Peak Plasma Levels of Bupivacaine After an Erector Spinae Block (ESP)

NCT ID: NCT03841409

Last Updated: 2022-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-14

Study Completion Date

2019-10-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of the study is to measure plasma levels of bupivacaine following erector spinae (ESP) regional block in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent types of cancer in women. Mastectomy is important in treating these cases; however, sometimes it is associated with acute and chronic pain. Multimodal analgesia, combining drug therapy and regional anesthesia, can help in preventing acute and perhaps chronic pain in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

Erector spinae block is a new regional anesthesia technique that has emerged to treat thoracic pain following thoracic and breast surgery. It consists of injecting local anesthetics in the space located between the erector and paravertebral muscles using ultrasound guidance. The injection can be done at the level of T5 allowing distribution of the drug to upper and lower dermatomes.

The dose of local anesthetic injected after erector spinae block should aim to maximize analgesia while minimizing the chance of toxic systemic concentrations. Defining the rate of absorption of local anesthetics into the blood after an erector spinae block will therefore help anesthesiologists determinate optimal analgesic doses, in terms of both safety and effectiveness.

This observational study will determine bupivacaine pharmacokinetics after single shot erector spinae block with bupivacaine, to further define the right dose and duration of surveillance in post-anesthesia care.

Methods:

For the erector spinae block, the patient will be placed in the sitting position. Using an ultrasound machine with a high frequency linear probe (Sonosite, HFL50 15-6MHz) placed in the parasagittal plane, 3cm away from the midline, the anesthesiologist will position an insulated hyperechoic needle (50-80 mm, 22 gauge, SonoPlex STIM, Nanoline, Pajun, Germany) at the level of the 5th thoracic vertebrae, between the erector spinae and the paravertebral muscles. The anesthesiologist will confirm the correct position of the needle with the injection of 1 mL of 5% dextrose. Then, after negative aspiration, he will inject bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 5 mcg/mL in 5 ml aliquots for a total dose of 2mg/kg of ideal body weight (maximum of 150mg).

The end of injection will be considered as T0. Collection of 4.5mL of blood will be performed at T10min, T20min, T30min, T45min, T60min, T90min, T120min, T180min, and T240min.

Blood tubes will be immediately placed on ice to be ultimately sent to the laboratory for centrifugation and measurement of bupivacaine level using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for each of the samples.

General anesthesia will then be induced in the operating room with no additional bupivacaine allowed by the anesthesiologist or the surgeon. After surgery, in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, the level of the sensory block will be identified by pinprick and the quality of analgesia will be evaluated using a verbal numerical rating scale, and opioid consumption will be noted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine dosage in ESP block

The pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 5 mcg/mL for a total dose of 2mg/kg of ideal body weight following an ESP block will be determined by the collection of blood samples at predetermined time points.

Collection of blood samples

Intervention Type OTHER

Nine blood samples will be collected to determine bupivacaine pharmacokinetics at T10min, T20min, T30min, T45min, T60min, T90min, T120min, T180min, and T240min. T0 will be defined as the end of bupivacaine injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collection of blood samples

Nine blood samples will be collected to determine bupivacaine pharmacokinetics at T10min, T20min, T30min, T45min, T60min, T90min, T120min, T180min, and T240min. T0 will be defined as the end of bupivacaine injection.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I-III
* Undergoing unilateral mastectomy under erector spinae block and general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient's refusal or inability to consent
* Allergy, hypersensibility or resistance to local anesthetic
* Contra-indication to regional anesthesia: infection in the designated area, acquired or congenital coagulopathy
* Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (GFR\<30 mL/min)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan Williams, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18.308

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.