Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs
NCT ID: NCT03853330
Last Updated: 2022-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-01
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block.
NCT04554186
Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Retro Laminar Block Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block in Multiple Rib Fractures
NCT06088836
Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Paravertebral Block for Pain Management in Fractured Ribs
NCT03883958
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Block for Chest Trauma
NCT03797079
Ultrasound-guided Deep Versus Superficial Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures
NCT04575272
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Epidural analgesia has become the standard of care. Although thoracic epidurals provide excellent analgesia for the management of rib fractures, they are limited to a certain population due to patient factors and side-effects. Many trauma patients have other injuries which contraindicate the use of epidurals, or which prevent positioning for insertion. There are disadvantages to thoracic epidural analgesia. They are technically challenging to insert, with a risk of dural puncture or spinal cord injury. Adverse effects include hypotension, and if opioids used, urinary retention and pruritus. Patients can develop a motor block and are unable to mobilize with an epidural in situ.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group
25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution
infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.
Erector spinae plane block group
25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution
infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%
Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution
infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with pre-existing infection at the block site.
* Coagulopathy.
* Allergy to local anesthetics.
* Pre-existing neurological deficits.
* Psychiatric illness.
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rasha Hamed
Ass. Prof. in Anesthesia and ICU
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Analgesia for Fracture Ribs
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.