intervention: injection of boluses of intra venous Narcotic drugs (fentanyl) in the dose of (1-2mcg/kg) during the surgery after induction of anesthesia then fentanyl infusion through the postoperative first 24 hours postoperative till extubation then intravenous pethidine till 48 hours after surgery.

Erector spinea block group (group B)

intervention: after induction our intervention will be the performance of ultrasound guided bilateral continous Erector spinea block with insertion of catheters then 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in each of the catheters followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% plain bupivacaine at the rate of 8 ml/h. morphine 0.5mg/kg as rescue analgesia will be started upon arrival till extubation and iv acetaminophine igm/6hrs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

continous erector spinea block

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound guided erector spinea block will be performed while the patient is in left lateral position ) the US probe will be placed in longitudinal parasagittal plane lateral to the T5 spinous process. An 18-gauge epidural needle will be inserted in-plane in a cranial-to-caudal direction until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle. A 5 cm of epidural catheter will be threaded in cephalad direction. The same steps will be performed on the other side, after the negative aspiration for blood, bolus dose 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in each of the catheters followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% plain bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

continous erector spinea block

Ultrasound guided erector spinea block will be performed while the patient is in left lateral position ) the US probe will be placed in longitudinal parasagittal plane lateral to the T5 spinous process. An 18-gauge epidural needle will be inserted in-plane in a cranial-to-caudal direction until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle. A 5 cm of epidural catheter will be threaded in cephalad direction. The same steps will be performed on the other side, after the negative aspiration for blood, bolus dose 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in each of the catheters followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% plain bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h.

Intervention Type OTHER

intravenous narcotics

intervention: injection of boluses of intra venous Narcotic drugs (fentanyl) in the dose of (1-2mcg/kg) during the surgery after induction of anesthesia then fentanyl infusion through the postoperative first 24 hours postoperative till extubation then intravenous pethidine till 48 hours after surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

iv narcotics and NSAID

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* elective cardiac surgery.
* age 18-65 years.
* patients with median sternotomy.
* body mass index \<30kg.m2.
* left ventricular ejection fraction \>50%.

Exclusion Criteria

* significant aortic stenosis.
* left main coronary artery disease.
* patient on anti-coagulants0
* pre-existing respiratory, neurological, or renal disease.
* CSF or blood tap during the procedure.
* failure to thread the catheter.
* anomalies of vertebral column.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sanaa Farag Mahmoud Wasfy

lecturer of aneathesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanaa Farag Mahmoud

Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt

Site Status

Ainshams hospitals

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fibla JJ, Molins L, Mier JM, Sierra A, Vidal G. Comparative analysis of analgesic quality in the postoperative of thoracotomy: paravertebral block with bupivacaine 0.5% vs ropivacaine 0.2%. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Mar;33(3):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18201893 (View on PubMed)

Raksamani K, Wongkornrat W, Siriboon P, Pantisawat N. Pain management after cardiac surgery: are we underestimating post sternotomy pain? J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Jul;96(7):824-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24319854 (View on PubMed)

Hansdottir V, Philip J, Olsen MF, Eduard C, Houltz E, Ricksten SE. Thoracic epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial on length of hospital stay and patient-perceived quality of recovery. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):142-51. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16394700 (View on PubMed)

Dhole S, Mehta Y, Saxena H, Juneja R, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001 Jun;15(3):288-92. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2001.23271.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11426357 (View on PubMed)

Canto M, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Bataller ML. Bilateral paravertebral blockade for conventional cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2003 Apr;58(4):365-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03082_2.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12688271 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R07l2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.