High Versus Low Bicarbonate Bath in Critically-ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

NCT ID: NCT03846258

Last Updated: 2021-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Researchers are trying to determine which dialysis solution, low bicarbonate fluid (22 mmol/L) or high bicarbonate fluid (32 mmol/L), is better in subjects with acute kidney injury (acute kidney failure) and metabolic acidosis that are admitted to the intensive care unit and require continuous renal replacement therapy (also known as continuous dialysis).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective randomized trial that will be conducted at Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota. It will be based on Good Clinical Practice Standards and performed under IRB supervision. This will be a pragmatic clinical trial due to the nature of the intervention and short interval for making a clinical decision. While dialysis in general is valid in cases of severe AKI and metabolic acidosis, there remains uncertainty as to which replacement fluid to use. In one retrospective study, using high bicarbonate replacement fluid was associated with worse outcomes, even after accounting for several important confounders. While this intervention is valid in cases of severe metabolic acidosis (pH\<7), there has not been much data to support the use of either intervention in cases of any metabolic acidosis in general.

While both interventions are equally valid, to our knowledge, there is no randomized clinical trial evaluating the difference of either intervention on outcomes. There is limited evidence in the literature on benefit or harm associated with either of the interventions on the outcomes thus generating a clinical equipoise. This pivotal study should help guide nephrologists and intensivists on the appropriate prescription of CRRT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metabolic Acidosis Acute Kidney Injury Acute Kidney Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low bicarbonate arm (22 mmol/L)

PHOXILLUM solutions are used as a replacement solution in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. The one to be used in this study has bicarbonate concentration of 22 mmol/L.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low bicarbonate solution (22 mmol/L)

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants randomized to this arm will be started on CRRT using Phoxillum as the replacement fluid.

High Bicarbonate (32 mmol/L)

PrismaSATE is another replacement solution used in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. The one to be used in this study has bicarbonate concentration of 32 mmol/L.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

High Bicarbonate solution (32 mmol/L)

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants randomized to this arm will be started on CRRT using Prismasate as the replacement fluid.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low bicarbonate solution (22 mmol/L)

Participants randomized to this arm will be started on CRRT using Phoxillum as the replacement fluid.

Intervention Type DRUG

High Bicarbonate solution (32 mmol/L)

Participants randomized to this arm will be started on CRRT using Prismasate as the replacement fluid.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Phoxillum Prismasate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age)
* Ability to obtain informed consent, either from patient or legally authorized representative (LAR)
* Diagnosis of AKI according to KDIGO definition \[an increase in serum creatinine concentration of greater than or equal to 0.3 mg/dL within the first 48 hours of injury, a relative increase in serum creatinine of greater than or equal to 50% (1.5-fold from baseline) within the first 7 days of injury, or a reduction in urine output (\<0.5 mL/kg/h for more than 6 hours)\]
* CRRT initiated for the first time during current ICU admission.
* Bicarbonate ≤ 22 mEq/L
* Arterial pH between 7.05 and 7.25(if an ABG is not available, venous pH must be between 7.00 and 7.20)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy (women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test)
* Diagnosis of End-Stage renal disease and receiving Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis prior to ICU admission (this information will be easily obtained by the nephrology team)
* Arterial pH \<7.05 or \>7.25 (if an ABG is not available, Venous pH \<7.00 or \>7.20)
* Potassium level \>6.0 mmol/L
* Severe acute liver failure meeting all the following criteria):

* INR \>2
* AST/ALT more than 500 U/L and
* Bilirubin more than 12 mg/dL)
* Previous enrollment in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kianoush B. Kashani

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kianoush B Kashani

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-010147

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SODium BICarbonate for Metabolic Acidosis in the ICU
NCT05697770 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3
Exploring Water-free Sodium Storage
NCT06872645 RECRUITING NA