Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs

NCT ID: NCT03853330

Last Updated: 2022-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the analgesic and respiratory effect of continuous Erector Spinae Plane block versus Thoracic Epidural in patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique which may be an alternative to Paravertebral block (PVB) for providing thoracic analgesia. It involves injection of local anesthetic into the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle. ESP is a more superficial block with a better defined end-point injection between the bony transverse process and erector spinae muscle. A more superficial ultrasound-guided block will be faster to perform and less painful for the patient. ESP does not have the same risk of pneumothorax as PVB.

Epidural analgesia has become the standard of care. Although thoracic epidurals provide excellent analgesia for the management of rib fractures, they are limited to a certain population due to patient factors and side-effects. Many trauma patients have other injuries which contraindicate the use of epidurals, or which prevent positioning for insertion. There are disadvantages to thoracic epidural analgesia. They are technically challenging to insert, with a risk of dural puncture or spinal cord injury. Adverse effects include hypotension, and if opioids used, urinary retention and pruritus. Patients can develop a motor block and are unable to mobilize with an epidural in situ.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture; Rib, Multiple

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
prospective, double-blinded controlled trial; both the patient and data collector is unaware of the study nature

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.

Erector spinae plane block group

25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%

Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution

infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Patients with pre-existing infection at the block site.
* Coagulopathy.
* Allergy to local anesthetics.
* Pre-existing neurological deficits.
* Psychiatric illness.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rasha Hamed

Ass. Prof. in Anesthesia and ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Analgesia for Fracture Ribs

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.