Contact: Developing New Clinical Management Strategies

NCT ID: NCT03812588

Last Updated: 2022-04-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-30

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study utilizes a 2 x 2, double-blind, acute, prospective design randomizing adult

outpatients with MDD to "Research Frequency Management" (RFM, weekly study visits) vs. "Community Frequency Management" (CFM, every 4 weeks study visits) and antidepressant medication vs. placebo. Specifying visit frequency as the independent variable in this study has the distinct advantages of being easily operationalized for research purposes avoiding a priori assumptions about which components of study visits influence antidepressant and placebo response (i.e., behavioral activation vs. doctor-patient relationship vs. medical procedures). Close monitoring of all subjects will be assured by telephone evaluations of individuals randomized to CFM at intervals between monthly visits, and additional study contacts will be scheduled as necessary to maintain patient safety (all extra-protocol contacts will be recorded and included as a variable in outcome analyses). Additionally, subjects will be characterized extensively on clinical, demographic, and psychological measures to pilot the study assessment battery and search for predictor variables influencing the effects of contact frequency on medication and placebo response.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.

Research Frequency Management: Placebo

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.

Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.

Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escitalopram

Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lexapro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview
2. Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
3. 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score \< 25 3. HRSD by trained rater
4. Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures 4. Clinical interview
5. Using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age and not currently pregnant 5. Clinical interview

Exclusion Criteria

1. Current comorbid Axis I DSM V disorder other than Mild Substance Use Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder or Personality Disorder 1. Clinical interview, SCID
2. Diagnosis of Moderate to Severe Substance Use Disorder within the past 12 months 2. Clinical interview, SCID, Urine tox
3. present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder 3. Clinical interview, SCID
4. baseline HRSD 24-item score \> 28 or HRSD suicide item \> 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater
5. History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview
6. Current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers 6. Clinical interview
7. CGI-Severity score of 6 or greater at baseline 7. CGI based on Clinical interview
8. Acute, severe, or unstable medical illness 8. Clinical interview, Physical Exam, Screening Labs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Haifa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York State Psychiatric Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bret Rutherford

Associate Professor in Clinical Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bret Rutherford, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New York State Psychiatric Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7738

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.