Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block.

NCT ID: NCT04554186

Last Updated: 2020-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-22

Study Completion Date

2021-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare between serratus anterior plane block and thoracic Paravertebral block in analgesia for patients with multiple rib fractures

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be conducted in a prospective randomised controlled. Patients will be allocated into three groups

Control group:

The patient will receive fentanyl patch 50 microgram

TPVB group:

The patient will receive thoracic vertebral plane lock 0.4ml/kg bupivacaine 0.1 25% will be administered. For continuous infusion catheter will be inserted . Then a rate of 7ml / hour to max 10 ml / hour of bupivacaine 0.0625%

SAPB group,:

Patient will receive serratus anterior plane block 0.4ml / kg bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected to open the space then a catheter will be advanced For continuous infusion of 0.0625 % bupivacaine at 7 ml / hour

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rib Fractures Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Serratus anterior plane block

20 patients will receive SAP block with 0.4 ml / kg bupivacaine 0.125% then continuous infusion through a catheter at rate of 7 ml / hour to max 10 ml / hour of bupivacaine 0.0625%

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Serratus anterior plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of bupivacaine between serratus anterior plane and latissimus dorsi muscle using ultrasound

Thoracic Paravertebral block

20 patients will receive TPVB 0.4ml / kg bupivacaine 0.125% then continuous infusion through a catheter at rate of 7 ml / hour to max 10 ml / hour of bupivacaine 0.0625%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Thoracic Paravertebral block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of bupivacaine in the thoracic Paravertebral space using ultrasound

Control group

20 patients will receive Fentanyl patch 50 microgram

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Place a fentanyl patch 50 microgram

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Serratus anterior plane block

Injection of bupivacaine between serratus anterior plane and latissimus dorsi muscle using ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracic Paravertebral block

Injection of bupivacaine in the thoracic Paravertebral space using ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Control

Place a fentanyl patch 50 microgram

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1\_3 Age 18\_60 Unilateral fracture ribs

Exclusion Criteria

* Drug allergy Morbid obese Opioid dependence Patients refuse
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Gamal Shehata

Assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amany K Aboelhassan

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Minia University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minia university hospital

Minya, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed G Shehata, Master

Role: CONTACT

1067622270 ext. 0020

Omyma M Shehata, MD

Role: CONTACT

1061762894 ext. 0020

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmed G Shehata, Master

Role: primary

1067622270 ext. 0020

Omyma M Shehata, MD

Role: backup

1061762894 ext. 0020

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

112-11/2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.